arxiv: 1711.06838 · v2 · pith:XWGQKNL7new · submitted 2017-11-18 · ⚛️ physics.ins-det · hep-ex

A comparative study of alternative methods to determine the response of poly-ethylene terephthalate nuclear track detector

R. Bhattacharyya , S. Dey , Sanjay K. Ghosh , Akhil Jhingan , A. Maulik , L. Patrizii , Sibaji Raha , D. Syam

show 1 more author

V. Togo

This is my paper

classification ⚛️ physics.ins-det hep-ex

keywords detectormethodsnuclearpoly-ethyleneterephthalatetrackalternativeapplication

0 comments p. Extension

Add this Pith Number to your LaTeX paper

What is a Pith Number?

\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{XWGQKNL7}

Prints a linked pith:XWGQKNL7 badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

Two widely used methods of determining the etch-rate ratio in poly-ethylene terephthalate (PET) nuclear track detector are compared. Their application in different regimes of ion$\textquoteright$s energy loss is investigated. A new calibration curve for PET is also presented.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

A comparative study of alternative methods to determine the response of poly-ethylene terephthalate nuclear track detector

discussion (0)