pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.04858 · v2 · pith:42BDCZGVnew · submitted 2019-07-10 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Impact of Galaxy Mergers on the Colours of Cluster Galaxies

Sree Oh , Keunho Kim , Joon Hyeop Lee , Minjin Kim , Yun-Kyeong Sheen , Jinsu Rhee , Chang H. Ree , Hyunjin Jeong
show 4 more authors
Luis C. Ho Jaemann Kyeong Byeong-Gon Park Sukyoung K. Yi
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 23:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxy mergerscluster galaxiesgalaxy colorsenvironmental quenchingmorphological disturbancestar formationgalaxy evolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

Galaxy mergers help cluster galaxies retain bluer colors longer by sustaining star formation or protecting gas against environmental effects.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper splits a sample of cluster galaxies into those with visual signs of recent mergers and those without. Disturbed galaxies appear bluer in both ultraviolet and optical bands. The color difference persists even when galaxies are compared at the same cluster location and with the same overall shape. The authors conclude that mergers allow galaxies to resist the reddening influence of the cluster environment for longer, either by triggering new stars or by moving gas to the center where it is harder to strip away.

Core claim

Galaxies showing visual signatures of recent mergers have significantly bluer colors than undisturbed galaxies. This holds in both the cluster core and outskirts, and remains after fixing galaxy morphology. The authors interpret the result as evidence that mergers prolong blue colors under environmental quenching through merger-induced star formation or central gas concentration less vulnerable to stripping.

What carries the argument

Visual classification of galaxies into morphologically disturbed (recent merger signatures) versus undisturbed categories, followed by color comparison while controlling for cluster position and morphology.

If this is right

  • Disturbed galaxies are found more often on cluster outskirts, consistent with recent infall.
  • Blue disturbed galaxies display features linked to recent star formation.
  • The color difference appears independent of galaxy morphology.
  • Mergers appear to counteract the reddening normally produced by cluster gas stripping.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Spectroscopic or HI maps of gas content in the same galaxies could test whether central concentration is the operative mechanism.
  • Models of color evolution in clusters could incorporate a temporary delay in quenching tied to merger timing.
  • Repeating the split in lower-mass groups versus rich clusters would show whether the effect scales with environment density.

Load-bearing premise

Visual inspection can isolate the effects of recent mergers without being mixed up by dust, viewing angle, or earlier differences in star formation.

What would settle it

A re-analysis that uses quantitative asymmetry or tidal-feature metrics instead of visual classification and finds no remaining color difference between the two groups after matching on star-formation history.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.04858 by Byeong-Gon Park, Chang H. Ree, Hyunjin Jeong, Jaemann Kyeong, Jinsu Rhee, Joon Hyeop Lee, Keunho Kim, Luis C. Ho, Minjin Kim, Sree Oh, Sukyoung K. Yi, Yun-Kyeong Sheen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The NUV exposure time and magnitude for 1027 galax￾ies with NUV detections. Black-filled circles are 906 sample galax￾ies, and red-open circles show the 121 galaxies excluded from the sample after considering aperture sizes and magnitude errors in the NUV band. The impact of the conservative sampling (dashed line; NUV < 23.5 and texp > 1500 seconds) on the main result is not significant (Appendix) [PITH_F… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The distributions of the absolute r 0 magnitude (top) and mass (bottom) for 906 sample galaxies. Disturbed and undis￾turbed groups show similar distributions in magnitude and mass. into free S´ersic (bulge) and exponential (disk) components based on r 0 -band images using galfit software (Peng et al. 2002, 2010). For more information on the visual classifica￾tions and parameters used in this study, refer t… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The composite g 0 −r 0 CMD for each morphology. Solid and dashed lines indicate the RS and the sequence 2σ below the RS based on elliptical galaxies (E), respectively. Morphologically￾disturbed galaxies which are denoted by diamonds show bluer colour compared to undisturbed galaxies in the same morphology. 4 THE UV-OPTICAL COLOUR-MAGNITUDE RELATION As expected from the optical CMD, morphologically￾disturbe… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The g 0 − r 0 colour distribution corrected for the NUV completeness. Dashed lines indicate median value of colour, sug￾gesting bluer colour distribution of disturbed galaxies (red) com￾pared to undisturbed ones (black). Error bars represent standard error of the median. The median p-value from the thousand iter￾ations of the KS test considering g 0 − r 0 errors is shown in each panel. reported in Sheen et… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The composite NUV−r 0 CMD for each B/T subgroup. Details are same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The phase-space diagram. The grids separating five regions (A-E) are adopted from Rhee et al. (2017), but modified to be the one based on R/R200. Both disturbed (red diamonds) and undisturbed (black circles) galaxies are spread over the regions. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The NUV−r 0 colour distribution corrected for the NUV completeness. Dashed lines indicate median value of colour, suggesting bluer colour distribution of disturbed (red) galaxies compared undisturbed ones (black). Error bars represent stan￾dard error of the median. The median p-value from the thousand iterations of the KS test considering NUV−r 0 errors is shown in each panel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The NUV−r 0 colour distributions of disturbed (red) and undisturbed (black) galaxies corrected for the NUV completeness. Regions A-E are adopted from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Features of disturbed galaxies in each morphology, NUV−r 0 colour, and phase-space region. The top and bottom row of each region show the r 0 -band and (u)gr colour composite images. We found differences in features according to NUV−r 0 colours and phase-space regions. us to classify galaxy morphology while considering various contrasts, residuals, and colours. First, we found a difference in features acc… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Even if star formation has not been activated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We examine the ultraviolet and optical colours of 906 cluster galaxies from the KASI-Yonsei Deep Imaging Survey of Clusters (KYDISC). Galaxies have been divided into two categories, morphologically-disturbed and undisturbed galaxies, based on the visual signatures related to recent mergers. We find that galaxies with signatures of recent mergers show significantly bluer colours than undisturbed galaxies. Disturbed galaxies populate more on the cluster outskirts, suggesting recent accretion into the cluster environment, which implies that disturbed galaxies can be less influenced by the environmental quenching process and remain blue. However, we still detect bluer colours of disturbed galaxies in all locations (cluster core and outskirts) for the fixed morphology, which is difficult to understand just considering the difference in time since infall into a cluster. Moreover, blue disturbed galaxies show features seemingly related to recent star formation. Therefore, we suspect that mergers make disturbed galaxies keep their blue colour longer than undisturbed galaxies under the effect of the environmental quenching through either merger-induced star formation or central gas concentration which is less vulnerable for gas stripping.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes UV and optical colors of 906 cluster galaxies from the KYDISC survey. Galaxies are visually classified as morphologically-disturbed (showing merger signatures) or undisturbed. Disturbed galaxies are found to be significantly bluer than undisturbed ones, even after controlling for location (core vs. outskirts) and morphology; the authors interpret this as evidence that mergers help maintain blue colors against environmental quenching via induced star formation or central gas concentration.

Significance. If the visual classification cleanly isolates recent mergers without confounding by dust, projection, or pre-existing star formation, the result would indicate a mechanism by which mergers modulate quenching timescales in clusters, with implications for semi-analytic models of environmental effects. The sample size of 906 galaxies provides a reasonable basis for such a comparison, but the absence of reported error bars or bias tests limits immediate impact.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / sample division paragraph] Abstract and sample-division paragraph: the claim of a 'statistically significant' color difference after location and morphology controls provides no error bars, subsample sizes, or explicit statistical test (e.g., Kolmogorov-Smirnov or bootstrap), so the significance cannot be evaluated from the presented information.
  2. [Sample division paragraph] Sample-division paragraph: the visual classification into disturbed vs. undisturbed galaxies is presented without any quantification of potential selection biases (e.g., correlation with dust lanes, inclination, or pre-infall star-formation rate), which directly affects whether the residual color offset can be attributed to merger-induced effects rather than classification confounders.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: the interpretation that 'mergers make disturbed galaxies keep their blue colour longer' rests on the assumption that the color difference is independent of time since infall, yet no quantitative comparison of infall-time proxies (beyond location) or alternative quenching-delay mechanisms is shown.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from explicit mention of the number of galaxies in each morphological and location bin to allow immediate assessment of the controls.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments identify areas where additional statistical detail, discussion of classification limitations, and clarification of the interpretation will strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / sample division paragraph] Abstract and sample-division paragraph: the claim of a 'statistically significant' color difference after location and morphology controls provides no error bars, subsample sizes, or explicit statistical test (e.g., Kolmogorov-Smirnov or bootstrap), so the significance cannot be evaluated from the presented information.

    Authors: We agree that the current version does not report error bars on the color measurements, explicit subsample sizes for the controlled comparisons, or the details of the statistical test underlying the significance claim. In the revised manuscript we will add these elements: error bars on all color distributions, a table of subsample sizes, and the results of a two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (with bootstrap resampling for robustness) performed on the color distributions after the location and morphology controls. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Sample division paragraph] Sample-division paragraph: the visual classification into disturbed vs. undisturbed galaxies is presented without any quantification of potential selection biases (e.g., correlation with dust lanes, inclination, or pre-infall star-formation rate), which directly affects whether the residual color offset can be attributed to merger-induced effects rather than classification confounders.

    Authors: The manuscript does not contain a quantitative assessment of possible classification biases. We will revise the methods and discussion sections to address this explicitly: we will report the fraction of galaxies with visible dust lanes in each class, note that classification was performed independently of color information, and discuss the limited leverage the current imaging provides for inclination or pre-infall SFR biases. Where quantitative tests are feasible with the existing data we will add them; where they are not, we will state the limitation clearly. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the interpretation that 'mergers make disturbed galaxies keep their blue colour longer' rests on the assumption that the color difference is independent of time since infall, yet no quantitative comparison of infall-time proxies (beyond location) or alternative quenching-delay mechanisms is shown.

    Authors: We use projected cluster-centric radius as the primary observational proxy for time since infall and demonstrate that the color offset persists at fixed radius and morphology. This is the quantitative comparison available with the present data set. We acknowledge that more refined proxies (e.g., phase-space location or stellar-population ages) are not employed. In the revision we will (i) state the limitation of the radius proxy explicitly and (ii) note that the persistence of the offset inside fixed radial bins already argues against a pure infall-time explanation, while leaving open the possibility of additional mechanisms. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational subsample comparison

full rationale

The paper divides galaxies by visual inspection into morphologically-disturbed vs. undisturbed categories and reports an empirical color difference between those subsamples (both overall and at fixed location/morphology). No equations, fitted parameters, model predictions, or self-citations are used to derive the central claim; the result is a direct data comparison whose validity rests on the classification step itself rather than any reduction to prior outputs. This matches the default non-circular case for observational astronomy papers.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the reliability of visual merger signatures as a proxy for recent mergers and on the assumption that controlling for location and morphology removes all other confounders; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Visual signatures reliably indicate recent galaxy mergers without significant contamination from projection effects or other processes
    The entire disturbed/undisturbed split and subsequent color comparison depends on this classification step described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5761 in / 1202 out tokens · 17860 ms · 2026-05-24T23:31:53.084755+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    K., Glazebrook, K., Brinkmann, J., et al

    Baldry, I. K., Glazebrook, K., Brinkmann, J., et al. 2004, ApJ, 600, 681

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    P., Franx, M., Postman, M., et al

    Blakeslee, J. P., Franx, M., Postman, M., et al. 2003, ApJL, 596, L143

    work page 2003

  3. [3]

    V., Melchior, A.-L., & Zolotukhin, I

    Chilingarian, I. V., Melchior, A.-L., & Zolotukhin, I. Y. 2010, MNRAS, 405, 1409

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Choi, H., & Yi, S. K. 2017, ApJ, 837, 68

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    J., Jonsson, P., Somerville, R

    Cox, T. J., Jonsson, P., Somerville, R. S., Primack, J. R., & Dekel, A. 2008, MNRAS, 384, 386 Di Matteo, P., Bournaud, F., Martig, M., et al. 2008, A&A, 492, 31

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    E., & Mirabel, I

    Duc, P.-A., Brinks, E., Wink, J. E., & Mirabel, I. F. 1997, A&A, 326, 537

    work page 1997

  7. [7]

    2017, A&A, 598, A45

    George, K. 2017, A&A, 598, A45

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    2015, A&A, 583, A103

    George, K., & Zingade, K. 2015, A&A, 583, A103

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    E., & Gott, J

    Gunn, J. E., & Gott, J. R., III 1972, ApJ, 176, 1

    work page 1972

  10. [10]

    P., Pereira, M

    Haines, C. P., Pereira, M. J., Smith, G. P., et al. 2015, ApJ, 806, 101

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    H., S´ anchez, S

    Haines, T., McIntosh, D. H., S´ anchez, S. F., Tremonti, C., & Rudnick, G. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 433

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    K., Krajnovi´ c, D., & Davies, R

    Jeong, H., Bureau, M., Yi, S. K., Krajnovi´ c, D., & Davies, R. L. 2007, MNRAS, 376, 1021

    work page 2007

  13. [13]

    K., Bureau, M., et al

    Jeong, H., Yi, S. K., Bureau, M., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 398, 2028

    work page 2009

  14. [14]

    2005, ApJL, 619, L135

    Juneau, S., Glazebrook, K., Crampton, D., et al. 2005, ApJL, 619, L135

    work page 2005

  15. [15]

    L., Choi, H., Wong, O

    Jung, S. L., Choi, H., Wong, O. I., et al. 2018, ApJ, 865, 156 Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., White, S. D. M., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 54

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    2014, MNRAS, 440, 2944

    Kaviraj, S. 2014, MNRAS, 440, 2944

    work page 2014

  17. [17]

    2014, MNRAS, 437, L41

    Kaviraj, S. 2014, MNRAS, 437, L41

    work page 2014

  18. [18]

    Kaviraj, S., Schawinski, K., Devriendt, J. E. G., et al. 2007, ApJS, 173, 619 L´ opez-Cruz, O., Barkhouse, W. A., & Yee, H. K. C. 2004, ApJ, 614, 679

    work page 2007

  19. [19]

    Lawrence, A., Rowan-Robinson, M., Leech, K., Jones, D. H. P., & Wall, J. V. 1989, MNRAS, 240, 329

    work page 1989

  20. [20]

    H., Lee, M

    Lee, J. H., Lee, M. G., & Hwang, H. S. 2006, ApJ, 650, 148

    work page 2006

  21. [21]

    C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al

    Martin, D. C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al. 2005, ApJL, 619, L1

    work page 2005

  22. [22]

    Martin, G., Kaviraj, S., Devriendt, J. E. G., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 2266

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    H., Wagner, C., Cooper, A., et al

    McIntosh, D. H., Wagner, C., Cooper, A., et al. 2014, MN- RAS, 442, 533

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    P., Blakeslee, J

    Mei, S., Holden, B. P., Blakeslee, J. P., et al. 2009, ApJ, 690, 42

    work page 2009

  25. [25]

    P., Blakeslee, J

    Mei, S., Holden, B. P., Blakeslee, J. P., et al. 2006, ApJ, c⃝ 2018 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–?? Impact of Galaxy Mergers on the Colours of Cluster Galaxies 13 644, 759

    work page 2006

  26. [26]

    H., et al

    Oh, S., Kim, K., Lee, J. H., et al. 2018, ApJS, 237, 14

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    Y., Ho, L

    Peng, C. Y., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D., & Rix, H.-W. 2010, AJ, 139, 2097

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    Y., Ho, L

    Peng, C. Y., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D., & Rix, H.-W. 2002, AJ, 124, 266

    work page 2002

  29. [29]

    2006, ARA&A, 44, 141

    Renzini, A. 2006, ARA&A, 44, 141

    work page 2006

  30. [30]

    2017, ApJ, 843, 128

    Rhee, J., Smith, R., Choi, H., et al. 2017, ApJ, 843, 128

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    2009, ApJ, 700, 161

    Salim, S., Dickinson, M., Michael Rich, R., et al. 2009, ApJ, 700, 161

    work page 2009

  32. [32]

    B., Soifer, B

    Sanders, D. B., Soifer, B. T., Elias, J. H., et al. 1988, ApJ, 325, 74

    work page 1988

  33. [33]

    2007, ApJS, 173, 512

    Schawinski, K., Kaviraj, S., Khochfar, S., et al. 2007, ApJS, 173, 512

    work page 2007

  34. [34]

    2009, MN- RAS, 396, 818 Schlafly, E

    Schawinski, K., Lintott, C., Thomas, D., et al. 2009, MN- RAS, 396, 818 Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103

    work page 2009

  35. [35]

    K., Ree, C

    Sheen, Y.-K., Yi, S. K., Ree, C. H., et al. 2016, ApJ, 827, 32

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    K., Ree, C

    Sheen, Y.-K., Yi, S. K., Ree, C. H., & Lee, J. 2012, ApJS, 202, 8

    work page 2012

  37. [37]

    2016, ApJ, 833, 109

    Smith, R., Choi, H., Lee, J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 109

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    2013, MNRAS, 429, 1066

    Smith, R., S´ anchez-Janssen, R., Fellhauer, M., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 1066

    work page 2013

  39. [39]

    G., Ashby, M

    Wang, Z., Fazio, G. G., Ashby, M. L. N., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 193

    work page 2004

  40. [40]

    K., Martin, D

    Wyder, T. K., Martin, D. C., Schiminovich, D., et al. 2007, ApJS, 173, 293

    work page 2007

  41. [41]

    K., Lee, J., Jung, I., Ji, I., & Sheen, Y.-K

    Yi, S. K., Lee, J., Jung, I., Ji, I., & Sheen, Y.-K. 2013, A&A, 554, A122

    work page 2013

  42. [42]

    K., Yoon, S.-J., Kaviraj, S., et al

    Yi, S. K., Yoon, S.-J., Kaviraj, S., et al. 2005, ApJL, 619, L111

    work page 2005

  43. [43]

    Z., Bell, E

    Zheng, X. Z., Bell, E. F., Papovich, C., et al. 2007, ApJL, 661, L41 c⃝ 2018 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–??

    work page 2007