pith. sign in

arxiv: 1601.04429 · v1 · pith:OSWJ4M6Anew · submitted 2016-01-18 · 🧮 math.NA

Flexible sparse regularization

classification 🧮 math.NA
keywords correspondingregularizationspacessparseconvexf-normsflexibleintroduce
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:OSWJ4M6A Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{OSWJ4M6A}

Prints a linked pith:OSWJ4M6A badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

The seminal paper of Daubechies, Defrise, DeMol made clear that $\ell^p$ spaces with $p\in [1,2)$ and $p$-powers of the corresponding norms are appropriate settings for dealing with reconstruction of sparse solutions of ill-posed problems by regularization. It seems that the case $p=1$ provides the best results in most of the situations compared to the cases $p\in (1,2)$. An extensive literature gives great credit also to using $\ell^p$ spaces with $p\in (0,1)$ together with the corresponding quasinorms, although one has to tackle challenging numerical problems raised by the non-convexity of the quasi-norms. In any of these settings, either super, linear or sublinear, the question of how to choose the exponent $p$ has been not only a numerical issue, but also a philosophical one. In this work we introduce a more flexible way of sparse regularization by varying exponents. We introduce the corresponding functional analytic framework, that leaves the setting of normed spaces but works with so-called F-norms. One curious result is that there are F-norms which generate the $\ell^1$ space, but they are strictly convex, while the $\ell^1$-norm is just convex.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.