pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1905.05635 · v1 · submitted 2019-05-13 · 💻 cs.DL · math.HO

Recognition: unknown

On the share of mathematics published by Elsevier and Springer

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.DL math.HO
keywords elsevierpublishedsharespringerarticleseditorsjournalsperiod
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

For-profit editors such as Elsevier and Springer have been subject to sustained criticism from academics and university libraries, including calls to boycott, and discontinued subscriptions. Mathematicians have played a particularly active role in this critique, and have endeavored to imagine new publication practices and create new journals. This motivates the monitoring of the share of articles published by different editors. I used data from MathSciNet over the period 2000-2017, and focused on the 100 journals with highest citations per article. Within this category, the share of articles published by Elsevier and Springer has steadily increased over this period, from about a third to almost half of the total.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.