pith. sign in

arxiv: 1507.00868 · v1 · pith:AZQC4HSHnew · submitted 2015-07-03 · 🧮 math.CO · cs.DM

Blocking unions of arborescences

classification 🧮 math.CO cs.DM
keywords problemminimumalgorithmarborescencesunion-arborescencearcscostevery
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Given a digraph $D=(V,A)$ and a positive integer $k$, a subset $B\subseteq A$ is called a \textbf{$k$-union-arborescence}, if it is the disjoint union of $k$ spanning arborescences. When also arc-costs $c:A\to \mathbb{R}$ are given, minimizing the cost of a $k$-union-arborescence is well-known to be tractable. In this paper we take on the following problem: what is the minimum cardinality of a set of arcs the removal of which destroys every minimum $c$-cost $k$-union-arborescence. Actually, the more general weighted problem is also considered, that is, arc weights $w:A\to \mathbb{R}_+$ (unrelated to $c$) are also given, and the goal is to find a minimum weight set of arcs the removal of which destroys every minimum $c$-cost $k$-union-arborescence. An equivalent version of this problem is where the roots of the arborescences are fixed in advance. In an earlier paper [A. Bern\'ath and Gy. Pap, \emph{Blocking optimal arborescences}, Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, 2013] we solved this problem for $k=1$. This work reports on other partial results on the problem. We solve the case when both $c$ and $w$ are uniform -- that is, find a minimum size set of arcs that covers all $k$-union-arbosercences. Our algorithm runs in polynomial time for this problem. The solution uses a result of [M. B\'ar\'asz, J. Becker, and A. Frank, \emph{An algorithm for source location in directed graphs}, Oper. Res. Lett. \textbf{33} (2005)] saying that the family of so-called insolid sets (sets with the property that every proper subset has a larger in-degree) satisfies the Helly-property, and thus can be (efficiently) represented as a subtree hypergraph. We also give an algorithm for the case when only $c$ is uniform but $w$ is not. This algorithm is only polynomial if $k$ is not part of the input.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.