arxiv: 1803.01527 · v1 · pith:R5RADTQFnew · submitted 2018-03-05 · 💰 econ.EM · q-fin.EC

A comment on 'Testing Goodwin: growth cycles in ten OECD countries'

Matheus R. Grasselli , Aditya Maheshwari This is my paper

classification 💰 econ.EM q-fin.EC

keywords estimatedharvieparametervaluesaveragecommentconclusionscorrecting

0 comments p. Extension

Add this Pith Number to your LaTeX paper

\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{R5RADTQF}

Prints a linked pith:R5RADTQF badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

We revisit the results of Harvie (2000) and show how correcting for a reporting mistake in some of the estimated parameter values leads to significantly different conclusions, including realistic parameter values for the Philips curve and estimated equilibrium employment rates exhibiting on average one tenth of the relative error of those obtained in Harvie (2000).

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

A comment on 'Testing Goodwin: growth cycles in ten OECD countries'

discussion (0)