pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1803.10349 · v1 · submitted 2018-03-27 · 🧮 math.CO · math.PR

Recognition: unknown

Dense Subgraphs in Random Graphs

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🧮 math.CO math.PR
keywords gammafracalphaomegagraphsintegersrandombinom
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

For a constant $\gamma \in[0,1]$ and a graph $G$, let $\omega_{\gamma}(G)$ be the largest integer $k$ for which there exists a $k$-vertex subgraph of $G$ with at least $\gamma\binom{k}{2}$ edges. We show that if $0<p<\gamma<1$ then $\omega_{\gamma}(G_{n,p})$ is concentrated on a set of two integers. More precisely, with $\alpha(\gamma,p)=\gamma\log\frac{\gamma}{p}+(1-\gamma)\log\frac{1-\gamma}{1-p}$, we show that $\omega_{\gamma}(G_{n,p})$ is one of the two integers closest to $\frac{2}{\alpha(\gamma,p)}\big(\log n-\log\log n+\log\frac{e\alpha(\gamma,p)}{2}\big)+\frac{1}{2}$, with high probability. While this situation parallels that of cliques in random graphs, a new technique is required to handle the more complicated ways in which these "quasi-cliques" may overlap.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.