Supersaturated sparse graphs and hypergraphs
Add this Pith Number to your LaTeX paper
What is a Pith Number?\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{WACC2BOC}
Prints a linked pith:WACC2BOC badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more
read the original abstract
A central problem in extremal graph theory is to estimate, for a given graph $H$, the number of $H$-free graphs on a given set of $n$ vertices. In the case when $H$ is not bipartite, fairly precise estimates on this number are known. In particular, thirty years ago, Erd\H{o}s, Frankl, and R\"odl proved that there are $2^{(1+o(1))\text{ex}(n,H)}$ such graphs. In the bipartite case, however, nontrivial bounds have been proven only for relatively few special graphs $H$. We make a first attempt at addressing this enumeration problem for a general bipartite graph $H$. We show that an upper bound of $2^{O(\text{ex}(n,H))}$ on the number of $H$-free graphs with $n$ vertices follows merely from a rather natural assumption on the growth rate of $n \mapsto \text{ex}(n,H)$; an analogous statement remains true when $H$ is a uniform hypergraph. Subsequently, we derive several new results, along with most previously known estimates, as simple corollaries of our theorem. At the heart of our proof lies a general supersaturation statement that extends the seminal work of Erd\H{o}s and Simonovits. The bounds on the number of $H$-free hypergraphs are derived from it using the method of hypergraph containers.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.