pith. sign in

arxiv: 1605.03512 · v2 · pith:DEO3IIXOnew · submitted 2016-05-11 · 🧮 math.PR · math.CO

Doob-Martin compactification of a Markov chain for growing random words sequentially

classification 🧮 math.PR math.CO
keywords randomldotslettersfiniteorderresptotalword
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We consider a Markov chain that iteratively generates a sequence of random finite words in such a way that the $n^{\mathrm{th}}$ word is uniformly distributed over the set of words of length $2n$ in which $n$ letters are $a$ and $n$ letters are $b$: at each step an $a$ and a $b$ are shuffled in uniformly at random among the letters of the current word. We obtain a concrete characterization of the Doob-Martin boundary of this Markov chain. Writing $N(u)$ for the number of letters $a$ (equivalently, $b$) in the finite word $u$, we show that a sequence $(u_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$ of finite words converges to a point in the boundary if, for an arbitrary word $v$, there is convergence as $n$ tends to infinity of the probability that the selection of $N(v)$ letters $a$ and $N(v)$ letters $b$ uniformly at random from $u_n$ and maintaining their relative order results in $v$. We exhibit a bijective correspondence between the points in the boundary and ergodic random total orders on the set $\{a_1, b_1, a_2, b_2, \ldots \}$ that have distributions which are separately invariant under finite permutations of the indices of the $a'$s and those of the $b'$s. We establish a further bijective correspondence between the set of such random total orders and the set of pairs $(\mu,\nu)$ of diffuse probability measures on $[0,1]$ such that $\frac{1}{2}(\mu+\nu)$ is Lebesgue measure: the restriction of the random total order to $\{a_1, b_1, \ldots, a_n, b_n\}$ is obtained by taking $X_1, \ldots, X_n$ (resp. $Y_1, \ldots, Y_n$) i.i.d. with common distribution $\mu$ (resp. $\nu$), letting $(Z_1, \ldots, Z_{2n})$ be $\{X_1, Y_1, \ldots, X_n, Y_n\}$ in increasing order, and declaring that the $k^{\mathrm{th}}$ smallest element in the restricted total order is $a_i$ (resp. $b_j$) if $Z_k = X_i$ (resp. $Z_k = Y_j$).

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.