pith. sign in

arxiv: 1709.06690 · v1 · pith:SYBK6WQUnew · submitted 2017-09-20 · ⚛️ physics.soc-ph · cs.SI

Social Network Differences of Chronotypes Identified from Mobile Phone Data

classification ⚛️ physics.soc-ph cs.SI
keywords socialowlschronotypesnetworkbehaviordatalarksless
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Human activity follows an approximately 24-hour day-night cycle, but there is significant individual variation in awake and sleep times. Individuals with circadian rhythms at the extremes can be categorized into two chronotypes: "larks", those who wake up and go to sleep early, and "owls", those who stay up and wake up late. It is well established that a person's chronotype can affect their activities and health. However, less is known on the effects of chronotypes on the social behavior, even though it is evident that social interactions require coordinated timings. To study how chronotypes relate to social behavior, we use data collected using a smartphone app on a population of more than seven hundred volunteer students to simultaneously determine their chronotypes and social network structure. We find that owls maintain larger personal networks, albeit with less time spent per contact. On average, owls are more central in the social network of students than larks, frequently occupying the dense core of the network. Owls also display strong homophily, as seen in an unexpectedly large number of social ties connecting owls to owls.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.