pith. sign in

arxiv: 1808.03781 · v1 · pith:LMQ6ST4Gnew · submitted 2018-08-11 · ⚛️ physics.soc-ph · cs.SI

Reciprocity and success in academic careers

classification ⚛️ physics.soc-ph cs.SI
keywords reciprocitycitationsacademicbeencareerscitation-basedimpactindicators
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The growing importance of citation-based bibliometric indicators in shaping the prospects of academic careers incentivizes scientists to boost the numbers of citations they receive. Whereas the exploitation of self-citations has been extensively documented, the impact of reciprocated citations has not yet been studied. We study reciprocity in a citation network of authors, and compare it with the average reciprocity computed in an ensemble of null network models. We show that obtaining citations through reciprocity correlates negatively with a successful career in the long term. Nevertheless, at the aggregate level we show evidence of a steady increase in reciprocity over the years, largely fuelled by the exchange of citations between coauthors. Our results characterize the structure of author networks in a time of increasing emphasis on citation-based indicators, and we discuss their implications towards a fairer assessment of academic impact.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.