pith. sign in

arxiv: 1512.05976 · v1 · pith:ELZ3Y43Hnew · submitted 2015-12-18 · 🧮 math.CO

The uniqueness of a distance-regular graph with intersection array {32,27,8,1;1,4,27,32} and related results

classification 🧮 math.CO
keywords distance-regulardeltagraphthereantipodalarraycoverintersection
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

It is known that, up to isomorphism, there is a unique distance-regular graph $\Delta$ with intersection array {32,27;1,12} (equivalently, $\Delta$ is the unique strongly regular graph with parameters (105,32,4,12)). Here we investigate the distance-regular antipodal covers of $\Delta$. We show that, up to isomorphism, there is just one distance-regular antipodal triple cover of $\Delta$ (a graph $\hat\Delta$ discovered by the author over twenty years ago), proving that there is a unique distance-regular graph with intersection array {32,27,8,1;1,4,27,32}. In the process, we confirm an unpublished result of Steve Linton that there is no distance-regular antipodal double cover of $\Delta$, and so no distance-regular graph with intersection array {32,27,6,1;1,6,27,32}. We also show there is no distance-regular antipodal 4-cover of $\Delta$, and so no distance-regular graph with intersection array {32,27,9,1;1,3,27,32}, and that there is no distance-regular antipodal 6-cover of $\Delta$ that is a double cover of $\hat\Delta$.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.