pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1905.02813 · v1 · submitted 2019-05-07 · 💻 cs.HC

Recognition: unknown

Fixing Inclusivity Bugs for Information Processing Styles and Learning Styles

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.HC
keywords softwarestylesinclusivitybugsgenderproblem-solvingcognitivediversity
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Most software systems today do not support cognitive diversity. Further, because of differences in problem-solving styles that cluster by gender, software that poorly supports cognitive diversity can also embed gender biases. To help software professionals fix gender bias "bugs" related to people's problem-solving styles for information processing and learning of new software we collected inclusivity fixes from three sources. The first two are empirical studies we conducted: a heuristics-driven user study and a field research industry study. The third is data that we obtained about a before/after user study of inclusivity bugs. The resulting seven potential inclusivity fixes show how to debug software to be more inclusive for diverse problem-solving styles.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.