pith. sign in

arxiv: 1807.04606 · v1 · pith:FJME5GESnew · submitted 2018-07-12 · 💻 cs.HC

A Survey Investigating Usage of Virtual Personal Assistants

classification 💻 cs.HC
keywords usagevpasassistantsusersfrequentinfrequentpersonalprivacy
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Despite significant improvements in automatic speech recognition and spoken language understanding - human interaction with Virtual Personal Assistants (VPAs) through speech remains irregular and sporadic. According to recent studies, currently the usage of VPAs is constrained to basic tasks such as checking facts, playing music, and obtaining weather updates.In this paper, we present results of a survey (N = 118) that analyses usage of VPAs by frequent and infrequent users. We investigate how usage experience, performance expectations, and privacy concerns differ between these two groups. The results indicate that, compared with infrequent users, frequent users of VPAs are more satisfied with their assistants, more eager to use them in a variety of settings, yet equally concerned about their privacy.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mapping Perceptions of Humanness in Speech-Based Intelligent Personal Assistant Interaction

    cs.HC 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Perceptions of humanness in speech-based IPAs are multidimensional, with users viewing the assistants as more formal, fact-based, impersonal, and less authentic than humans across eight identified themes.