pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1707.04759 · v1 · submitted 2017-07-15 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Recognition: unknown

Primordial non-Gaussianity with μ-type and y-type spectral distortions: exploiting Cosmic Microwave Background polarization and dealing with secondary sources

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords distortionsprimordialsignaltemplatetextachieveaddingbackground
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Cross-correlations between Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) temperature and $y$-spectral distortions anisotropies have been previously proposed as a way to measure the local bispectrum parameter $f_{\rm NL}^{\rm loc.}$ in a range of scales inaccessible to either CMB ($T$, $E$) bispectra or $T$-$\mu$ correlations. This is useful e.g. to test scale dependence of primordial non-Gaussianity. Unfortunately, the primordial $y$-T signal is strongly contaminated by the late-time correlation between the Integrated Sachs Wolfe and Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effects. Moreover, SZ itself generates a large noise contribution in the $y$-parameter map. We consider two original ways to address these issues. In order to remove the bias due to the SZ-CMB temperature coupling, while also adding new signal, we include in the analysis the cross-correlation between $y$-distortions and CMB {\em polarization}. In order to reduce the noise, we propose to clean the $y$-map by subtracting a SZ template, reconstructed via cross-correlation with external tracers (CMB and galaxy-lensing signals). We combine this SZ template subtraction with the previously adopted solution of directly masking detected clusters. Our final forecasts show that, using $y$-distortions, a PRISM-like survey can achieve $1\sigma(f_{\rm NL}^\text{loc.}) = 300$, while an ideal experiment will achieve $1\sigma(f_{\rm NL}^\text{loc.}) = 130$, with improvements of a factor $\sim 3$ from adding the $y$-$E$ signal, and a further $20-30 \%$ from template cleaning. These forecasts are much worse than current $f_{\rm NL}^\text{loc.}$ boundaries from {\em Planck}, but we stress again that they refer to completely different scales.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.