Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Towards QoS-Aware Recommendations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1907.06392 v2 pith:MG4R5W6M submitted 2019-07-15 cs.MM cs.NI

classification cs.MMcs.NI
keywords qos-awareuserrecommendationsbeenexperiencefeasibilityperformancecontent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper we propose that recommendation systems (RSs) for multimedia services should be "QoS-aware", i.e., take into account the expected QoS with which a content can be delivered, to increase the user satisfaction. Network-aware recommendations have been very recently proposed as a promising solution to improve network performance. However, the idea of QoS-aware RSs has been studied from the network perspective. Its feasibility and performance performance advantages for the content-provider or user perspective have only been speculated. Hence, in this paper we aim to provide initial answers for the feasibility of the concept of QoS-aware RS, by investigating its impact on real user experience. To this end, we conduct experiments with real users on a testbed, and present initial experimental results. Our analysis demonstrates the potential of the idea: QoS-aware RSs could be beneficial for both the users (better experience) and content providers (higher user engagement). Moreover, based on the collected dataset, we build statistical models to (i) predict the user experience as a function of QoS, relevance of recommendations (QoR) and user interest, and (ii) provide useful insights for the design of QoS-aware RSs. We believe that our study is an important first step towards QoS-aware recommendations, by providing experimental evidence for their feasibility and benefits, and can help open a future research direction.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools