The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 1807.07724 · v4 · pith:UUBPWRM5 · submitted 2018-07-20 · cs.DC

Apache Spark Streaming, Kafka and HarmonicIO: A Performance Benchmark and Architecture Comparison for Enterprise and Scientific Computing

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:UUBPWRM5record.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.DC
keywords performancestreamstreamingharmonicioloadsprocessingsparkapache
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This paper presents a benchmark of stream processing throughput comparing Apache Spark Streaming (under file-, TCP socket- and Kafka-based stream integration), with a prototype P2P stream processing framework, HarmonicIO. Maximum throughput for a spectrum of stream processing loads are measured, specifically, those with large message sizes (up to 10MB), and heavy CPU loads -- more typical of scientific computing use cases (such as microscopy), than enterprise contexts. A detailed exploration of the performance characteristics with these streaming sources, under varying loads, reveals an interplay of performance trade-offs, uncovering the boundaries of good performance for each framework and streaming source integration. We compare with theoretic bounds in each case. Based on these results, we suggest which frameworks and streaming sources are likely to offer good performance for a given load. Broadly, the advantages of Spark's rich feature set comes at a cost of sensitivity to message size in particular -- common stream source integrations can perform poorly in the 1MB-10MB range. The simplicity of HarmonicIO offers more robust performance in this region, especially for raw CPU utilization.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.