Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Robust MIMO Radar Target Localization based on Lagrange Programming Neural Network

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1805.12300 v1 pith:JP35PZE4 submitted 2018-05-31 eess.SP

classification eess.SP
keywords targetfunctionlocalizationprobleml1-normlpnnobjectiveaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper focuses on target localization in a widely distributed multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) radar system. In this system, range measurements, which include the sum of distances between transmitter and target and the distances from the target to receivers, are used. We can obtain an accurate estimated position of the target by minimizing the measurement errors. In order to make our model come closer to reality, we introduce two kinds of noises, namely, Gaussian noise and outliers. When we evaluate a target localization algorithm, its localization accuracy and computational complexity are two main criteria. To improve the positioning accuracy, the original problem is formulated as solving a non-smooth constrained optimization problem in which the objective function is either l1-norm or l0-norm term. To achieve a real-time solution, the Lagrange programming neural network (LPNN) is utilized to solve this problem. However, it is well known that LPNN requires twice-differentiable objective function and constraints. Obviously, the l1-norm or l0-norm term in the objective function does not satisfy this requirement. To address this non-smooth optimization problem, this paper proposes two modifications based on the LPNN framework. In the first method, a differentiable proximate l1-norm function is introduced. While in the second method, locally competitive algorithm is utilized. Simulation and experimental results demonstrate that the performance of the proposed algorithms outperforms several existing schemes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools