pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.05915 · v1 · pith:IIGBX5D7new · submitted 2019-07-12 · 🧮 math.PR

Functional treatment of asymmetric copulas

Ahmed Sani , Loubna Karbil This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 22:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.PR
keywords asymmetric copulastopological orderingequivalence relationsubcopulasasymmetry measuresCobb-Douglas utility
0
0 comments X

The pith

A topological argument orders copulas into at least three classes via an equivalence relation to support asymmetry measures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper revisits the concept of asymmetric copulas and sharpens its definition. It supplies a topological argument that places copulas into at least three ordered classes under a suitable equivalence relation. This structure makes it possible to define asymmetry measures in a rigorous way. Ordering subcopulas then clarifies how much asymmetry is present, and the method is shown on the asymmetric Cobb-Douglas utility model.

Core claim

The concept of asymmetric copulas is revisited and is made more precise. We give a rigorous topological argument for opportunity to define asymmetry measures defined recently by K.F Siburg through exhibiting at least three ordered classes of copulas according to a suitable equivalence relation. We define a process of ordering subcopulas which makes clearer the degree of asymmetry. As illustration, we treat the asymmetric Cobb-Douglas utility model.

What carries the argument

The equivalence relation on copulas that induces a topological ordering into at least three distinct classes.

If this is right

  • Asymmetry measures can be defined rigorously once the ordered classes are exhibited.
  • The degree of asymmetry becomes clearer through the defined ordering process on subcopulas.
  • The ordering applies directly to concrete models such as the asymmetric Cobb-Douglas utility function.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same equivalence-based ordering might apply to other dependence concepts that share a topological structure.
  • Data-driven checks could test whether observed bivariate distributions fall into the predicted classes.
  • The approach could be extended to higher-dimensional copulas if the equivalence relation generalizes.

Load-bearing premise

A suitable equivalence relation on copulas exists that permits a topological ordering into at least three distinct classes aligned with the asymmetry measures.

What would settle it

A demonstration that the space of copulas admits no equivalence relation producing at least three ordered classes that align with the proposed asymmetry measures would disprove the argument.

read the original abstract

The concept of asymmetric copulas is revisited and is made more precise. We give a rigorous topological argument for opportunity to define asymmetry measures defined recently by K.F Siburg [6] through exhibiting at least three ordered classes of copulas according to a suitable equivalence relation. We define a process of ordering subcopulas which makes clearer the degree of asymmetry. As illustration, we treat the asymmetric Cobb-Douglas utility model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper revisits the concept of asymmetric copulas to make it more precise. It claims to supply a rigorous topological argument supporting the asymmetry measures from Siburg [6] by exhibiting at least three ordered classes of copulas under a suitable equivalence relation. It further defines a process for ordering subcopulas to clarify degrees of asymmetry and illustrates the approach with the asymmetric Cobb-Douglas utility model.

Significance. If the topological construction is independent and the equivalence relation is well-defined, the work would supply a foundation for asymmetry measures in copula theory, aiding the analysis of asymmetric dependence structures. The subcopula ordering process could offer a concrete way to rank asymmetry.

major comments (1)
  1. [section presenting the equivalence relation and topological argument] The section presenting the equivalence relation and the topological argument must demonstrate that this relation is defined independently of the asymmetry measures in [6]; otherwise the claim that the construction justifies those measures risks circularity, as the classes may simply reproduce quantities already fixed by the prior definition.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract is terse; expanding it to name the specific equivalence relation or the three classes would improve readability.
  2. Verify that the bibliography entry for [6] is complete and that all citations are consistent.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [section presenting the equivalence relation and topological argument] The section presenting the equivalence relation and the topological argument must demonstrate that this relation is defined independently of the asymmetry measures in [6]; otherwise the claim that the construction justifies those measures risks circularity, as the classes may simply reproduce quantities already fixed by the prior definition.

    Authors: We agree that explicit independence must be shown to avoid any appearance of circularity. The equivalence relation is introduced via the topology on the space of copulas and the subcopula ordering process, both of which are defined without reference to the measures in [6]. The subsequent ordering of classes is then used to justify those measures. Nevertheless, to remove any possible ambiguity we will revise the relevant section by adding a short preliminary subsection that states the equivalence relation and the topological ordering using only intrinsic properties of copulas and subcopulas, before any mention of [6]. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper's core claim is a topological argument that exhibits at least three ordered classes of copulas under a suitable equivalence relation, thereby supporting the opportunity to define asymmetry measures previously introduced in the external reference [6]. The abstract and description present the exhibition of classes and the defined ordering process on subcopulas as the direct, independent supporting evidence. No equations or steps are shown that reduce a claimed prediction or result to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The cited measures originate outside the present authors' prior work, and the new topological construction does not appear to rename or reconstruct quantities already fixed by [6]. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; no information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities is provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5578 in / 1013 out tokens · 19724 ms · 2026-05-24T22:01:48.981833+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Sklar; Fonctions de r´ epartition ` a n dimensions et leurs marges. Publ. Inst. Statist. Univ. Paris. 8, 229-231. (1959)

    work page 1959

  2. [2]

    Roger B. Nelsen. An Introduction to Copulas . Springer Series in Statistics. Springer Sci- ence+Business Media, Inc., New York, 2 nd edition, (2006)

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    J. Tang, K. Wang, L.Shao. Supervised Matrix Factorization Hashing for Cross-Modal R e- trieval. Transactions on image Processing, Vol. 25, NO. 7, July (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Model Reduction in Power Systems Using Krylov Subspace Meth ods IEEE transaction on power systems, Vol. 20, NO. 2, may 2005

    work page 2005

  5. [5]

    Stoimenov A copula based nonparametric measure of regression dependence

    H.Dette, K.F Siburg and P. Stoimenov A copula based nonparametric measure of regression dependence. (Preprint) Submitted to The Annals of Statistics. (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    An order of asymmetry in copulas, and implications for risk m anagement

    Siburg et al. An order of asymmetry in copulas, and implications for risk m anagement. Insur- ance: Mathematics and Economics. Volume 68, 247-251. (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    On the asymptotic distribution of a general measure of monotone dependence

    Cifarelli, D.M.; Conti, P.L.; Regazzini, E. On the asymptotic distribution of a general measure of monotone dependence. Ann. Statist. 24, 1386-1399. (1996)

    work page 1996

  8. [8]

    How non-symmetric can a copula be? Comment

    Klement, E., Mesiar, R., . How non-symmetric can a copula be? Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 47, 141148. (2006)

    work page 2006

  9. [9]

    Note on the measures of dependence in terms of copulas

    Ayumi Ida, Naoyuki Ishimuraa, MasaAki Nakamura. Note on the measures of dependence in terms of copulas. Procedia Economics and Finance 14 . 273-279. (2014)

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    Extremes of nonexchangeability

    Nelsen, R.B., 2007. Extremes of nonexchangeability . Statist. Papers 48, 329-336

    work page 2007

  11. [11]

    Gonz` alez-Barrios

    Arturo Erdely Jos´ e M. Gonz` alez-Barrios. A nonparametric symmetry test for absolutely continuous bivariate copulas Stat Methods Appl (2010) 19:541565. DOI 10.1007/s10260-010- 0147-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s10260-010- 2010

  12. [12]

    Patil, P.P

    P.N. Patil, P.P. Patil, and Bagkavos. A measure of asymmetry D. Stat Papers (2012) 53: 971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-011-0401-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s00362-011-0401-6 2012

  13. [13]

    Extending Noether's theorem by quantifying the asymmetry of quantum states

    Iman Marvian, and Robert W. Spekkens Extending Noether’s theorem by quantifying the asymmetry of quantum states. arXiv:1404.3236v1 [quant-ph] 11 Apr 2014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  14. [14]

    D. Black. On Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem . The Journal of Law and Economics Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 227-248 (Oct., 1969)

    work page 1969

  15. [15]

    Z. Yuan. A New Explanation of K. J. Arrows Impossibility Theorem: On C onditions of Social Welfare Functions. Open Journal of Political Science, 5, 26-39, 2015

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    V Krylov On the Calderon-Zygmund theorem and application to parabol ic equations

    N. V Krylov On the Calderon-Zygmund theorem and application to parabol ic equations. St Petersburg math. J 13 , 509-525. (2002)

    work page 2002

  17. [17]

    American Mathematical Society

    L.C Evans, Partial differential equations. American Mathematical Society. Providence, RI.(1998)

    work page 1998

  18. [18]

    Choquet and Amiel Feinstein (Translator)

    G. Choquet and Amiel Feinstein (Translator). Topology. Pure and Applied Mathematics. Aca- demic Press, 1 st edition, Volume 19.(April 11, 1966)

    work page 1966

  19. [19]

    H. Brezis. Analyse fonctionnelle : Th´ eorie et applications . (Mathematiques Appliqu´ ees pour la Maitrise.) Paris : Masson, (1983)

    work page 1983

  20. [20]

    H. Brezis. Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differenti al Equations. Springer. (2011)

    work page 2011

  21. [21]

    Genest, J

    C. Genest, J. Quessy. Neslehov` a,. Tests of symmetry for bivariate copulas. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 64, 811834. (2012)

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    Sani and H

    A. Sani and H. Laasri Evolution equations governed by Lipschitz continuous nona utonomous forms. Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal 65(2) 475-491. (20 15) 12 AHMED SANI AND LOUBNA KARBIL Universit´ e Ibn Zohr, F acult´ e des Sciences, D ´ epartement de Math´ ematiques, Agadir, Maroc E-mail address : ahmedsani82@gmail.com Universit´ e Hassan I, F acult´ e d...

    work page