pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.02378 · v1 · pith:UV6RGSCPnew · submitted 2019-07-04 · 🧮 math.AG

The Bruce-Roberts number of a function on a hypersurface with isolated singularity

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 09:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AG
keywords bruce-roberts numbermilnor numbertjurina numberhypersurface singularitylogarithmic characteristic varietycohen-macaulay
0
0 comments X

The pith

For functions on isolated hypersurface singularities with finite Bruce-Roberts number, that number equals the sum of three Milnor numbers minus the Tjurina number.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proves an explicit algebraic formula relating the Bruce-Roberts number of a function f on a hypersurface X to the Milnor numbers of f, of the pair (φ,f), and of X itself, minus the Tjurina number of X. It further establishes that the logarithmic characteristic variety of X is Cohen-Macaulay. These identities hold whenever the Bruce-Roberts number is finite and remove the weighted-homogeneity restriction present in earlier statements of the same results.

Core claim

If (X,0) is an isolated hypersurface singularity defined by φ and f has finite Bruce-Roberts number μ_BR(f,X), then μ_BR(f,X) equals μ(f) + μ(φ,f) + μ(X,0) − τ(X,0). In addition, the logarithmic characteristic variety LC(X,0) is Cohen-Macaulay.

What carries the argument

The Bruce-Roberts number μ_BR(f,X), which counts the dimension of a certain quotient module attached to the pair (f,X) and serves as the central invariant whose value is expressed in terms of Milnor and Tjurina numbers.

Load-bearing premise

The Bruce-Roberts number of f on X is finite and X is an isolated hypersurface singularity.

What would settle it

An explicit pair (f,X) with finite μ_BR(f,X) for which the numerical equality μ_BR(f,X) = μ(f) + μ(φ,f) + μ(X,0) − τ(X,0) fails to hold.

read the original abstract

Let $(X,0)$ be an isolated hypersurface singularity defined by $\phi\colon(\mathbb C^n,0)\to(\mathbb C,0)$ and $f\colon(\mathbb C^n,0)\to\mathbb C$ such that the Bruce-Roberts number $\mu_{BR}(f,X)$ is finite. We first prove that $\mu_{BR}(f,X)=\mu(f)+\mu(\phi,f)+\mu(X,0)-\tau(X,0)$, where $\mu$ and $\tau$ are the Milnor and Tjurina numbers respectively of a function or an isolated complete intersection singularity. Second, we show that the logarithmic characteristic variety $LC(X,0)$ is Cohen-Macaulay. Both theorems generalize the results of a previous paper by some of the authors, in which the hypersurface $(X,0)$ was assumed to be weighted homogeneous.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proves two results for an isolated hypersurface singularity (X,0) defined by φ : (C^n,0) → (C,0) and a function f with finite Bruce-Roberts number μ_BR(f,X): the equality μ_BR(f,X) = μ(f) + μ(φ,f) + μ(X,0) − τ(X,0), where μ and τ denote the indicated Milnor and Tjurina numbers, and the assertion that the logarithmic characteristic variety LC(X,0) is Cohen-Macaulay. Both statements remove the weighted-homogeneous hypothesis required in earlier work by the authors.

Significance. If correct, the explicit formula supplies a practical relation among standard singularity invariants that accounts for the difference μ(X,0) − τ(X,0) in the non-weighted-homogeneous setting, while the Cohen-Macaulay property of LC(X,0) supplies a structural fact useful for further computations in the theory of logarithmic derivations and characteristic varieties.

minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract states that μ and τ apply to “a function or an isolated complete intersection singularity,” but does not specify the precise definition of the mixed term μ(φ,f); a brief parenthetical or reference in the abstract would clarify the notation for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation to accept the manuscript. No major comments were raised.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation self-contained via independent invariants

full rationale

The central result expresses μ_BR(f,X) explicitly as μ(f) + μ(φ,f) + μ(X,0) − τ(X,0) using the standard, independently defined Milnor and Tjurina numbers; these are not defined in terms of μ_BR nor fitted from it. The Cohen-Macaulay claim on LC(X,0) is likewise a direct structural statement. The generalization from the authors' prior weighted-homogeneous case is achieved precisely by inserting the difference μ(X,0)−τ(X,0), which is an external correction term rather than a self-referential loop. No equation reduces to its own inputs by construction, no parameter is renamed as a prediction, and the cited prior work supplies only the special-case baseline, not the load-bearing argument for the general case.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Relies on the standard definitions and basic properties of Milnor and Tjurina numbers for isolated singularities in complex analytic geometry; no free parameters or new entities introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Milnor and Tjurina numbers are well-defined for isolated hypersurface and complete-intersection singularities
    Invoked directly in the stated equality

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5716 in / 1160 out tokens · 26578 ms · 2026-05-25T09:09:36.409891+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Ahmed, M

    I. Ahmed, M. A. S. Ruas, J. N. Tomazella, Invariants of topological relative right equivalences , Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society ( Print), v. 155, p. 1-9, 2013

  2. [2]

    Mixed Bruce-Roberts numbers

    C. Bivi` a-Ausina and M. A. S. Ruas, Mixed Bruce-Roberts number, arXiv:1810.10570 (2018)

  3. [3]

    Brieskorn and G

    E. Brieskorn and G. M. Greuel, Singularities of complete intersections , Manifolds-Tokyo 1973 (Proc. Internat. Conf., Tokyo, 1973), Univ. Tokyo Press, (1975), 123 –129

  4. [4]

    J. W. Bruce and R. M. Roberts, Critical points of functions on analytic varieties , Topology 27 (1988), No. 1, 57–90

  5. [5]

    Decker, G

    W. Decker, G. M. Greuel, G. Pfister; Sch¨ onemann, H.: Singular 4-1-1 - A computer algebra system for polynomial computations. http://www.singular.uni-kl.de (2018)

  6. [6]

    J. A. Eagon and M. Hochster, Cohen–Macaulay rings, invariant theory, and the generic pe rfection of determinantal loci , Amer. J. Math. 93 (1971), 1020–1058

  7. [7]

    Gaffney, Multiplicities an Equisingularity of ICIS germs , Invent

    T. Gaffney, Multiplicities an Equisingularity of ICIS germs , Invent. Math. 123 (1996), No. 2,209-220

  8. [8]

    G. M. Greuel, Constant Milnor number implies constant multiplicity for q uasihomogeneous singular- ities, Manuscripta Math. 56 (1986), No. 2, 159-166

  9. [9]

    N. G. Grulha J´ unior, Erratum: The Euler obstruction and Bruce-Roberts’ Milnor n umber Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, v. 63, 257–258, 2012

  10. [10]

    N. G. Grulha J´ unior, The Euler Obstruction and Bruce–Roberts’ Milnor Number , Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, v. 60, 291–302, 2009

  11. [11]

    Hamm, Lokale topologische Eigenschaften komplexer R¨ aume, (German) Math

    H. Hamm, Lokale topologische Eigenschaften komplexer R¨ aume, (German) Math. Ann. 191 (1971) 235-252

  12. [12]

    Hamm, Topology of isolated singularities of complex spaces , Proceedings of Liverpool Singularities Symposium, II (1969/1970), 213-217

    H. Hamm, Topology of isolated singularities of complex spaces , Proceedings of Liverpool Singularities Symposium, II (1969/1970), 213-217. Lectures Noted in Math., V ol.209, Springer, Berlin 1971

  13. [13]

    T. W. Hungerford; Algebra, volume 73 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Ne w York, 1980. Reprint of the 1974 original

  14. [14]

    V. H. Jorge P´ erez, M. J. Saia, Euler Obstruction, Polar multiplicities and Equisingular ity of Map Germs in O(n,p), n < p , Internat. J. Math. 17 (2006), No. 8, 887-903

  15. [15]

    The Milnor-Palamodov Theorem for Functions on Isolated Hypersurface Singularities

    K. Kourliouros, The Milnor-Palamodov Theorem for Functions on Isolated Hyp ersurface Singulari- ties, arXiv:1811.07422 (2018)

  16. [16]

    E. J. N. Looijenga, Isolated singular points on complete intersections , London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 77. Cambridge University Press (1984). THE BRUCE-ROBERTS NUMBER OF A FUNCTION ON A HYPERSURF ACE 13

  17. [17]

    R. D. MacPherson, Chern classes for singular algebraic varieties , Ann. of Math. 100 (1974), 423?432

  18. [18]

    Milnor, Singular Points of Complex Hypersurfaces , Annals of Mathematical Studies 61, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1968

    J. Milnor, Singular Points of Complex Hypersurfaces , Annals of Mathematical Studies 61, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1968

  19. [19]

    J. J. Nu˜ no-Ballesteros, B. Or´ efice-Okamoto, J. N. Tomazella, The Vanishing Euler Characteristic of an Isolated Determinantal Singularity , Israel Journal of Mathematics, v. 224, p. 505-512, 2018

  20. [20]

    J. J. Nu˜ no Ballesteros, B. Or´ efice-Okamoto, J. N. Tomazella, The Bruce-Roberts number of a function on a weighted homogeneous hypersurface, Q. J. Math.64(2013), no. 1, 269-280

  21. [21]

    Or´ efice-Okamoto,O N´ umero de Milnor de uma Singularidade Isolada , Thesis, S˜ ao Carlos, 2010

    B. Or´ efice-Okamoto,O N´ umero de Milnor de uma Singularidade Isolada , Thesis, S˜ ao Carlos, 2010

  22. [22]

    G. R. Pellikaanh, Hypersurface Singularities and Resolutions of Jacobi Modu les, Thesis, Utrecht, 1985

  23. [23]

    Saito, Theory of logarithmic differential forms and logarithmic ve ctor fields , J

    K. Saito, Theory of logarithmic differential forms and logarithmic ve ctor fields , J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. 1A Math. 27 (1980), 265–291

  24. [24]

    Seade, M

    J. Seade, M. Tibar and A. Verjovsky, Milnor numbers and Euler obstruction , Bull. Braz. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 36 (2005), 275–283

  25. [25]

    Tajima, On Polar Varieties, Logarithmic Vector Fields and Holonomi c D-modules , RIMS Kˆ okyˆ uroku Bessatsu, 2013

    S. Tajima, On Polar Varieties, Logarithmic Vector Fields and Holonomi c D-modules , RIMS Kˆ okyˆ uroku Bessatsu, 2013

  26. [26]

    J. M. Wahl, Derivations, Automorphisms and Deformations on Quasi-Hom ogeneous Singularity, in Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 40 A.M.S. Providence, 1983. Departament de Matem `atiques, Universitat de V al ` encia, Campus de Burjassot, 46100 Burjassot SPAIN E-mail address : Juan.Nuno@uv.es Departamento de Matem´atica, Universidade Federal de S ˜ao Carlos, Caixa Pos...