pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.12145 · v1 · pith:M7ZKDLKZnew · submitted 2019-06-28 · 📡 eess.SP

Industrial Indoor Measurements from 2-6 GHz for the 3GPP-NR and QuaDRiGa Channel Model

Stephan Jaeckel , Nick Turay , Leszek Raschkowski , Lars Thiele , Risto Vuohtoniemi , Marko Sonkki , Veikko Hovinen , Frank Burkhardt
show 2 more authors
Prasanth Karunakaran Thomas Heyn
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 13:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords industrial indoorchannel measurementspropagation parametersQuaDRiGa3GPP-NRLOS NLOSscattering environmentdevice-to-device
0
0 comments X

The pith

Measurements at 2.37 GHz and 5.4 GHz in industrial halls extract statistical parameters for LOS and NLOS propagation to fill gaps in 3GPP-NR and QuaDRiGa models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper conducts measurements totaling 5.9 km of track at operational industrial sites to extract propagation parameters missing from current 3GPP-NR and QuaDRiGa models for industrial indoor scenarios. It finds that metallic walls and objects create a rich scattering environment with multipath components arriving from all directions. This environment supports robust communication links if transceivers can manage the resulting interference. The parameters enable accurate simulations for Industry 4.0 wireless systems on both link and system levels. The campaign also tests new features like device-to-device links and spatial consistency.

Core claim

Measurements at 2.37 GHz and 5.4 GHz in industrial premises extract statistical parameters for LOS and NLOS conditions, revealing a rich scattering environment from metallic structures that leads to multipath components from all directions and thus robust links when interference is handled.

What carries the argument

The extracted statistical model parameters for line-of-sight and non-line-of-sight propagation conditions from the measurement campaign.

If this is right

  • The parameters can be used in QuaDRiGa for link and system level simulations.
  • They support parameterization of device-to-device radio links and spatial consistency features.
  • They provide data for the industrial indoor scenario missing from 3GPP-NR models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The rich multipath environment could make industrial wireless links more reliable than in typical office or residential settings.
  • Similar measurements at other frequencies would extend applicability for future 5G and 6G factory networks.
  • These results imply that wireless systems for advanced manufacturing can achieve robustness with standard transceiver designs that mitigate interference.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen Siemens premises in Nuremberg represent typical industrial indoor environments.

What would settle it

A measurement campaign in a different industrial setting, such as one without metallic walls, yielding substantially different multipath statistics would falsify the generality of the parameters.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.12145 by Frank Burkhardt, Lars Thiele, Leszek Raschkowski, Marko Sonkki, Nick Turay, Prasanth Karunakaran, Risto Vuohtoniemi, Stephan Jaeckel, Thomas Heyn, Veikko Hovinen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Propsound channel sounder architecture of the TX and RX during the recording was measured using a laser ranger and a distance wheel. The RX antenna height was always set to approx. 2 m whereas the TX height was varied from 2 m to 8 m to cover different deployment scenarios. For example, two machines might communicate with each other when they are moving around in the factory. In this dual mobility scenario… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Measurement antennas heights were used during the recordings. However, there are differences in the antenna configurations used depending on the frequency. This leads to some restrictions regarding data analysis. The three measurement setups are as follows: Setup 1 - 5.4 GHz, TX-ODA, RX-ODA configuration: This configuration was used when both the TX and the RX were mobile. The TX was equipped with an omni … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Floor plans of the five measurement halls [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Providing reliable low latency wireless links for advanced manufacturing and processing systems is a vision of Industry 4.0. Developing, testing and rating requires accurate models of the radio propagation channel. The current 3GPP-NR model as well as the QuaDRiGa model lack the propagation parameters for the industrial indoor scenario. To close this gap, measurements were conducted at 2.37 GHz and 5.4 GHz at operational Siemens premises in Nuremberg, Germany. Furthermore, the campaign was planned to allow the test and parameterization of new features of the QuaDRiGa channel model such as support for device-to-device (D2D) radio links and spatial consistency. A total of 5.9 km measurement track was used to extract the statistical model parameters for line of sight (LOS) and Non-LOS propagation conditions. It was found that the metallic walls and objects in the halls create a rich scattering environment, where a large number of multipath components arrive at the receiver from all directions. This leads to a robust communication link, provided that the transceivers can handle the interference. The extracted parameters can be used in geometric-stochastic channel models such as QuaDRiGa to support simulation studies, both on link and system level.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper reports results from a 5.9 km measurement campaign at 2.37 GHz and 5.4 GHz conducted inside an operational Siemens industrial facility in Nuremberg. Statistical parameters for LOS/NLOS conditions, delay spreads, angular spreads, and related quantities are extracted for insertion into the 3GPP-NR and QuaDRiGa geometric-stochastic channel models; the environment is characterized as rich scattering due to metallic walls and objects, and the campaign is also used to exercise new QuaDRiGa features such as D2D support and spatial consistency.

Significance. The work supplies previously missing empirical parameters for the industrial indoor scenario that is central to Industry 4.0 link- and system-level simulations. The 5.9 km track length constitutes a substantial real-world data set, and the explicit design for testing spatial consistency and D2D features is a clear strength. If the extracted statistics are accepted as representative, they directly improve the fidelity of QuaDRiGa and 3GPP-NR simulations in comparable metallic industrial halls.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and campaign-planning paragraph: the central claim that the extracted parameters can be used for the industrial indoor scenario in general is not supported by evidence from multiple sites. All data originate from a single Nuremberg facility whose metallic construction produces the reported rich scattering; no cross-site variance, confidence intervals on parameter distributions, or comparison with other industrial halls (different dimensions, clutter density, or materials) is provided.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and environment-description section: no information is supplied on the post-processing pipeline, calibration, or uncertainty quantification applied to the 5.9 km tracks when deriving LOS/NLOS probabilities, delay spreads, or angular spreads. Without these details the reliability of the tabulated parameters cannot be assessed.
minor comments (1)
  1. Figure captions and table headings should explicitly state the center frequencies and the exact definitions (e.g., RMS delay spread, angular spread convention) used for each reported statistic.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We address the two major comments point by point below and indicate where revisions will be made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and campaign-planning paragraph: the central claim that the extracted parameters can be used for the industrial indoor scenario in general is not supported by evidence from multiple sites. All data originate from a single Nuremberg facility whose metallic construction produces the reported rich scattering; no cross-site variance, confidence intervals on parameter distributions, or comparison with other industrial halls (different dimensions, clutter density, or materials) is provided.

    Authors: We agree that all measurements come from a single facility and that this constrains claims of broad applicability. The Siemens site was selected because its metallic construction, large hall dimensions, and clutter density are representative of many Industry 4.0 production environments. The 5.9 km track length yields a statistically substantial dataset for this class of environment. We will revise the abstract, introduction, and conclusions to state that the parameters apply to metallic industrial indoor halls of this type and to explicitly note the single-site limitation; we will also add a short discussion of why cross-site variance could not be quantified within the scope of this campaign. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and environment-description section: no information is supplied on the post-processing pipeline, calibration, or uncertainty quantification applied to the 5.9 km tracks when deriving LOS/NLOS probabilities, delay spreads, or angular spreads. Without these details the reliability of the tabulated parameters cannot be assessed.

    Authors: A description of the measurement hardware, calibration, and basic post-processing appears in Sections III and IV of the manuscript. To improve clarity and address the referee’s concern directly, we will add a dedicated subsection (new Section IV-B) that details the full post-processing pipeline, LOS/NLOS classification criteria, delay-spread and angular-spread estimation methods, and any uncertainty quantification performed on the extracted statistics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely empirical parameter extraction from measurements

full rationale

The paper reports a measurement campaign at one industrial site, extracts statistical parameters (LOS/NLOS probabilities, delay/angular spreads, etc.) directly from the 5.9 km of track data at 2.37/5.4 GHz, and states that these can be inserted into QuaDRiGa/3GPP-NR. No derivation, equation, or model step reduces any reported quantity to a fitted value or self-citation by construction. The central output is the set of measured statistics themselves; the assumption that the single Siemens Nuremberg site is representative is an external validity claim, not a circular reduction. No self-citation load-bearing steps, no fitted-input-called-prediction, and no ansatz smuggling appear in the provided text or abstract.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the measurement campaign and the assumption that extracted statistics transfer to the target channel models; no new entities or free parameters are introduced beyond standard model usage.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard geometric-stochastic channel model assumptions hold for industrial indoor propagation.
    Invoked when stating that the extracted parameters can be used in QuaDRiGa.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5801 in / 1141 out tokens · 46116 ms · 2026-05-25T13:49:06.524513+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

14 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Smart factory of industry 4.0: Key technologies, application case, and challenges,

    B. Chen, J. Wan, L. Shu, P. Li, M. Mukherjee, and B. Yin, “Smart factory of industry 4.0: Key technologies, application case, and challenges,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 6505–6519, 2018

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Industry 4.0: Towards future industrial opportunities and challenges,

    K. Zhou, Taigang Liu, and Lifeng Zhou, “Industry 4.0: Towards future industrial opportunities and challenges,” in 2015 12th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD) , Aug 2015, pp. 2147–2152

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    A survey on device-to-device communication in cellular networks,

    A. Asadi, Q. Wang, and V . Mancuso, “A survey on device-to-device communication in cellular networks,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1801–1819, 2014

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz,

    3GPP TR 38.901 v15.0.0, “Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz,” Tech. Rep., 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Available: http://www.quadriga-channel-model.de

    [Online]. Available: http://www.quadriga-channel-model.de

    work page

  6. [6]

    QuaDRiGa: A 3-D multi-cell channel model with time evolution for enabling virtual field trials,

    S. Jaeckel, L. Raschkowski, K. B ¨orner, and L. Thiele, “QuaDRiGa: A 3-D multi-cell channel model with time evolution for enabling virtual field trials,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. , vol. 62, pp. 3242–3256, 2014

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Directional propagation measurements and modeling in an urban environment at 3.7 GHz,

    L. Raschkowski, S. Jaeckel, F. Undi, L. Thiele, W. Keusgen, B. Pitak- dumrongkija, and M. Ariyoshi, “Directional propagation measurements and modeling in an urban environment at 3.7 GHz,” Proc. ACSSC ’16, pp. 1799–1803, 2016

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    H2020-ICT-671650-mmMAGIC/D2.1: Measurement campaigns and initial channel models for preferred suit- able frequency ranges,

    M. Peter, K. Sakaguchi et al. , “H2020-ICT-671650-mmMAGIC/D2.1: Measurement campaigns and initial channel models for preferred suit- able frequency ranges,” Tech. Rep., 2016

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    Study on evaluation methodology of new vehicle-to-everything v2x use cases for lte and nr,

    3GPP TR 37.885 v15.2.0, “Study on evaluation methodology of new vehicle-to-everything v2x use cases for lte and nr,” Tech. Rep., 2018

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Study on new radio (NR) to support non terrestrial networks,

    3GPP TR 38.811 v15.0.0, “Study on new radio (NR) to support non terrestrial networks,” Tech. Rep., 2018

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Study on enhanced LTE support for aerial vehicles,

    3GPP TR 36.777 v15.0.0, “Study on enhanced LTE support for aerial vehicles,” Tech. Rep., 2017

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Channel parameter estimation in mobile radio environ- ments using the sage algorithm,

    B. Fleury, M. Tschudin, R. Heddergott, D. Dahlhaus, and K. Inge- man Pedersen, “Channel parameter estimation in mobile radio environ- ments using the sage algorithm,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 434–450, 1999

    work page 1999

  13. [13]

    Quasi-deterministic channel modeling and experimental validation in cooperative and massive MIMO deployment topologies,

    S. Jaeckel, “Quasi-deterministic channel modeling and experimental validation in cooperative and massive MIMO deployment topologies,” Ph.D. dissertation, TU Ilmenau, 2017. [Online]. Available: https: //www.db-thueringen.de/receive/dbt mods 00032895

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    Inter-and intrasite correlations of large-scale parameters from macrocellular measurements at 1800 MHz,

    N. Jald ´en, P. Zetterberg, B. Ottersten, and L. Garcia, “Inter-and intrasite correlations of large-scale parameters from macrocellular measurements at 1800 MHz,” EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. Netw., no. 2007:025757, 2007

    work page 2007