Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A review and evaluation of the use of longitudinal approaches in business surveys

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1903.06626 v2 pith:VUJDD66K submitted 2019-02-14 stat.AP stat.ME

classification stat.APstat.ME
keywords surveysbusinesslongitudinaldesignimproveapproachesestimatesreview
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Business surveys are not generally considered to be longitudinal by design. However, the largest businesses are almost always included in each wave of recurrent surveys because they are essential for producing good estimates; and short-period business surveys frequently make use of rotating panel designs to improve the estimates of change by inducing sample overlaps between different periods. These design features mean that business surveys share some methodological challenges with longitudinal surveys. We review the longitudinal methods and approaches which can be used to improve the design and operation of business surveys, giving examples of their use. We also look in the other direction, considering the aspects of longitudinal analysis which have the potential to improve the accuracy, relevance and interpretation of business survey outputs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools