pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.09125 · v1 · pith:7CHZ7KVAnew · submitted 2019-07-16 · 📡 eess.SP · cs.NA· math.NA

Second-order Time-Reassigned Synchrosqueezing Transform: Application to Draupner Wave Analysis

Dominique Fourer , Fran\c{c}ois Auger This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 20:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP cs.NAmath.NA
keywords synchrosqueezingtime-reassignedtime-frequency analysisDraupner wavesecond-orderimpulsive signalsnon-stationary signalsreversible transform
0
0 comments X

The pith

A second-order time-reassigned synchrosqueezing transform yields sharpened and reversible time-frequency representations for impulsive or strongly modulated signals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a second-order enhancement to time-reassigned synchrosqueezing that targets non-stationary multicomponent signals. It establishes theoretical links to earlier versions of the method and demonstrates through experiments on synthetic data and the Draupner wave record that the new approach produces clearer, invertible time-frequency maps. A reader would care because many real signals in engineering and oceanography contain abrupt changes or rapid frequency shifts that standard transforms smear out. The work focuses on making these representations both sharper and usable for reconstruction.

Core claim

We introduce a novel enhancement of the time-reassigned synchrosqueezing method designed to compute sharpened and reversible representations of impulsive or strongly modulated signals. After establishing theoretical relations of the new proposed method with our previous results, we illustrate in numerical experiments the improvement brought by our proposal when applied on both synthetic and real-world signals. Our experiments deal with an analysis of the Draupner wave record for which we provide pioneered time-frequency analysis results.

What carries the argument

The second-order time-reassigned synchrosqueezing transform, which performs reassignment using second-order phase information to sharpen time-frequency energy while preserving invertibility.

If this is right

  • Signals with strong time-frequency modulation can be represented with reduced smearing while remaining invertible for reconstruction.
  • The Draupner wave record receives the first published time-frequency analysis using this sharpened approach.
  • The method extends prior synchrosqueezing results to handle impulsive features without loss of theoretical guarantees.
  • Numerical tests on both synthetic and measured data confirm visible sharpening relative to earlier versions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same second-order reassignment step could be tested on other impulsive ocean or seismic records to check consistency of the sharpening effect.
  • Because the output remains invertible, the transform might support downstream tasks such as component separation or denoising that require perfect reconstruction.
  • If the second-order phase correction proves stable, it could be combined with existing synchrosqueezing variants for even higher-order modulation.

Load-bearing premise

The theoretical relations shown for first-order reassignment carry over directly to the second-order case and the Draupner experiments reflect genuine gains rather than tuning artifacts.

What would settle it

Applying the second-order transform to the same Draupner wave record and obtaining time-frequency maps that are no sharper or no more invertible than those from the first-order version would falsify the claimed improvement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.09125 by Dominique Fourer, Fran\c{c}ois Auger.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Comparisons of the resulting TFRs of a synthetic multicomponent signal. The TFRs obtained using the synchrosqueezing methods (b),(c), (e) and (f) correpond to their squared modulus. 3 Second-order horizontal synchrosqueezing 3.1 Enhanced group-delay estimation Let’s consider a linear chirp signal model expressed as [18]: x(t) = e λx(t)+jφx(t) (15) with λx(t) = lx + µxt + νx t 2 2 (16) and φx(t) = ϕx + ωxt … view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Method RQF (dB) STFT 269.27 classical synchrosqueezing 35.89 second-order vertical synchrosqueezing 23.80 time-reassigned synchrosqueezing 116.67 second-order time-reassigned synchrosqueezing 116.67 0 5 10 15 20 time [min] -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 elevation [m] (a) signal L=25.00 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 time [min] 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 frequency [Hz] (b) synchrosqueezing L=25.00 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 1… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Waveform (a) and TFRs of the Draupner wave signal. spectrogram (d), syn￾chrosqueezing (b), second-order vertical synchrosqueezing (c), time-reassigned syn￾chrosqueezing (e) and second-order horizontal synchrosqueezing (f). 4.2.1 Time-frequency representation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Saliency function G(t) deduced from second-order horizontal syn￾chrosqueezed STFT (a) and reconstructed signal after applying mask on time￾reassigned synchrosqueezed STFT. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper addresses the problem of efficiently jointly representing a non-stationary multicomponent signal in time and frequency. We introduce a novel enhancement of the time-reassigned synchrosqueezing method designed to compute sharpened and reversible representations of impulsive or strongly modulated signals. After establishing theoretical relations of the new proposed method with our previous results, we illustrate in numerical experiments the improvement brought by our proposal when applied on both synthetic and real-world signals. Our experiments deal with an analysis of the Draupner wave record for which we provide pioneered time-frequency analysis results.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a second-order time-reassigned synchrosqueezing transform (STSST) as an enhancement of the time-reassigned synchrosqueezing method to produce sharpened, reversible time-frequency representations of impulsive or strongly modulated multicomponent signals. It claims to establish theoretical relations between the new method and the authors' prior first-order results, then demonstrates numerical improvements on both synthetic signals and the real-world Draupner wave record.

Significance. If the second-order extension preserves invertibility and sharpening properties while delivering robust gains on impulsive signals, the method could provide a practical advance for time-frequency analysis of non-stationary signals with rapid frequency changes, particularly in applications such as ocean-wave rogue-event detection. The Draupner analysis supplies a concrete, high-visibility real-world test case.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'theoretical relations with our previous results' are established is not accompanied by any explicit statement of the new instantaneous-frequency estimator, the form of the second-order correction term, or a derivation showing that this term commutes with the reassignment operator while preserving invertibility; without these elements the central claim that the second-order operator extends the first-order guarantees cannot be verified.
  2. [Numerical experiments] Numerical experiments (Draupner section): the reported improvement is presented without ablation or sensitivity analysis on the second-order window length or reassignment threshold; this leaves open the possibility that observed sharpening arises from post-hoc parameter adjustment rather than the second-order term itself, undermining the claim of genuine methodological advance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and the recommendation for major revision. We address each major comment point by point below, proposing revisions to improve clarity and robustness.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'theoretical relations with our previous results' are established is not accompanied by any explicit statement of the new instantaneous-frequency estimator, the form of the second-order correction term, or a derivation showing that this term commutes with the reassignment operator while preserving invertibility; without these elements the central claim that the second-order operator extends the first-order guarantees cannot be verified.

    Authors: The abstract is intentionally concise as an overview. The explicit form of the second-order instantaneous-frequency estimator, the correction term, and the full derivation establishing commutativity with the reassignment operator while preserving invertibility are detailed in Section 3, building directly on the first-order results from our prior work. We will revise the abstract to include a brief statement of the new estimator and correction term, along with a reference to the theoretical guarantees in Section 3. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical experiments] Numerical experiments (Draupner section): the reported improvement is presented without ablation or sensitivity analysis on the second-order window length or reassignment threshold; this leaves open the possibility that observed sharpening arises from post-hoc parameter adjustment rather than the second-order term itself, undermining the claim of genuine methodological advance.

    Authors: The parameters in the Draupner experiments were selected consistently with the theoretical analysis and our prior first-order results. We agree that an explicit sensitivity study would strengthen the claim. In the revised manuscript we will add a sensitivity analysis on the second-order window length and reassignment threshold for the Draupner record, confirming that the sharpening gains are attributable to the second-order term across a range of reasonable parameter values. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Self-citation to prior first-order results noted but not load-bearing for the second-order extension

full rationale

The paper states it establishes 'theoretical relations of the new proposed method with our previous results' before presenting numerical experiments on synthetic and Draupner signals. This is a standard self-citation to the authors' earlier first-order time-reassigned synchrosqueezing work. No equation in the provided text reduces the new second-order operator, invertibility claim, or sharpening property to a fitted parameter or direct renaming of prior outputs. The central contribution (second-order correction for impulsive signals) retains independent mathematical content and experimental illustration outside the cited relations, so the self-reference does not force the result by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no equations or implementation details, so no specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified from the given text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5621 in / 968 out tokens · 17562 ms · 2026-05-24T20:36:42.216522+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Cohen, Time-Frequency Analysis: Theory and Applications

    L. Cohen, Time-Frequency Analysis: Theory and Applications . Prentice Hall, 1995

    work page 1995

  2. [2]

    Flandrin, Time-Frequency/Time-Scale analysis

    P. Flandrin, Time-Frequency/Time-Scale analysis. Acad. Press, 1998

    work page 1998

  3. [3]

    Hlawatsch and F

    F. Hlawatsch and F. Auger, Eds., Time-Frequency Analysis: Concepts and Meth- ods. ISTE-Wiley, 2008

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Flandrin, Explorations in Time-Frequency Analysis

    P. Flandrin, Explorations in Time-Frequency Analysis . Cambridge University Press, 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Decomposition of Hardy functions into square integrable wavelets of constant shape,

    A. Grosssmann and J. Morlet, “Decomposition of Hardy functions into square integrable wavelets of constant shape,” IAM Journal of Mathematical Analysis , vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 723–736, 1984

    work page 1984

  6. [6]

    Klapuri and M

    A. Klapuri and M. Davy, Eds., Signal Processing Methods for Music Transcrip- tion. Springer US, 2006

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    Analysis of neonatal EEG signals using Stockwell transform,

    K.-K. Poh and P. Marziliano, “Analysis of neonatal EEG signals using Stockwell transform,” in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2007. EMBS 2007. 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE , Aug. 2007, pp. 594–597

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    Analysis of time-varying signals with small BT values,

    K. Kodera, R. Gendrin, and C. de Villedary, “Analysis of time-varying signals with small BT values,” IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. , vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 64–76, Feb. 1978

    work page 1978

  9. [9]

    Improving the readability of time-frequency and time- scale representations by the reassignment method,

    F. Auger and P. Flandrin, “Improving the readability of time-frequency and time- scale representations by the reassignment method,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1068–1089, May 1995. 9

    work page 1995

  10. [10]

    Synchrosqueezed wavelet transforms: An empirical mode decomposition-like tool,

    I. Daubechies, J. Lu, and H.-T. Wu, “Synchrosqueezed wavelet transforms: An empirical mode decomposition-like tool,” Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 243–261, 2011

    work page 2011

  11. [11]

    TF reassignment and synchrosqueezing: An overview,

    F. Auger, P. Flandrin, Y . Lin, S. McLaughlin, S. Meignen, T. Oberlin, and H. Wu, “TF reassignment and synchrosqueezing: An overview,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 32–41, Nov. 2013

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    A novel thresholding technique for the denoising of multicomponent signals,

    D.-H. Pham and S. Meignen, “A novel thresholding technique for the denoising of multicomponent signals,” 2018

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Time–frequency filtering based on spectrogram zeros,

    P. Flandrin, “Time–frequency filtering based on spectrogram zeros,”IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 2137–2141, 2015

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    Fast and adaptive blind audio source separation using recursive levenberg-marquardt synchrosqueezing,

    D. Fourer and G. Peeters, “Fast and adaptive blind audio source separation using recursive levenberg-marquardt synchrosqueezing,” in Proc. IEEE ICASSP , Cal- gary, Canada, Apr. 2018

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Recursive versions of the Levenberg- Marquardt reassigned spectrogram and of the synchrosqueezed STFT,

    D. Fourer, F. Auger, and P. Flandrin, “Recursive versions of the Levenberg- Marquardt reassigned spectrogram and of the synchrosqueezed STFT,” in Proc. IEEE ICASSP, Mar. 2016, pp. 4880–4884

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    The ASTRES toolbox for mode extraction of non-stationary mul- ticomponent signals,

    D. Fourer, J. Harmouche, J. Schmitt, T. Oberlin, S. Meignen, F. Auger, and P. Flandrin, “The ASTRES toolbox for mode extraction of non-stationary mul- ticomponent signals,” in Proc. EUSIPCO 2017 , Kos Island, Greece, Aug. 2017, pp. 1170–1174

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Second-order synchrosqueezing trans- form or invertible reassignment? Towards ideal time-frequency representations,

    T. Oberlin, S. Meignen, and V . Perrier, “Second-order synchrosqueezing trans- form or invertible reassignment? Towards ideal time-frequency representations,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 1335–1344, Mar. 2015

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    Chirp rate and instantaneous frequency estimation: application to recursive vertical syn- chrosqueezing,

    D. Fourer, F. Auger, K. Czarnecki, S. Meignen, and P. Flandrin, “Chirp rate and instantaneous frequency estimation: application to recursive vertical syn- chrosqueezing,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett., 2017

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    High-order synchrosqueezing transform for mul- ticomponent signals analysis-with an application to gravitational-wave signal

    D. H. Pham and S. Meignen, “High-order synchrosqueezing transform for mul- ticomponent signals analysis-with an application to gravitational-wave signal.” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 3168–3178, 2017

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Time-reassigned synchrosqueezing trans- form: The algorithm and its applications in mechanical signal processing,

    D. He, H. Cao, S. Wang, and X. Chen, “Time-reassigned synchrosqueezing trans- form: The algorithm and its applications in mechanical signal processing,” Me- chanical Systems and Signal Processing , vol. 117, pp. 255–279, 2019

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Theoretical analysis of the second-order synchrosqueezing transform,

    R. Behera, S. Meignen, and T. Oberlin, “Theoretical analysis of the second-order synchrosqueezing transform,” Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis , Nov. 2016

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    Local AM/FM parameters estimation: ap- plication to sinusoidal modeling and blind audio source separation,

    D. Fourer, F. Auger, and G. Peeters, “Local AM/FM parameters estimation: ap- plication to sinusoidal modeling and blind audio source separation,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 25, pp. 1600–1604, Oct. 2018. 10

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    A possible freak wave event measured at the draupner jacket january 1 1995,

    S. Haver, “A possible freak wave event measured at the draupner jacket january 1 1995,” in Rogue waves, vol. 2004, 2004, pp. 1–8. 11

    work page 1995