pith. sign in

arxiv: 1601.01048 · v1 · pith:TS5HAQVOnew · submitted 2016-01-06 · 🧬 q-bio.QM

Community-Wide Evaluation of Computational Function Prediction

classification 🧬 q-bio.QM
keywords computationalfunctionchallengecommunity-wideexperimentsgenemethodsprotein
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:TS5HAQVO Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{TS5HAQVO}

Prints a linked pith:TS5HAQVO badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

A biological experiment is the most reliable way of assigning function to a protein. However, in the era of high-throughput sequencing, scientists are unable to carry out experiments to determine the function of every single gene product. Therefore, to gain insights into the activity of these molecules and guide experiments, we must rely on computational means to functionally annotate the majority of sequence data. To understand how well these algorithms perform, we have established a challenge involving a broad scientific community in which we evaluate different annotation methods according to their ability to predict the associations between previously unannotated protein sequences and Gene Ontology terms. Here we discuss the rationale, benefits and issues associated with evaluating computational methods in an ongoing community-wide challenge.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.