pith. sign in

arxiv: 1904.11285 · v1 · pith:LEV62YAInew · submitted 2019-04-25 · 💻 cs.DS · cs.CC· cs.DM

Detecting and Counting Small Patterns in Planar Graphs in Subexponential Parameterized Time

classification 💻 cs.DS cs.CCcs.DM
keywords timealgorithmcopiesalgorithmsplanarcountinggraphgraphs
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We present an algorithm that takes as input an $n$-vertex planar graph $G$ and a $k$-vertex pattern graph $P$, and computes the number of (induced) copies of $P$ in $G$ in $2^{O(k/\log k)}n^{O(1)}$ time. If $P$ is a matching, independent set, or connected bounded maximum degree graph, the runtime reduces to $2^{\tilde{O}(\sqrt{k})}n^{O(1)}$. While our algorithm counts all copies of $P$, it also improves the fastest algorithms that only detect copies of $P$. Before our work, no $2^{O(k/\log k)}n^{O(1)}$ time algorithms for detecting unrestricted patterns $P$ were known, and by a result of Bodlaender et al. [ICALP 2016] a $2^{o(k/\log k)}n^{O(1)}$ time algorithm would violate the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH). Furthermore, it was only known how to detect copies of a fixed connected bounded maximum degree pattern $P$ in $2^{\tilde{O}(\sqrt{k})}n^{O(1)}$ time probabilistically. For counting problems, it was a repeatedly asked open question whether $2^{o(k)}n^{O(1)}$ time algorithms exist that count even special patterns such as independent sets, matchings and paths in planar graphs. The above results resolve this question in a strong sense by giving algorithms for counting versions of problems with running times equal to the ETH lower bounds for their decision versions. Generally speaking, our algorithm counts copies of $P$ in time proportional to its number of non-isomorphic separations of order $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{k})$. The algorithm introduces a new recursive approach to construct families of balanced cycle separators in planar graphs that have limited overlap inspired by methods from Fomin et al. [FOCS 2016], a new `efficient' inclusion-exclusion based argument and uses methods from Bodlaender et al. [ICALP 2016].

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.