pith. sign in

arxiv: 1504.00151 · v1 · pith:LAJDJNJRnew · submitted 2015-04-01 · 💻 cs.CC

Bi-polynomial rank and determinantal complexity

classification 💻 cs.CC
keywords rankbi-polynomialcomplexityproblembounddeterminantalminimizationpermanent
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:LAJDJNJR Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{LAJDJNJR}

Prints a linked pith:LAJDJNJR badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

The permanent vs. determinant problem is one of the most important problems in theoretical computer science, and is the main target of geometric complexity theory proposed by Mulmuley and Sohoni. The current best lower bound for the determinantal complexity of the d by d permanent polynomial is d^2/2, due to Mignon and Ressayre in 2004. Inspired by their proof method, we introduce a natural rank concept of polynomials, called the bi-polynomial rank. The bi-polynomial rank is related to width of an arithmetic branching program. The bi-polynomial rank of a homogeneous polynomial p of even degree 2k is defined as the minimum n such that p can be written as a summation of n products of polynomials of degree k. We prove that the bi-polynomial rank gives a lower bound of the determinantal complexity. As a consequence, the above Mignon and Ressayre bound is improved to (d-1)^2 + 1 over the field of reals. We show that the computation of the bi-polynomial rank is formulated as a rank minimization problem. Applying the concave minimization technique, we reduce the problem of lower-bounding determinantal complexity to that of proving the positive semidefiniteness of matrices, and this is a new approach for the permanent vs. determinant problem. We propose a computational approach for giving a lower bound of this rank minimization, via techniques of the concave minimization. This also yields a new strategy to attack the permanent vs. determinant problem.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.