Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Deep Neural Networks with Weighted Averaged Overnight Airflow Features for Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Severity Classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1808.10845 v1 pith:56CK3623 submitted 2018-08-31 eess.SP physics.med-ph

classification eess.SPphysics.med-ph
keywords classificationsahsproposedsleepaccuracyapnea-hypopneaapproachesdeep
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Dramatic raising of Deep Learning (DL) approach and its capability in biomedical applications lead us to explore the advantages of using DL for sleep Apnea-Hypopnea severity classification. To reduce the complexity of clinical diagnosis using Polysomnography (PSG), which is multiple sensing platform, we incorporates our proposed DL scheme into one single Airflow (AF) sensing signal (subset of PSG). Seventeen features have been extracted from AF and then fed into Deep Neural Networks to classify in two studies. First, we proposed a binary classifications which use the cutoff indices at AHI = 5, 15 and 30 events/hour. Second, the multiple Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome (SAHS) severity classification was proposed to classify patients into 4 groups including no SAHS, mild SAHS, moderate SAHS, and severe SAHS. For methods evaluation, we used a higher number of patients than related works to accommodate more diversity which includes 520 AF records obtained from the MrOS sleep study (Visit 2) database. We then applied the 10-fold cross-validation technique to get the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. Moreover, we compared the results from our main classifier with other two approaches which were used in previous researches including the Support Vector Machine (SVM) and the Adaboost-Classification and Regression Trees (AB-CART). From the binary classification, our proposed method provides significantly higher performance than other two approaches with the accuracy of 83.46 %, 85.39 % and 92.69 % in each cutoff, respectively. For the multiclass classification, it also returns a highest accuracy of all approaches with 63.70 %.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools