pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 1511.05053 · v1 · pith:5WOPO2VLnew · submitted 2015-11-16 · 💻 cs.CC · cs.DM· cs.DS

A Polynomial Lower Bound for Testing Monotonicity

classification 💻 cs.CC cs.DMcs.DS
keywords monotonicitycomplexityquerytestinglowernon-adaptiveadaptivealgorithms
0
0 comments X p. Extension
Add this Pith Number to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{5WOPO2VL}

Prints a linked pith:5WOPO2VL badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

We show that every algorithm for testing $n$-variate Boolean functions for monotonicity must have query complexity $\tilde{\Omega}(n^{1/4})$. All previous lower bounds for this problem were designed for non-adaptive algorithms and, as a result, the best previous lower bound for general (possibly adaptive) monotonicity testers was only $\Omega(\log n)$. Combined with the query complexity of the non-adaptive monotonicity tester of Khot, Minzer, and Safra (FOCS 2015), our lower bound shows that adaptivity can result in at most a quadratic reduction in the query complexity for testing monotonicity. By contrast, we show that there is an exponential gap between the query complexity of adaptive and non-adaptive algorithms for testing regular linear threshold functions (LTFs) for monotonicity. Chen, De, Servedio, and Tan (STOC 2015) recently showed that non-adaptive algorithms require almost $\Omega(n^{1/2})$ queries for this task. We introduce a new adaptive monotonicity testing algorithm which has query complexity $O(\log n)$ when the input is a regular LTF.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.