Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Constant Factor Approximation for Capacitated Min-Max Tree Cover

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1907.08304 v2 pith:SOVUUBKM submitted 2019-07-18 cs.DS

classification cs.DS
keywords treesverticesproblemapproximationcovergraphlambdaversion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Given a graph $G=(V,E)$ with non-negative real edge lengths and an integer parameter $k$, the Min-Max k-Tree Cover problem seeks to find a set of at most $k$ subtrees of $G$, such that the union of the trees is the vertex set $V$. The objective is to minimize the maximum length among all the trees. We give the first constant factor approximation for the hard uniform capacitated version of this problem, where, an input parameter $\lambda$ upper bounds the number of vertices that can be covered by any of the trees. Our result extends to the rooted version of the problem, where we are given a set of $k$ root vertices, $R$ and each of the covering trees is required to include a distinct vertex in $R$ as the root. Prior to our work, the only result known was a $(2k-1)$-approximation algorithm for the special case when the total number of vertices in the graph is $k\lambda$ [Guttmann-Beck and Hassin, J. of Algorithms, 1997]. Our technique circumvents the difficulty of using the minimum spanning tree of the graph as a lower bound, which is standard for the uncapacitated version of the problem [Even et al., OR Letters 2004] [Khani et al., Algorithmica 2010]. Instead, we use Steiner trees that cover $\lambda$ vertices along with an iterative refinement procedure that ensures that the output trees have low cost and the vertices are well distributed among the trees.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools