pith. sign in

arxiv: 1612.07863 · v2 · pith:WD32GLAInew · submitted 2016-12-23 · 💻 cs.DL · cs.HC· cs.SI

Anatomy of Scholarly Information Behavior Patterns in the Wake of Academic Social Media Platforms

classification 💻 cs.DL cs.HCcs.SI
keywords scholarlyresearchersbehaviorinformationsocialacademicanalysisdigital
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:WD32GLAI Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{WD32GLAI}

Prints a linked pith:WD32GLAI badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

As more scholarly content is born digital or converted to a digital format, digital libraries are becoming increasingly vital to researchers seeking to leverage scholarly big data for scientific discovery. Although scholarly products are available in abundance-especially in environments created by the advent of social networking services-little is known about international scholarly information needs, information-seeking behavior, or information use. The purpose of this paper is to address these gaps via an in-depth analysis of the information needs and information-seeking behavior of researchers, both students and faculty, at two universities, one in the U.S. and the other in Qatar. Based on this analysis, the study identifies and describes new behavior patterns on the part of researchers as they engage in the information-seeking process. The analysis reveals that the use of academic social networks has notable effects on various scholarly activities. Further, this study identifies differences between students and faculty members in regard to their use of academic social networks, and it identifies differences between researchers according to discipline. Although the researchers who participated in the present study represent a range of disciplinary and cultural backgrounds, the study reports a number of similarities in terms of the researchers' scholarly activities.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.