Remark on a theorem in Mumford's Red Book of Varieties and Schemes
classification
🧮 math.AG
keywords
bookmumfordpointproofsectiontheoremalgebraicbump
read the original abstract
In this paper, we firstly point out, by a counter example, that Proposition 6.4 of Section 6 in Bump's book (Algebraic Geometry) is error, and then give a correct statement with proof. We finally point out a gap in the proof of Theorem 3, in Chapter I Section 8, of Mumford's red book, and indicate a way to complete it.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.