The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 1806.01272 · v2 · pith:3DMA3CNS · submitted 2018-06-04 · math.FA · math.OA

Interplay of Simple and Selfadjoint-Ideal Semigroups in B(H)

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:3DMA3CNSrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification math.FA math.OA
keywords semigroupssimplewhenoperatorrankcasecharacterizationequivalent
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This paper investigates a question of Radjavi: Which multiplicative semigroups in B(H) have all their ideals selfadjoint (called herein selfadjoint-ideal (SI) semigroups)? We proved this property is a unitary invariant for B(H)-semigroups, which invariant we believe is new. We characterize those SI semigroups S singly generated by T, for T a normal operator and for T a rank one operator. When T is nonselfadjoint and normal or rank one: S is an SI semigroup if and only if it is simple, except in one special rank one partial isometry case when our characterization yields S that are SI but not simple. So SI and simplicity are not equivalent notions. When T is selfadjoint, it is straightforward to see that S is always an SI semigroup, but we prove by examples they may or may not be simple, but for this case we do not have a characterization. The study of SI semigroups involves solving certain operator equations in the semigroups. A central theme of this paper is to study when and when not SI is equivalent to simple.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.