pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.00145 · v1 · pith:JYIWUPAOnew · submitted 2019-06-29 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Dynamics of a micro-VCSEL operated in the threshold region under low-level optical feedback

Tao Wang , Xianghu Wang , Zhilei Deng , Jiacheng Sun , Gian Piero Puccioni , Gaofeng Wang , Gian Luca Lippi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 13:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords micro-VCSELoptical feedbackcorrelation functionsnanolasersphoton statisticsthreshold regionstochastic modeling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Correlation functions can characterize optical feedback effects on micro-VCSEL dynamics near threshold and match traditional measurements.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the dynamical properties of a micro-VCSEL operated below the macroscopic lasing threshold under low-level optical feedback. Its two goals are to explore feedback at very low energy consumption and to test whether correlation functions can stand in for direct time traces when studying nanolasers. Time traces, radiofrequency spectra, and correlation functions are recorded experimentally; the latter two sets of data agree on how feedback alters the dynamics. A fully stochastic numerical model reproduces the measured behavior closely, which the authors take as evidence that the same approach can be used at the nanoscale where only photon statistics are accessible.

Core claim

Comparison of time traces, radiofrequency spectra, and correlation functions confirms the ability of correlation functions to satisfactorily characterize the action of feedback on the laser dynamics, with numerical predictions from a previously developed fully stochastic modeling technique providing very close agreement with the experimental observations.

What carries the argument

Correlation functions applied to intensity fluctuations, shown to capture feedback-induced changes equivalently to radiofrequency spectra in the threshold region.

If this is right

  • Feedback studies become feasible in the low-coherence, low-power regime between pulsed emission and the accepted threshold.
  • Correlation functions become a practical substitute for full time-resolved measurements when characterizing laser dynamics under reinjection.
  • The close match between experiment and the stochastic model supports using the same model to predict nanolaser behavior.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If correlation functions prove reliable at the nanoscale, feedback control strategies developed on micro-VCSELs could transfer directly to single-emitter devices.
  • The same surrogate approach might be tested on other laser types operated near threshold to check whether the correlation-function equivalence holds beyond VCSELs.

Load-bearing premise

The micro-VCSEL under feedback serves as a valid surrogate whose measured dynamics can be extended to nanolasers where only photon statistics are possible.

What would settle it

An experiment on an actual nanolaser in which correlation functions extracted from photon statistics disagree with the feedback signatures predicted by the stochastic model calibrated on the micro-VCSEL.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.00145 by Gaofeng Wang, Gian Luca Lippi, Gian Piero Puccioni, Jiacheng Sun, Tao Wang, Xianghu Wang, Zhilei Deng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic illustration of the experimental design: LD, semiconductor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Main panel: log-log laser response with (squares, blue online) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Radiofrequency spectra for (a) ipump = 1.00ith, (b) 1.10ith, and (c)2.00ith. The very narrow lines appearing in all spectra are artefacts due to spurious rf components presents in the environment. The three dashed vertical lines, across the three panels, mark the position of the 4th, 8th, and 12th harmonic component of the external cavity’s roundtrip frequency. the low-frequency spectral enhancement (0 ≤ ν… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: compares the zero-delay (τ = 0) autocorrelation function obtained from data in the absence of feedback [37] (dashed, black line) and in the presence of feedback (solid, red line). Below ith (cf. inset for details) feedback induces strong changes in the autocorrelation as shown not only by its “oscillations” in the mean value but also by the large error bars. This regime (i < ith) corresponds to the feedbac… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Numerical time traces computed for normalized pump values [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Numerical time-delayed second-order autocorrelation for normalized P [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Semiconductor lasers are notoriously sensitive to optical feedback, and their dynamics and coherence can be significantly modified through optical reinjection. We concentrate on the dynamical properties of a very small (i.e., microscale) Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Laser (VCSEL) operated in the low coherence region between the emission of (partially) coherent pulses and ending below the accepted macroscopic lasing threshold, with the double objective of: 1. studying the feedback influence in a regime of very low energy consumption; 2. using the micro-VCSEL as a surrogate for nanolasers, where measurements can only be based on photon statistics. The experimental investigation is based on time traces and radiofrequency spectra (common for macroscale devices) and correlation functions (required at the nanoscale). Comparison of these results confirms the ability of correlation functions to satisfactorily characterize the action of feedback on the laser dynamics. Numerical predictions obtained from a previously developed, fully stochastic modeling technique provide very close agreement with the experimental observations, thus supporting the possible extension of our observations to the nanoscale.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental measurements on a micro-VCSEL operated near threshold under weak optical feedback, employing time traces, RF spectra, and second-order correlation functions. It compares these data to predictions from a previously developed fully stochastic rate-equation model, finds close agreement, and concludes that correlation functions adequately characterize feedback effects while the model agreement supports possible extension of the findings to nanolasers accessible only via photon statistics.

Significance. The experimental validation of the stochastic model against micro-VCSEL data in the low-coherence regime is a useful result and the use of correlation functions as a diagnostic is well-motivated. Credit is due for the direct comparison between experiment and the fully stochastic model. However, the claimed support for nanoscale extrapolation rests on an untested assumption that the same model remains quantitatively predictive when β approaches unity and Purcell effects dominate; without that demonstration the significance for nanolasers is limited.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (and concluding discussion): the assertion that the micro-VCSEL results and model agreement 'support the possible extension of our observations to the nanoscale' is not accompanied by any scaling analysis, parameter study, or additional simulation showing that the stochastic noise terms and rate equations remain accurate when cavity volume shrinks by orders of magnitude, β→1, or Purcell-enhanced spontaneous emission becomes dominant. Agreement at the micro scale therefore does not automatically license the extrapolation that is presented as the second objective of the work.
  2. [Model comparison section (inferred from abstract)] The manuscript provides no quantitative assessment of how sensitive the reported agreement is to the specific values of the model parameters (gain, loss, feedback strength, noise amplitudes) taken from the prior work; without this it is difficult to judge whether the 'very close agreement' is robust or could be reproduced by other parameter choices.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Experimental methods] Additional details on the experimental data processing (e.g., how intensity time traces are converted to g^(2)(τ), binning, normalization, and any statistical uncertainties) would strengthen the claim that correlation functions 'satisfactorily characterize' the feedback action.
  2. [Results] The abstract states 'very close agreement' between experiment and model; a quantitative metric (e.g., RMS deviation or overlap integral) and the precise parameter values used in the stochastic simulations should be reported.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions that will be incorporated.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and concluding discussion): the assertion that the micro-VCSEL results and model agreement 'support the possible extension of our observations to the nanoscale' is not accompanied by any scaling analysis, parameter study, or additional simulation showing that the stochastic noise terms and rate equations remain accurate when cavity volume shrinks by orders of magnitude, β→1, or Purcell-enhanced spontaneous emission becomes dominant. Agreement at the micro scale therefore does not automatically license the extrapolation that is presented as the second objective of the work.

    Authors: The manuscript positions the micro-VCSEL experiment as a surrogate for nanolasers precisely because the same fully stochastic rate-equation model (developed in our prior work) is intended to remain applicable when β approaches unity. The quantitative agreement obtained here with unadjusted parameters therefore provides supporting evidence for that modeling framework. We nevertheless agree that an explicit scaling study or Purcell-factor analysis is absent and would overstate the direct support for nanoscale extrapolation. In the revised manuscript we will modify the abstract and concluding discussion to state that the results 'indicate the potential applicability' of the approach to nanolasers rather than claiming that they 'support the possible extension'. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Model comparison section (inferred from abstract)] The manuscript provides no quantitative assessment of how sensitive the reported agreement is to the specific values of the model parameters (gain, loss, feedback strength, noise amplitudes) taken from the prior work; without this it is difficult to judge whether the 'very close agreement' is robust or could be reproduced by other parameter choices.

    Authors: All model parameters were taken unchanged from the earlier publication and were not adjusted or fitted to the present data set; the comparison therefore constitutes an a-priori test of the model. The fact that the same fixed parameter set reproduces time traces, RF spectra, and second-order correlation functions simultaneously lends support to the robustness of the agreement. A systematic sensitivity study would certainly be valuable but lies outside the scope of this primarily experimental validation. We will add a short clarifying sentence in the revised text stating that the parameters originate from independent prior work and were not tuned to the current measurements. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation to prior stochastic model; core experimental results independent

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental measurements (time traces, RF spectra, correlation functions) on a micro-VCSEL under feedback and compares them to predictions from a 'previously developed, fully stochastic modeling technique.' This reference is a self-citation but is not load-bearing: the experimental characterization stands on its own, the model is external to the present dataset, and no quantity is fitted from the current data then relabeled as a prediction. The cautious statement that agreement 'support[s] the possible extension' to nanoscale does not create a self-definitional or fitted-input reduction. No other patterns (ansatz smuggling, uniqueness theorems, renaming) appear.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; work relies on a previously developed stochastic model whose details are not specified here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5738 in / 1077 out tokens · 21224 ms · 2026-05-25T13:15:46.662459+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Instability of semiconductor lasers due to optical feedback from distant reflectors,

    C. H. Henry and R. Kazarinov, “Instability of semiconductor lasers due to optical feedback from distant reflectors,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. , vol. QE-22, p. 294, 1986

    work page 1986

  2. [2]

    Dynamics and coherence of a multimode semiconductor laser with optical feedback in an intermediate- length external-cavity regime,

    C. Serrat, S. Prins, and R. Vilaseca, “Dynamics and coherence of a multimode semiconductor laser with optical feedback in an intermediate- length external-cavity regime,” Phys. Rev. A , vol. 68, pp. 053804(1-7), 2003

    work page 2003

  3. [3]

    Dynamics of semiconductor lasers with optical feedback,

    J. Ohtsubo, “Dynamics of semiconductor lasers with optical feedback,” Semiconductor Lasers , pp. 113-182, 2017

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Optical Spectra of a Semiconductor Laser with Incoherent Optical Feedback,

    J.S. Cohen, F. Wittgrefe, Maarten D. Hoogerland, and J.P. Woerdman, “Optical Spectra of a Semiconductor Laser with Incoherent Optical Feedback,” IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics , vol. 26, pp. 982-990, 1990. 7

    work page 1990

  5. [5]

    Dynamic Regimes in Semiconductor Lasers Subject to Incoherent Optical Feedback,

    R. Ju and P.S. Spencer, “Dynamic Regimes in Semiconductor Lasers Subject to Incoherent Optical Feedback,” J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 23 (8), 2513-2523, 2005

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    External Optical Feedback Phenomena in Semiconduc- tor Lasers

    K. Petermann, “External Optical Feedback Phenomena in Semiconduc- tor Lasers”, IEEE J. Sel. Topics Quantum Electron, 1 (2), 480-489 (1995)

    work page 1995

  7. [7]

    Nonlinear Dynamics of Vertical-Cavity Surface-Emitting Lasers,

    K. Panajotov, M. Sciamanna, I. Gatare, M. Arteaga, and H. Thienpont, “Nonlinear Dynamics of Vertical-Cavity Surface-Emitting Lasers,” Adv. Opt. Technol., vol. 2011, 1-16, 2011

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Polarization dynamics in vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers with optical feedback: experiment and model,

    M. Giudici, S. Balle, T. Ackemann, S. Barland, and J.R. Tredicce, “Polarization dynamics in vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers with optical feedback: experiment and model,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, vol. 16 (11), 2114-2123, 1999

    work page 1999

  9. [9]

    Optical Feedback in Vertical-Cavity Surface-Emitting Lasers,

    A. Hsu, J.-F.P. Seurin, S.L. Chuang, and K.D. Choquette, “Optical Feedback in Vertical-Cavity Surface-Emitting Lasers,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron., vol. 37 (12), 1643-1649, 2001

    work page 2001

  10. [10]

    Dynamics and Polarization Effects in small-area vertical-cavity surface-emitting Lasers in free-running Mode and with time-delayed Feedback,

    M. Sondermann, H. Bohnet, M. Weinkath, and T. Ackemann, “Dynamics and Polarization Effects in small-area vertical-cavity surface-emitting Lasers in free-running Mode and with time-delayed Feedback,” Proc. SPIE, vol. 4942, 92-102, 2003

    work page 2003

  11. [11]

    Optical feedback induces polarization mode hopping in vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers,

    M. Sciamanna, K Panajotov, H. Thienpont, I. Veretennicoff, P. M ´egret, and M. Blondel, “Optical feedback induces polarization mode hopping in vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers,” Opt. Lett., vol. 28 (17), 1543- 1545, 2003

    work page 2003

  12. [12]

    VCSEL-Based Interconnects for Current and Future Data Centers,

    J.A. Tatum, D.Gazula, L.A. Graham, J.K. Guenter, R.H. Johnson, J. King, Ch. Kocot, G.D. Landry,I. Lyubomirsky, A.N. MacInnes, E.M. Shaw, K. Balemarthy, R. Shubochkin, D. Vaidya, M. Yan, and F. Tang, “VCSEL-Based Interconnects for Current and Future Data Centers,” IEEE J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 33 (4), 727-732, 2015

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    VCSEL- Based Optical Link,

    D.M. Kuchta, A.V . Rylyakov, F.E. Doany, C.L. Schow, J.E. Proesel, Ch.W. Baks, P.Westbergh, J.S. Gustavsson, and A. Larsson, “VCSEL- Based Optical Link,”, IEEE Phot. Technol. Lett., vol 27 (6), 577-580 , 2015

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    Switching between polarized modes of a vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser by isotropic optical feedback,

    P. Besnard, M.L. Char `es, and G. St´ephan, F. Robert, “Switching between polarized modes of a vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser by isotropic optical feedback,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, vol. 16 (7), 1059-1063, 1999

    work page 1999

  15. [15]

    Description and analysis of low-frequency fluctuations in vertical- cavity surface-emitting lasers with isotropic optical feedback by a distant reflector,

    A.V . Naumenko, N.A. Loiko, M. Sondermann, and T. Ackemann, “Description and analysis of low-frequency fluctuations in vertical- cavity surface-emitting lasers with isotropic optical feedback by a distant reflector,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 68, 033805, 2003

    work page 2003

  16. [16]

    Low-frequency fluctua- tions and polarization dynamics in vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers with isotropic feedback,

    M. Sondermann, H. Bohnet, and T. Ackemann, “Low-frequency fluctua- tions and polarization dynamics in vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers with isotropic feedback,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 67, 021802(R), 2003

    work page 2003

  17. [17]

    Optical feedback in Vertical-Cavity Surface-Emitting lasers,

    K. Panajotov, M. Sciamanna, M.A. Arteaga, and H. Thienpont, “Optical feedback in Vertical-Cavity Surface-Emitting lasers,” IEEE J.Sel. Topics Quantum Electron., vol. 19, 1700312, 2012

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    GaInAsP/InP surface emitting injection lasers,

    H. Soda, K.-I. Iga, C. Kitahara, and Y . Suematsu, “GaInAsP/InP surface emitting injection lasers,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 18, 2329-2330, 1979

    work page 1979

  19. [19]

    Surface-Emitting LaserIts Birth and Generation of New Opto- electronics Field,

    K. Iga, “Surface-Emitting LaserIts Birth and Generation of New Opto- electronics Field,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Quantum Electron., V ol. 6 (6), 1201-1215, 2000

    work page 2000

  20. [20]

    Demonstration of coherent emission from high-β photonic crystal nanolasers at room temperature,

    R. Hostein, R. Braive, L. Le Gratiet, A. Talneau, G. Beaudoin, I. Robert-Philip, I. Sagnes, and A. Beveratos, “Demonstration of coherent emission from high-β photonic crystal nanolasers at room temperature,” Opt. Lett., vol. 35 (8), 1154-1156, 2010

    work page 2010

  21. [21]

    Applications of nanolasers,

    R.-M. Ma. and R.F. Oulton, “Applications of nanolasers,” Nature Nan- otechnology, vol. 14, 12-22, 2019

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    Moore’s law in photonics,

    M. Smit, J.J. van der Tol, M. Hill, “Moore’s law in photonics,” Laser & Photonics Reviews, vol. 6 (1), 1-3, 2012

    work page 2012

  23. [23]

    Large data centers interconnect bottlenecks,

    A. Ghiasi, “Large data centers interconnect bottlenecks,” Opt. Express, vol. 23 (3), 2018-2090, 2015

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Santori, D

    C. Santori, D. Fattal, J. Vukovi, G. S. Solomon, and Y . Yamamoto, Indistinguishable photons from a single-photon device, Nature, vol. 419, 594, 2002

    work page 2002

  25. [25]

    S. Ates, S. M. Ulrich, S. Reitzenstein, A. L ¨offler, A. Forchel, and P. Michler, Post-selected indistinguishable photons from the resonance fluorescence of a single quantum dot in a microcavity, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 103, 167402, 2009

    work page 2009

  26. [26]

    Dousse, J

    A. Dousse, J. Suffczy ´nski, A. Beveratos, O. Krebs, A. Lema ˆıtre, I. Sagnes, J. Bloch, P. V oisin, and P. Senellart, Ultrabright source of entangled photon pairs, Nature, vol. 466, 217, 2010

    work page 2010

  27. [27]

    Schlehahn, A

    A. Schlehahn, A. Thoma, P. Munnelly, M. Kamp, S. H ¨ofling, T. Heindel, C. Schneider, and S. Reitzenstein, An electrically driven cavity-enhanced source of indistinguishable photons with 61% overall efficiency, APL Photon., vol. 1, 011301, 2016

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    Observing chaos for quantum-dot microlasers with external feedback,

    F. Albert, C. Hopfmann, S. Reitzenstein, Ch. Schneider, S. H ¨ofling, L. Worschech, M. Kamp, W. Kinzel, A. Forchel, and I. Kanter, “Observing chaos for quantum-dot microlasers with external feedback,” Nature Communications, vol. 2, 336 (1-5), 2011

    work page 2011

  29. [29]

    Nonlinear emission characteristics of quantum dotmicropillar lasers in the presence of polarized optical feedback,

    C. Hopfmann, F. Albert, C. Schneider, S. H ¨ofling, M. Kamp, A. Forchel, I. Kanter, and S. Reitzenstein, “Nonlinear emission characteristics of quantum dotmicropillar lasers in the presence of polarized optical feedback,” New J. Phys. , vol. 15, 025030 (1-17), 2013

    work page 2013

  30. [30]

    Single Photon Delayed Feedback: AWay to Stabilize Intrinsic Quantum Cavity Electrodynamics,

    A. Carmele, J. Kabuss, F. Schulze, S. Reitzenstein, and A. Knorr, “Single Photon Delayed Feedback: AWay to Stabilize Intrinsic Quantum Cavity Electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 110, 013601, 2013

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    On-chip optoelectronic feedback in a micropillar laser-detector assembly,

    P. Munnelly, B. Lingnau, M.M. Karow, T. Heindel, M. Kapp, S. H ¨ofling, K. L ¨udge, Ch. Schneider, and S. Reitzenstein, “On-chip optoelectronic feedback in a micropillar laser-detector assembly,” Optica, vol. 4 (3), 303-306, 2017

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Tailoring the mode-switching dynamics in quantum- dot micropillar lasers via time-delayed optical feedback,

    S. Holzinger, Ch. Redlich, B. Lingnau, M. Schmidt, M. von Helversen, J. Beyer, Ch. Schneider, M. Kamp, S. H ¨ofling, K. L ¨udge, X. Porte, and S. Reitzenstein, “Tailoring the mode-switching dynamics in quantum- dot micropillar lasers via time-delayed optical feedback,” Opt. Express, vol. 26 (17), 22457-22470, 2018

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    Determining the linewidth enhancement factor via optical feedback in quantum dot micropillar lasers,

    S. Holzinger, S. Kreinberg, B.H. Hokr, Ch. Schneider, S. H ¨ofling, W.W. Chow, X. Porte, and S. Reitzenstein, “Determining the linewidth enhancement factor via optical feedback in quantum dot micropillar lasers,” Opt. Express, vol. 26 (24), 31363-31371, 2018

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Quantum-dot micropillar lasers subject to coherent time-delayed optical feedback from a short external cavity,

    S. Holzinger, Ch. Schneider, S. H ¨ofling, X. Porte, and S. Reitzenstein, “Quantum-dot micropillar lasers subject to coherent time-delayed optical feedback from a short external cavity,” Sci. Rep., vol. 9, 631 (1-8), 2019

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    Nonlinear dynamics of Fano lasers with optical feedback,

    T.S. Rasmussen and J. Mørk, “Nonlinear dynamics of Fano lasers with optical feedback,” International Symposium on Physics and Applications of Laser Dynamics, 2018

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Modes, stability, and small-signal response of photonic crystal Fano lasers,

    T.S. Rasmussen, Y . Yu, and J. Mørk, “Modes, stability, and small-signal response of photonic crystal Fano lasers,” Opt. Express, vol. 26 (13), 16365-16376, 2018

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    Dynamical buildup of lasing in mesoscale devices,

    T. Wang, G. P. Puccioni and G. L. Lippi, “Dynamical buildup of lasing in mesoscale devices,” Sci. Rep. , vol. 5, 15858, 2015

    work page 2015

  38. [38]

    Exploration of VCSEL Ultra-low Biasing Scheme for Pulse Generation,

    T. Wang, G. Wang, G.P. Puccioni, and G.L. Lippi, “Exploration of VCSEL Ultra-low Biasing Scheme for Pulse Generation,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B vol. 36 (3), 799-804, 2018

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    Nonlinear dynamics at the meso- and nanoscale: stochasticity meets determinism,

    T. Wang, G.P. Puccioni, and G.L. Lippi, “Nonlinear dynamics at the meso- and nanoscale: stochasticity meets determinism,”, in 2018 IEEE Workshop on Complexity in Engineering (COMPENG), pp. 1-5. IEEE, 2018

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Stochastic simulator for modelling the transition to lasing,

    G. P. Puccioni, and G. L. Lippi, “Stochastic simulator for modelling the transition to lasing,” Optics Express, vol. 23, 2369-2374, 2015

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    Threshold dynamics in meso- and nanoscale lasers: why Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Lasers?,

    T. Wang, G.P. Puccioni, G.L. Lippi, “Threshold dynamics in meso- and nanoscale lasers: why Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Lasers?,” Proc. SPIE, vol. 10682, Semiconductor Lasers and Laser Dynamics VIII, 106820Q (1-14), 2018. Freely available for personal use at: https://sites.google.com/site/gianlucalippi

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    Manufacturer’sspecifications:https://www.thorlabs.de/drawings/ d6e6bf60a1b18408-F0BC92E1-BA82-C641-BB9776F0E1974E15/ VCSEL-980-MFGSpec.pdf/

    work page

  43. [43]

    Influence of external optical feedback on threshold and spectral char- acteristics of vertical cavity surface emitting lasers,

    S.J. Jiang, Z.Q. Pan, M. Dagenais, R. A. Morgan, and K. Kojima, “Influence of external optical feedback on threshold and spectral char- acteristics of vertical cavity surface emitting lasers,” IEEE photonics technology letters, vol. 6, 34-36, 1994

    work page 1994

  44. [44]

    Dynamics at threshold in mesoscale lasers,

    T. Wang, H. Vergnet, G.P. Puccioni, and G.L. Lippi, “Dynamics at threshold in mesoscale lasers,” Phys. Rev. A, vol. 96, 013803, 2017

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    Onset of Lasing in Small Devices: The identification of the first threshold through autocorrelation resonance,

    T. Wang, G. P. Puccioni, and G. L. Lippi, “Onset of Lasing in Small Devices: The identification of the first threshold through autocorrelation resonance,” Ann. Phys. , vol. 530, 1800086(1-7), 2018

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    How mesoscale lasers can answer fundamental questions related to nanolasers,

    T. Wang, G.P. Puccioni, and G.L. Lippi, “How mesoscale lasers can answer fundamental questions related to nanolasers,” Proc. SPIE, vol. 9884, Nanophotonics VI, 98840B (1-20), 2016. Freely available for personal use at: https://sites.google.com/site/gianlucalippi

    work page 2016

  47. [47]

    Correlation properties and drift phenomena in the dynamics of vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers with optical feedback,

    M. Sondermann and T. Ackemann, “Correlation properties and drift phenomena in the dynamics of vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers with optical feedback,” Opt. Express, vol. 13 (7), 2707-2715, 2005

    work page 2005

  48. [48]

    Nontrivial photon statistics in small scale lasers,

    T. Wang, D. Aktas, O. Alibart, ´E. Picholle, G.P. Puccioni, S. Tanzilli, and G.L. Lippi, “Nontrivial photon statistics in small scale lasers,”, arXiv:1710.02052, 2017

    work page arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    Low-frequency fluctuations in vertical cavity lasers: Experiments versus Lang- Kobayashi dynamics,

    A. Torcini, S. Barland, G. Giacomelli, and F. Marin, “Low-frequency fluctuations in vertical cavity lasers: Experiments versus Lang- Kobayashi dynamics,” Phys. Rev. A vol. 74, 063801, 2006

    work page 2006

  50. [50]

    External feedback effects on semiconductor laser properties,

    R. Lang and K. Kobayashi, “External feedback effects on semiconductor laser properties,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. , vol. QE-16, p. 347, 1980. 8

    work page 1980

  51. [51]

    Numerical solutions to the Laser Rate Equations with noise: technical issues, imple- mentation and pitfalls,

    G.L. Lippi, J. Mørk, and G.P. Puccioni, “Numerical solutions to the Laser Rate Equations with noise: technical issues, imple- mentation and pitfalls,” Proc. SPIE, vol. 10672, Nanophotonics VII, 106722B (1-14), 2018. Freely available for personal use at: https://sites.google.com/site/gianlucalippi

    work page 2018

  52. [52]

    Analytical vs. Numerical Langevin Description of Noise in Small Lasers

    G.L. Lippi, J. Mørk, and G.P. Puccioni, “Analytical vs. Numerical Langevin Description of Noise in Small Lasers”, arXiv:1903.08859, 2019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903

  53. [53]

    Determinis- tic chaos in laser with injected signal,

    F.T. Arecchi, G.L. Lippi, G.P. Puccioni, and J.R. Tredicce, “Determinis- tic chaos in laser with injected signal,” Opt. Commun., vol. 51, 308-314, 1985

    work page 1985

  54. [54]

    Instabilities in lasers with an injected signal,

    J.R. Tredicce, F.T. Arecchi, G.L. Lippi, and G.P. Puccioni, “Instabilities in lasers with an injected signal,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, vol. 2, 173-183, 1985

    work page 1985

  55. [55]

    Zur Quantentheorie der Strahlung,

    A. Einstein,“Zur Quantentheorie der Strahlung,” Physikalische Zeitschr., vol. 18, 121-128, 1917. Tao Wang received his Ph.D. degree in physics from the Universit ´e de Nice- Sophia Antipolis, France, in 2016. From 2013 to 2016, he worked in the Institut Non Lin ´eaire de Nice (now the Institut de Physique de Nice) as a PhD student. Since 2016, he was an p...

    work page 1917