pith. sign in

arxiv: 1807.03860 · v2 · pith:4NBFEHDHnew · submitted 2018-07-10 · 📊 stat.AP

A Cautionary Tail: A Framework and Case Study for Testing Predictive Model Validity

classification 📊 stat.AP
keywords datamodelmodelsfieldpredictiveassessmentframeworkpredicting
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Data scientists frequently train predictive models on administrative data. However, the process that generates this data can bias predictive models, making it important to test models against their intended use. We provide a field assessment framework that we use to validate a model predicting rat infestations in Washington, D.C. The model was developed with data from the city's 311 service request system. Although the model performs well against new 311 data, we find that it does not perform well when predicting the outcomes of inspections in our field assessment. We recommend that data scientists expand the use of field assessments to test their models.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.