pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.09131 · v1 · pith:HYCHPDTPnew · submitted 2019-07-22 · 📡 eess.SP · cs.SY· eess.SY

Capacitive Sensor Based 2D Subsurface Imaging Technology for Non Destructive Evaluation of Building Surfaces

Lasitha Piyathilaka , Basura Sooriyaarachchi , Sarath Kodagoda , Karthick Thiyagarajan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 18:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP cs.SYeess.SY
keywords capacitive sensorsubsurface imagingnon-destructive evaluationbuilding surfaces2D imagingconcretewoodfinite element analysis
0
0 comments X

The pith

A capacitive sensor generates real-time 2D subsurface images of building surfaces without damage.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents a capacitive sensor technology designed for non-destructive evaluation of building surfaces. The sensor creates real-time 2D images that reveal structures hidden beneath the top layer of materials like wood and concrete. Such capability matters because maintenance and modification work on buildings often requires knowing what lies underneath without causing harm. Finite element simulations guided the sensor design, and custom hardware enables the imaging.

Core claim

The capacitive sensing technology can see through common building materials like wood and concrete and generate useful 2D subsurface images for non-destructive evaluation.

What carries the argument

The custom capacitive sensor head, optimized via finite element analysis, that produces real-time 2D images of subsurface structures.

If this is right

  • Building maintenance can proceed with visual guidance on hidden pipes, wires, or reinforcements.
  • Non-destructive checks become possible on floors and walls during modifications.
  • The real-time aspect allows immediate feedback during scanning.
  • Laboratory validation confirms detection through wood and concrete samples.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future versions could be mounted on robots for automated building inspections.
  • Integration with other sensors might improve accuracy in complex environments.
  • Applications could extend to detecting moisture or damage in historical structures.

Load-bearing premise

The performance observed in controlled lab tests on wood and concrete samples holds for actual building surfaces with varying moisture, thickness, and composition.

What would settle it

Conducting the sensor tests on real building walls and floors under different environmental conditions and comparing the images to known subsurface features or destructive verification.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.09131 by Basura Sooriyaarachchi, Karthick Thiyagarajan, Lasitha Piyathilaka, Sarath Kodagoda.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Scans are done by moving the sensor on the top surface [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Simulation Setup in Ansys Maxwell However, it decreases the percentage change of capacitance caused by the specimen being tested which in turn can decrease the sensitivity of the sensor [8]–[10]. When designing a capacitive sensor, one of the major challenges is maximizing the change in capacitance caused by the specimen being tested while minimizing the effect on the capacitance from neighboring objects. … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Simulations by varying electrode lift-off distance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Simulations for different electrode shapes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Hardware components of the sensor head. of the electrodes and connected to the shield to reduce the effect of noise and stray capacitance on the results. FDC 1004 implements a switched capacitor circuit to trans￾fer charge from the sensor electrode to the sigma-delta analog to digital converter (ADC). The sensor uses a 25 kHz step waveform to charge the electrode and this charge is passed on to the sample … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Detecting metal bars located behind a plywood sheet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Detecting wooden studs behind a wall (a) A metal bar and a wood bar are placed behind a 25 mm plywood sheet. Scans were done on the top surface, perpendicular to the bars (b) Capacitance values for each scan. Metal bar resulted in a higher peak than than the wooden bar (c) 2D Subsurface image with indication of metal and wood bar locations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Detecting metal bars and wooden bars located behind [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Understanding the underlying structure of building surfaces like walls and floors is essential when carrying out building maintenance and modification work. To facilitate such work, this paper introduces a capacitive sensor-based technology which can conduct non-destructive evaluation of building surfaces. The novelty of this sensor is that it can generate a real-time 2D subsurface image which can be used to understand structure beneath the top surface. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) simulations are done to understand the best sensor head configuration that gives optimum results. Hardware and software components are custom-built to facilitate real-time imaging capability. The sensor is validated by laboratory tests, which revealed the ability of the proposed capacitive sensing technology to see through common building materials like wood and concrete. The 2D image generated by the sensor is found to be useful in understanding the subsurface structure beneath the top surface.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims to introduce a capacitive sensor-based technology for non-destructive evaluation of building surfaces that generates real-time 2D subsurface images. It uses FEA simulations to optimize the sensor head configuration, develops custom hardware and software for real-time operation, and validates the system via laboratory tests on wood and concrete samples, asserting that the sensor can image subsurface structures through these common building materials.

Significance. If supported by quantitative evidence, the approach could provide a practical NDE tool for building maintenance by enabling non-destructive subsurface visualization. The use of FEA for design optimization and the emphasis on real-time imaging represent engineering strengths in sensor development.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the manuscript states that FEA simulations and laboratory validation were performed and that tests 'revealed the ability' to see through materials and generate 'useful' 2D images, but supplies no quantitative results, error metrics, resolution figures, depth penetration data, or image quality statistics. This is load-bearing for the central claim, as the performance assertions cannot be evaluated from the given information.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review and the recommendation for major revision. We address the single major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the manuscript states that FEA simulations and laboratory validation were performed and that tests 'revealed the ability' to see through materials and generate 'useful' 2D images, but supplies no quantitative results, error metrics, resolution figures, depth penetration data, or image quality statistics. This is load-bearing for the central claim, as the performance assertions cannot be evaluated from the given information.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by the inclusion of quantitative performance metrics. The body of the manuscript reports specific results from the FEA optimization (sensor head geometry yielding maximum sensitivity) and laboratory validation (measured capacitance variations and resulting 2D image fidelity on wood and concrete specimens). In the revised manuscript we will update the abstract to include key figures such as achieved penetration depth and spatial resolution drawn from those sections, thereby making the central claims directly evaluable from the abstract as well. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental engineering validation with no derivation chain

full rationale

The paper describes an engineering prototype using FEA for sensor design, custom hardware/software for real-time 2D imaging, and laboratory validation on wood/concrete samples. No mathematical derivation, parameter fitting to data, self-referential predictions, or load-bearing self-citations are present. The central claim rests on empirical test results rather than any closed logical loop reducing outputs to inputs by construction. This is a standard non-circular experimental development paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the sensor physics and FEA assumptions are not detailed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5696 in / 983 out tokens · 17719 ms · 2026-05-24T18:18:29.622476+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

12 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Pulsed eddy current sensing for condition assessment of reinforced concrete,

    N. Ulapane, S. Wickramanayake, and S. Kodagoda, “Pulsed eddy current sensing for condition assessment of reinforced concrete,” in 14th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications , 2020

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Some convolution and scale transformation techniques to enhance gpr images,

    N. Ulapane, L. Piyathilaka, and S. Kodagoda, “Some convolution and scale transformation techniques to enhance gpr images,” in The 14th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA 2019), 2019

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Real-time 3d profiling with rgb-d mapping in pipelines using stereo camera vision and structured ir laser ring,

    A. Gunatilake, L. Piyathilaka, S. Kodagoda, S. Barclay, and D. Vitanage, “Real-time 3d profiling with rgb-d mapping in pipelines using stereo camera vision and structured ir laser ring,” in The 14th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications 2019 , 2019

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Robust Sensor Technologies Combined with Smart Predictive Analytics for Hostile Sewer Infrastructures,

    K. Thiyagarajan, “Robust Sensor Technologies Combined with Smart Predictive Analytics for Hostile Sewer Infrastructures,” Ph.D. disserta- tion, University of Technology Sydney, 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Frequency sweep based sensing technology for non-destructive electri- cal resistivity measurement of concrete,

    S. Wickramanayake, K. Thiyagarajan, S. Kodagoda, and L. Piyathilaka, “Frequency sweep based sensing technology for non-destructive electri- cal resistivity measurement of concrete,” in 36 International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction , 2019

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Design and development of drill-resistance sensor technology for accurately measuring microbiologically corroded concrete depths,

    N. Giovanangelia, L. Piyathilaka, S. Kodagoda, K. Thiyagarajan, S. Bar- clay, and D. Vitanage, “Design and development of drill-resistance sensor technology for accurately measuring microbiologically corroded concrete depths,” in 36 International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction , 2019

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Robust sensing suite for measuring temporal dynamics of surface temperature in sewers,

    K. Thiyagarajan, S. Kodagoda, R. Ranasinghe, D. Vitanage, and G. Iori, “Robust sensing suite for measuring temporal dynamics of surface temperature in sewers,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, 2018

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Non-destructive evaluation of concrete using a capacitive imaging technique: Preliminary modelling and experiments,

    X. Yin, D. Hutchins, G. Diamond, and P. Purnell, “Non-destructive evaluation of concrete using a capacitive imaging technique: Preliminary modelling and experiments,” Cement and Concrete Research , vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 1734–1743, 2010

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    Soft capacitive sensor for structural health monitoring of large-scale systems,

    S. Laflamme, M. Kollosche, J. J. Connor, and G. Kofod, “Soft capacitive sensor for structural health monitoring of large-scale systems,”Structural Control and Health Monitoring , vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 70–81, 2012

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    Studies of the factors influencing the imaging performance of the capacitive imaging technique,

    X. Yin, D. A. Hutchins, G. Chen, W. Li, and Z. Xu, “Studies of the factors influencing the imaging performance of the capacitive imaging technique,” NDT & E International , vol. 60, pp. 1–10, 2013

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    4 Channel Capacitance to Digital Converter for Capacitive Sensing (Cap Sensing) Solutions,

    “4 Channel Capacitance to Digital Converter for Capacitive Sensing (Cap Sensing) Solutions,” accessed 12-07-2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.ti.com/product/FDC1004

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Gaussian Markov Random Fields for Localizing Reinforcing Bars in Concrete Infrastructure,

    K. Thiyagarajan, S. Kodagoda, L. V . Nguyen, and S. Wickramanayake, “Gaussian Markov Random Fields for Localizing Reinforcing Bars in Concrete Infrastructure,” in 2018 Proceedings of the 35th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction . Berlin: IAARC, 2018, pp. 1052–1058

    work page 2018