pith. sign in

arxiv: 1608.02007 · v2 · pith:M3TM7XCInew · submitted 2016-08-05 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

LBVs and Statistical Inference

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords statisticallbvssmithsomestandardtomblesonviewaltered
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:M3TM7XCI Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{M3TM7XCI}

Prints a linked pith:M3TM7XCI badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

Smith and Tombleson (2015) asserted that statistical tests disprove the standard view of LBVs, and proposed a far more complex scenario to replace it. But Humphreys et al. (2016) showed that Smith and Tombleson's Magellanic "LBV" sample was a mixture of physically different classes of stars, and genuine LBVs are in fact statistically consistent with the standard view. Smith (2016) recently objected at great length to this result. Here we note that he misrepresented some of the arguments, altered the test criteria, ignored some long-recognized observational facts, and employed inadequate statistical procedures. This case illustrates the dangers of uncareful statistical sampling, as well as the need to be wary of unstated assumptions.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.