Recognition: unknown
Cluster and field elliptical galaxies at z~1.3. The marginal role of the environment and the relevance of the galaxy central regions
read the original abstract
We compared the properties of 56 elliptical galaxies selected from three clusters at $1.2<z<1.4$ with those of field galaxies in the GOODS-S (~30), COSMOS (~180) and CANDELS (~220) fields. We studied the relationships among effective radius, surface brightness, stellar mass, stellar mass density $\Sigma_{Re}$ and central mass density $\Sigma_{1kpc}$ within 1 kpc radius. We find that cluster ellipticals do not differ from field ellipticals: they share the same structural parameters at fixed mass and the same scaling relations. On the other hand, the population of field ellipticals at $z\sim1.3$ shows a significant lack of massive ($M_*> 2\times 10^{11}$ M$_\odot$) and large (R$_e > 4-5$ kpc) ellipticals with respect to the cluster. Nonetheless, at $M*<2\times 10^{11}$ M$_\odot$, the two populations are similar. The size-mass relation of ellipticals at z~1.3 defines two different regimes, above and below a transition mass $m_t\sim 2-3\times10^{10}$ M$_\odot$: at lower masses the relation is nearly flat (R$_e\propto M_*^{-0.1\pm 0.2}$), the mean radius is constant at ~1 kpc and $\Sigma_{Re}\sim \Sigma_{1kpc}$ while, at larger masses, the relation is R$_e\propto M*^{0.64\pm0.09}$. The transition mass marks the mass at which galaxies reach the maximum $\Sigma_{Re}$. Also the $\Sigma_{1kpc}$-mass relation follows two different regimes, $\Sigma_{1kpc}\propto M*^{0.64\ >m_t}_{1.07\ <m_t}$, defining a transition mass density $\Sigma_{1kpc}\sim 2-3\times10^3$ M$_\odot$ pc$^{-2}$. The mass density $\Sigma_{Re}$ does not correlate with mass, dense/compact galaxies can be assembled over a wide mass regime, independently of the environment. The central mass density, $\Sigma_{1kpc}$, besides to be correlated with the mass, is correlated to the age of the stellar population: the higher the central stellar mass density, the higher the mass, the older the age of the stellar population. [Abridged]
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.