pith. sign in

arxiv: 1812.03053 · v1 · pith:AD7XL5TWnew · submitted 2018-12-07 · 🧮 math.AP

Do we need Truesdell's empirical inequalities? On the coaxiality of stress and stretch

classification 🧮 math.AP
keywords inequalitiesempiricalconstitutivestresstruesdellarisingavailablebaker-ericksen
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Truesdell's empirical inequalities are considered essential in various fields of nonlinear elasticity. However, they are often used merely as a sufficient criterion for semi-invertibility of the isotropic stress strain-relation, even though weaker and much less restricting constitutive requirements like the strict Baker-Ericksen inequalities are available for this purpose. We elaborate the relations between such constitutive conditions, including a weakened version of the empirical inequalities, and their connection to bi-coaxiality and related matrix properties. In particular, we discuss a number of issues arising from the seemingly ubiquitous use of the phrase "$X,Y$ have the same eigenvectors" when referring to commuting symmetric tensors $X,Y$.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.