pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.10874 · v1 · pith:Y5E3RMORnew · submitted 2019-06-26 · 🧮 math.AP

Well-posedness and regularity for a fractional tumor growth model

Pierluigi Colli , Gianni Gilardi , J\"urgen Sprekels This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 15:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP
keywords tumor growth modelfractional operatorswell-posednessregularityCahn-Hilliard equationvariational inequalityphase field
0
0 comments X

The pith

A fractional generalization of a tumor growth phase-field model admits well-posed solutions with regularity even for singular energy densities.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes well-posedness and regularity for a system of three evolutionary equations modeling tumor growth, where diffusion is governed by fractional powers of linear operators. This setup generalizes prior Cahn-Hilliard type models by permitting possibly different fractional diffusional regimes for tumor cells and nutrients. Reformulating the chemical potential equation as a variational inequality extends the results to singular or nonsmooth energy contributions such as logarithmic or double-obstacle types. These findings supply a rigorous basis for studying the coupled dynamics of tumor cell fraction and nutrient volume fraction under relaxed smoothness requirements on the potentials.

Core claim

Under general assumptions on three self-adjoint monotone unbounded linear operators with compact resolvents, the system consisting of a fractional Cahn-Hilliard equation for the tumor cell fraction, a reaction-diffusion equation for the nutrient volume fraction, and an equation for the chemical potential has a unique solution possessing specified regularity properties. The variational inequality formulation of the chemical potential equation permits the inclusion of singular or nonsmooth contributions to the energy density.

What carries the argument

The abstract system of three evolutionary operator equations involving fractional powers of the given operators, with the chemical potential equation cast as a general variational inequality.

If this is right

  • The model remains well-posed when the diffusional regimes for the tumor cell fraction and nutrient fraction are of different fractional type.
  • Logarithmic and double-obstacle contributions to the energy density are admissible without loss of existence or uniqueness.
  • Regularity properties hold that allow direct analysis of the evolution of the tumor cell fraction and the extracellular water volume fraction.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The abstract framework may transfer to other biological or materials models that incorporate anomalous diffusion through fractional operators.
  • Varying the fractional exponents independently could produce observable differences in predicted tumor invasion speeds or nutrient consumption rates.
  • The compactness assumption on the resolvents supplies the spectral properties needed to obtain the existence results via Galerkin approximation or fixed-point arguments.

Load-bearing premise

The three operators are selfadjoint, monotone, unbounded, linear operators having compact resolvents so that fractional powers are well-defined and abstract variational methods apply.

What would settle it

A specific triple of operators without compact resolvents, or a potential violating the growth conditions, for which the system has either no solution or multiple solutions.

read the original abstract

In this paper, we study a system of three evolutionary operator equations involving fractional powers of selfadjoint, monotone, unbounded, linear operators having compact resolvents. This system constitutes a generalization of a phase field system of Cahn-Hilliard type modelling tumor growth that has been proposed in Hawkins-Daarud et al. (Int. J. Numer. Math. Biomed. Eng. 28 (2012), 3-24) and investigated in recent papers co-authored by the present authors and E. Rocca. The model consists of a Cahn-Hilliard equation for the tumor cell fraction, coupled to a reaction-diffusion equation for a function S representing the nutrient-rich extracellular water volume fraction. Effects due to fluid motion are neglected. The generalization investigated in this paper is motivated by the possibility that the diffusional regimes governing the evolution of the different constituents of the model may be of different (e.g., fractional) type. Under rather general assumptions, well-posedness and regularity results are shown. In particular, by writing the equation governing the evolution of the chemical potential in the form of a general variational inequality, also singular or nonsmooth contributions of logarithmic or of double obstacle type to the energy density can be admitted.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a coupled system of three evolutionary equations involving fractional powers of self-adjoint, monotone, unbounded linear operators with compact resolvents. This generalizes a Cahn-Hilliard-type phase-field tumor-growth model (with tumor-cell fraction and nutrient variable S) by allowing possibly different fractional diffusivities. Under stated general assumptions on the operators, well-posedness and regularity are proved; the chemical-potential equation is recast as a variational inequality to accommodate singular (logarithmic or double-obstacle) contributions to the energy.

Significance. If the results hold, the work supplies a rigorous abstract framework that extends prior tumor-growth analyses to fractional regimes and nonsmooth potentials via variational inequalities. The use of standard operator hypotheses (self-adjointness, monotonicity, compact resolvents) to invoke known existence theory for variational inequalities is a methodological strength that keeps the argument modular and reusable.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph 2: the central well-posedness claim rests on the three operators being self-adjoint, monotone, unbounded, linear and possessing compact resolvents so that fractional powers are well-defined; the manuscript must explicitly verify that the concrete coupling terms (reaction kinetics between the tumor fraction and S) preserve the required monotonicity and domain compatibility when the operators are replaced by their fractional powers.
  2. [Main existence theorem (likely §3 or §4)] The variational-inequality reformulation for the chemical potential (used to admit logarithmic or obstacle potentials) is invoked via abstract theory; the paper must confirm that the time-dependent forcing arising from the other two equations satisfies the integrability and monotonicity hypotheses of the cited existence theorem for the inequality, otherwise the passage from the abstract result to the coupled system is not justified.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Preliminaries / notation section] Notation for the fractional powers A^α, B^β, C^γ should include explicit statements of the domains and the precise definition of the graph norm used for the fractional spaces.
  2. [Regularity results] The regularity statements (e.g., Hölder or Sobolev regularity of solutions) should be stated with the precise exponents that follow from the abstract theory rather than left in qualitative form.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph 2: the central well-posedness claim rests on the three operators being self-adjoint, monotone, unbounded, linear and possessing compact resolvents so that fractional powers are well-defined; the manuscript must explicitly verify that the concrete coupling terms (reaction kinetics between the tumor fraction and S) preserve the required monotonicity and domain compatibility when the operators are replaced by their fractional powers.

    Authors: The listed properties (self-adjointness, monotonicity, compact resolvent) are hypotheses imposed directly on the linear operators and are preserved under fractional powers by the standard theory recalled in Section 2. The reaction kinetics appear only as nonlinear lower-order terms on the right-hand side and are treated via the variational inequality and a fixed-point argument; they do not modify the linearity or monotonicity of the diffusion operators themselves. To address the request for explicit verification we will add one clarifying sentence in the introduction stating that the coupling terms are compatible with the abstract operator framework. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Main existence theorem (likely §3 or §4)] The variational-inequality reformulation for the chemical potential (used to admit logarithmic or obstacle potentials) is invoked via abstract theory; the paper must confirm that the time-dependent forcing arising from the other two equations satisfies the integrability and monotonicity hypotheses of the cited existence theorem for the inequality, otherwise the passage from the abstract result to the coupled system is not justified.

    Authors: After obtaining the uniform a priori bounds from the energy inequality, the proof verifies that the time-dependent forcing term (arising from the coupling with the tumor-fraction and nutrient equations) lies in the required Bochner space and satisfies the monotonicity condition of the abstract theorem by direct estimation using the growth assumptions on the potentials. This check is performed before passing to the limit in the Galerkin approximation. We will nevertheless insert a short remark immediately after the statement of the abstract existence result to make the verification of the hypotheses for our specific forcing term fully explicit. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard existence proof from stated operator assumptions

full rationale

The derivation consists of an abstract existence and regularity proof for a fractional Cahn-Hilliard-type system. The load-bearing hypotheses (three operators are self-adjoint, monotone, unbounded, linear with compact resolvents) are introduced explicitly as assumptions in the abstract framework, not derived from or equivalent to the well-posedness result itself. The argument then invokes standard variational inequality theory to accommodate logarithmic or obstacle potentials. Self-citations to earlier tumor-growth papers supply model motivation and context but are not used to justify uniqueness or to close any definitional loop; the fractional extension is treated directly via the stated operator properties. No fitted parameters, self-definitional reductions, or ansatzes smuggled via citation occur. The result is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the stated operator properties and the ability to recast the chemical-potential equation as a variational inequality; no free parameters or new entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The three linear operators are selfadjoint, monotone, unbounded and possess compact resolvents.
    Invoked in the abstract to guarantee that fractional powers exist and the abstract theory applies.
  • domain assumption The system can be written with the chemical-potential equation in variational-inequality form.
    This is the key technical step that permits singular potentials; stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5753 in / 1428 out tokens · 40309 ms · 2026-05-25T15:54:04.308348+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Nonlinear Differential Equations of Monotone Type in B anach Spaces

    V. Barbu, “Nonlinear Differential Equations of Monotone Type in B anach Spaces”, Springer, London, New York, 2010

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Op´ erateurs maximaux monotones et semi-groupes de contractions dans les espaces de Hilbert

    H. Brezis, “Op´ erateurs maximaux monotones et semi-groupes de contractions dans les espaces de Hilbert”, North-Holland Math. Stud. 5, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973

    work page 1973

  3. [3]

    Bellomo, N

    N. Bellomo, N. K. Li, P. K. Maini, On the foundations of cancer mode lling: selected topics, speculations, and perspectives, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 18 (2008), 593–646

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Bosia, M

    S. Bosia, M. Conti, M. Grasselli, On the Cahn–Hilliard–Brinkman syst em, Commun. Math. Sci. 13 (2015), 1541–1567

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    J. W. Cahn, J. E. Hilliard, Free energy of a nonuniform system. I. Interfacial free energy, J. Chem. Phys. 28 (1958), 258–267

    work page 1958

  6. [6]

    Cavaterra, E

    C. Cavaterra, E. Rocca, H. Wu, Long-time dynamics and optimal control of a diffuse interface model for tumor growth, Appl. Math. Optim. (2019), Online First 15 March 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-019-09562-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s00245-019-09562-5 2019

  7. [7]

    Y. Chen, S. M. Wise, V. B. Shenoy, J. S. Lowengrub, A stable sch eme for a nonlinear multiphase tumor growth model with an elastic membrane, Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng. 30 (2014), 726–754

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Well-posedness, regularity and asymptotic analyses for a fractional phase field system

    P. Colli, G. Gilardi, Well-posedness, regularity and asymptotic analy ses for a fractional phase field system, Asymptot. Anal. , to appear (see also preprint arXiv:1806.04625 [math.AP] (2018), pp. 1–34)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    Colli, G

    P. Colli, G. Gilardi, D. Hilhorst, On a Cahn–Hilliard type phase field syst em related to tumor growth, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 35 (2015), 2423–2442

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Colli, G

    P. Colli, G. Gilardi, G. Marinoschi, E. Rocca, Sliding mode control fo r a phase field system related to tumor growth. Appl. Math. Optim. 79 (2019), 647–670

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Colli, G

    P. Colli, G. Gilardi, E. Rocca, J. Sprekels, Vanishing viscosities and error estimate for a Cahn–Hilliard type phase field system related to tumor growth, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 26 (2015), 93–108

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    Colli, G

    P. Colli, G. Gilardi, E. Rocca, J. Sprekels, Asymptotic analyses an d error estimates for a Cahn–Hilliard type phase field system modelling tumor growth, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S. 10 (2017), 37–54

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    Colli, G

    P. Colli, G. Gilardi, E. Rocca, J. Sprekels, Optimal distributed con trol of a diffuse interface model of tumor growth, Nonlinearity 30 (2017), 2518–2546

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    Colli, G

    P. Colli, G. Gilardi, J. Sprekels, Well-posedness and regularity for a generalized fractional Cahn–Hilliard system, Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Rend. Lincei Mat. Appl. , to appear (see also preprint arXiv:1804.11290 [math.AP] (2018), pp . 1–36). 30 Colli — Gilardi — Sprekels

    work page arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    Colli, G

    P. Colli, G. Gilardi, J. Sprekels, Optimal distributed control of a g eneralized frac- tional Cahn–Hilliard system, Appl. Math. Optim. , Online First 15 November 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-018-9540-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s00245-018-9540-7 2018

  16. [16]

    Colli, G

    P. Colli, G. Gilardi, J. Sprekels, Longtime behavior for a generalize d Cahn–Hilliard system with fractional operators, preprint arXiv:1904.00931 [mat h.AP] (2019), pp. 1– 18

    work page arXiv 1904

  17. [17]

    Conti, A

    M. Conti, A. Giorgini, The three-dimensional Cahn–Hilliard–Brinkm an system with unmatched viscosities, preprint hal-01559179 (2018), pp. 1–34

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Cristini, X

    V. Cristini, X. Li, J. S. Lowengrub, S. M. Wise, Nonlinear simulation s of solid tumor growth using a mixture model: invasion and branching, J. Math. Biol. 58 (2009), 723–763

    work page 2009

  19. [19]

    Multiscale Modeling of Cancer: an I ntegrated Experi- mental and Mathematical Modeling Approach

    V. Cristini, J. S. Lowengrub, “Multiscale Modeling of Cancer: an I ntegrated Experi- mental and Mathematical Modeling Approach”, Cambridge Univ. Pre ss, Cambridge, 2010

    work page 2010

  20. [20]

    M. Dai, E. Feireisl, E. Rocca, G. Schimperna, M. Schonbek, Analy sis of a diffuse interface model for multi-species tumor growth, Nonlinearity 30 (2017), 1639–1658

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    Della Porta, M

    F. Della Porta, M. Grasselli, On the nonlocal Cahn–Hilliard–Brinkma n and Cahn– Hilliard–Hele–Shaw systems, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 15 (2016), 299–317, Erra- tum: Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 16 (2017), 369–372

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    Ebenbeck, H

    M. Ebenbeck, H. Garcke, Analysis of a Cahn–Hilliard–Brinkman mo del for tumour growth with chemotaxis, J. Differential Equations 266 (2019), 5998–6036

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    Complex Systems in Biomedicine

    A. Fasano, A. Bertuzzi, A. Gandolfi, Mathematical modeling of t umour growth and treatment, in “Complex Systems in Biomedicine”, A. Quarteroni, L. F ormaggia, A. Veneziani (ed.), Springer, Milan, 2006, pp. 71–108

    work page 2006

  24. [24]

    X. Feng, S. M. Wise, Analysis of a Darcy–Cahn–Hilliard diffuse inter face model for the Hele–Shaw flow and its fully discrete finite element approximation, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 50 (2012), 1320–1343

    work page 2012

  25. [25]

    Friedman, Mathematical analysis and challenges arising from m odels of tumor growth, Math

    A. Friedman, Mathematical analysis and challenges arising from m odels of tumor growth, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 17 (2007), 1751–1772

    work page 2007

  26. [26]

    H. B. Frieboes, F. Jin, Y. L. Chuang, S. M. Wise, J. S. Lowengru b, V. Cristini, Three-dimensional multispecies nonlinear tumor growth - II: tumor invasion and angiogenesis, J. Theoret. Biol. 264 (2010), 1254–1278

    work page 2010

  27. [27]

    Frigeri, M

    S. Frigeri, M. Grasselli, E. Rocca, On a diffuse interface model of tumor growth, European J. Appl. Math. 26 (2015), 215–243

    work page 2015

  28. [28]

    Solvability, regularity, and optimal control of boundary value problems for PDEs

    S. Frigeri, K. F. Lam, E. Rocca, On a diffuse interface model for tumour growth with non-local interactions and degenerate mobilities, in “Solvability, regularity, and optimal control of boundary value problems for PDEs”, P. Colli, A. F avini, E. Rocca, G. Schimperna, J. Sprekels (ed.), Springer INdAM Series 22, Springer, Cham, 2017, pp. 217–254. Generaliz...

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    Frigeri, K

    S. Frigeri, K. F. Lam, E. Rocca, G. Schimperna, On a multi-specie s Cahn–Hilliard– Darcy tumor growth model with singular potentials, Commun. Math Sci. 16 (2018), 821–856

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Garcke, K

    H. Garcke, K. F. Lam, Global weak solutions and asymptotic limits of a Cahn– Hilliard–Darcy system modelling tumour growth, AIMS Mathematics 1 (2016), 318– 360

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    Garcke, K

    H. Garcke, K. F. Lam, Analysis of a Cahn–Hilliard system with non– zero Dirichlet conditions modeling tumor growth with chemotaxis, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 37 (2017), 4277–4308

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Garcke, K

    H. Garcke, K. F. Lam, Well-posedness of a Cahn–Hilliard system m odelling tumour growth with chemotaxis and active transport, European. J. Appl. Math. 28 (2017), 284–316

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Trends on Applications of Mat hematics to Me- chanics

    H. Garcke, K. F. Lam, On a Cahn–Hilliard–Darcy system for tumo ur growth with solution dependent source terms, in “Trends on Applications of Mat hematics to Me- chanics”, E. Rocca, U. Stefanelli, L. Truskinovski, A. Visintin (ed.), Springer INdAM Series 27, Springer, Cham, 2018, pp. 243–264

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Garcke, K

    H. Garcke, K. F. Lam, R. N¨ urnberg, E. Sitka, A multiphase Cah n–Hilliard–Darcy model for tumour growth with necrosis, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 28 (2018), 525–577

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Garcke, K

    H. Garcke, K. F. Lam, E. Rocca, Optimal control of treatmen t time in a diffuse interface model for tumour growth, Appl. Math. Optim. 78 (2018), 495–544

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Garcke, K

    H. Garcke, K. F. Lam, E. Sitka, V. Styles, A Cahn–Hilliard–Darcy model for tumour growth with chemotaxis and active transport, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 26 (2016), 1095–1148

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    Giorgini, M

    A. Giorgini, M. Grasselli, H. Wu, The Cahn–Hilliard–Hele–Shaw syste m with singular potential, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire35 (2018), 1079–1118

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    Hawkins-Daarud, S

    A. Hawkins-Daarud, S. Prudhomme, K. G. van der Zee, J. T. Od en, Bayesian calibra- tion, validation, and uncertainty quantification of diffuse interface models of tumor growth, J. Math. Biol. 67 (2013), 1457–1485

    work page 2013

  39. [39]

    Hawkins-Daarud, K

    A. Hawkins-Daarud, K. G. van der Zee, J. T. Oden, Numerical s imulation of a ther- modynamically consistent four-species tumor growth model, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Biomed. Engrg. 28 (2012), 3–24

    work page 2012

  40. [40]

    Hilhorst, J

    D. Hilhorst, J. Kampmann, T. N. Nguyen, K. G. van der Zee, For mal asymptotic limit of a diffuse-interface tumor-growth model, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 25 (2015), 1011–1043

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    Jiang, H

    J. Jiang, H. Wu, S. Zheng, Well-posedness and long-time behavio r of a non- autonomous Cahn–Hilliard–Darcy system with mass source modeling t umor growth, J. Differential Equations 259 (2015), 3032–3077. 32 Colli — Gilardi — Sprekels

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    Quelques M´ ethodes de R´ esolution des Probl` em es aux Limites non Lin´ eaires

    J.-L. Lions, “Quelques M´ ethodes de R´ esolution des Probl` em es aux Limites non Lin´ eaires”, Dunod; Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1969

    work page 1969

  43. [43]

    J. S. Lowengrub, E. S. Titi, K. Zhao, Analysis of a mixture model of tumor growth, European J. Appl. Math. 24 (2013), 691–734

    work page 2013

  44. [44]

    Miranville, E

    A. Miranville, E. Rocca, G. Schimperna, On the long time behavior o f a tumor growth model, J. Differential Equations 267 (2019) 2616–2642

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    J. T. Oden, A. Hawkins, S. Prudhomme, General diffuse-interf ace theories and an approach to predictive tumor growth modeling, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 20 (2010), 477–517

    work page 2010

  46. [46]

    Signori, Optimal distributed control of an extended model o f tumor growth with logarithmic potential, Appl

    A. Signori, Optimal distributed control of an extended model o f tumor growth with logarithmic potential, Appl. Math. Optim. , Online First 30 October 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-018-9538-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s00245-018-9538-1 2018

  47. [47]

    Signori, Optimal treatment for a phase field system of Cahn– Hilliard type mod- eling tumor growth by asymptotic scheme, preprint arXiv:1902.0107 9 [math.AP] (2019), pp

    A. Signori, Optimal treatment for a phase field system of Cahn– Hilliard type mod- eling tumor growth by asymptotic scheme, preprint arXiv:1902.0107 9 [math.AP] (2019), pp. 1–28

    work page arXiv 1902

  48. [48]

    Signori, Vanishing parameter for an optimal control problem modeling tumor growth, preprint arXiv:1903.04930 [math.AP] (2019), pp

    A. Signori, Vanishing parameter for an optimal control problem modeling tumor growth, preprint arXiv:1903.04930 [math.AP] (2019), pp. 1–22

    work page arXiv 1903

  49. [49]

    Sprekels, H

    J. Sprekels, H. Wu, Optimal distributed control of a Cahn–Hilliar d–Darcy sys- tem with mass sources, Appl. Math. Optim. , Online First 24 January 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-019-09555-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s00245-019-09555-4 2019

  50. [50]

    X.-M. Wang, H. Wu, Long-time behavior for the Hele–Shaw–Cahn –Hilliard system, Asymptot. Anal. 78 (2012), 217–245

    work page 2012

  51. [51]

    Wang, Z.-F

    X.-M. Wang, Z.-F. Zhang, Well-posedness of the Hele–Shaw–Cah n–Hilliard system, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire30 (2013), 367–384

    work page 2013

  52. [52]

    S. M. Wise, J. S. Lowengrub, V. Cristini, An adaptive multigrid algo rithm for simu- lating solid tumor growth using mixture models, Math. Comput. Modelling 53 (2011), 1–20

    work page 2011

  53. [53]

    S. M. Wise, J. S. Lowengrub, H. B. Frieboes, V. Cristini, Three- dimensional multi- species nonlinear tumor growth - I: model and numerical method, J. Theoret. Biol. 253 (2008), 524–543

    work page 2008

  54. [54]

    X. Wu, G. J. van Zwieten, K. G. van der Zee, Stabilized second-o rder splitting schemes for Cahn–Hilliard models with applications to diffuse-interfac e tumor-growth models, Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng. 30 (2014), 180–203

    work page 2014