Constraining Dark Energy Perturbations: the Role of Early Dark Energy

Archita Bhattacharyya; Supratik Pal

arxiv: 1907.10946 · v1 · pith:GRRTROZMnew · submitted 2019-07-25 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Constraining Dark Energy Perturbations: the Role of Early Dark Energy

Archita Bhattacharyya , Supratik Pal This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 16:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO

keywords dark energy perturbationsearly dark energysound speedcosmological constraintsequation of statematter power spectrumquintessence

0 comments

The pith

An early dark energy parametrization lets current data constrain dark energy sound speed to about 0.14.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Dark energy affects the universe not only through its background equation of state but also by clustering when its sound speed is low enough. In standard quintessence, sound speed equals the speed of light and the equation of state stays near -1, so perturbations stay decoupled from matter and leave almost no trace. The paper adopts an early dark energy parametrization that keeps a non-negligible density at early times and lets the equation of state move well away from -1, allowing the (1 + w_DE) term to source perturbations into the metric and matter power spectrum. With this setup, current datasets bound the sound speed to roughly 0.14 and the early density parameter to roughly 0.02. The work also compares results when the sound speed is fixed at 1 versus left free, showing how dataset choices shift the allowed ranges.

Core claim

For dynamical dark energy with w_DE close to -1, perturbations are suppressed by the (1 + w_DE) factor and further washed out on sub-Hubble scales when the sound speed equals the speed of light. An early dark energy parametrization that maintains appreciable density at early epochs and permits w_DE to depart from -1 makes the perturbations detectable; current data then constrain c^2_sDE ~ 0.14 and Omega_e ~ 0.02 while still allowing a wider range for the early density than in the sound-speed-equals-one case.

What carries the argument

Early dark energy parametrization that keeps non-negligible density at early times and drives w_DE away from -1, thereby sourcing dark energy perturbations through the (1 + w_DE) term.

If this is right

Dark energy perturbations leave measurable imprints on the matter power spectrum once w_DE is allowed to depart from -1 early.
The sound speed can be bounded well below the speed of light rather than remaining degenerate with 1.
Early dark energy density obtains a higher allowed range yet receives tight constraints around 0.02.
Different datasets produce different shifts in parameter posteriors when the sound speed is left free versus fixed at 1.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same parametrization might be used to test whether early dark energy can ease the Hubble tension by altering perturbation growth at intermediate redshifts.
High-resolution weak-lensing or galaxy-clustering surveys could provide an independent check on the low sound-speed value.
If the low sound speed persists, it would favor models in which dark energy clusters on scales that standard quintessence cannot reach.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen parametrization correctly captures how the dark energy equation of state evolves with time and the perturbation equations remain valid once w_DE moves away from -1 at early epochs.

What would settle it

A future dataset that forces the best-fit sound speed back to exactly 1, or that shows no statistical improvement when early dark energy density is allowed near 0.02, would falsify the central result.

read the original abstract

Dark Energy not only has background effects through its equation of state $w_{DE}$, but also it can cluster through its sound speed $c^2_{sDE}$, subject to certain conditions. As is well-known, for dynamical dark energy models, dark energy perturbations get sourced into matter perturbations through metric perturbations which is always accompanied by the term $(1+w_{DE})$. Hence, for dynamical dark energy models with $w_{DE}$ close $-1$, their perturbations get almost decoupled from metric leaving nearly null imprints on matter power spectra. Furthermore, Quintessence models with its sound speed equal to speed of light, washes out almost any inhomogeneities occurred within sub-Hubble scales, hence making detectability of dark energy perturbations far more difficult than already is. In this article we look for these imprints by going beyond Quintessence considering an Early Dark Energy parametrization that not only have a non-negligible energy density at early times, but also it can achieve $w_{DE}$ far from $-1$, making dark energy perturbations detectable in sub-horizon scales. With the help of current datasets, we are able to constrain sound speed of dark energy to a low value ($c^2_{sDE} \sim 0.14$), along with a much higher range allowed for early dark energy density, with strong constraints on it ($\Omega_e \sim 0.02$). We discuss effects of different datasets on this parametrization along with possible explanation for deviation on certain parameter(s) comparing between $c^2_{sDE}=1$ case and the case where it is kept open.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper supplies new numerical bounds on dark energy sound speed and early density via an EDE parametrization, but the perturbation stability when w_DE moves away from -1 needs explicit verification.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that the authors use an early dark energy parametrization to constrain the dark energy sound speed squared to around 0.14 and the early density parameter to around 0.02 from current datasets. These specific joint numbers are new relative to the literature they cite, even though the underlying linear perturbation framework is standard. They also compare the free sound-speed case against the fixed c_s^2=1 limit and walk through how different datasets shift the parameters, which clarifies where the signal originates. That dataset discussion is the part that actually adds value beyond prior work on dynamical dark energy. The central claim rests on allowing w_DE to depart from -1 at early times so that the (1+w_DE) factor sources perturbations more effectively into the metric and matter sectors. This is a reasonable move on paper. The soft spot is whether the implementation stays numerically stable. Standard fluid equations can develop singularities or require regularization when w_DE is far from -1 at high redshift or interacts with the sound horizon. The abstract flags the sourcing mechanism but does not detail convergence tests, regularization steps, or checks that all fluid variables remain well-behaved down to the redshifts probed by the data. If the full methods section shows those checks and transparent data-selection criteria, the quoted central values become more reliable; otherwise the bounds could be sensitive to implementation choices. The results are direct data constraints rather than quantities forced by the model equations themselves, which avoids circularity. This paper is for people already working on dark energy clustering and early-time modifications. A reader fitting perturbation codes to CMB or large-scale structure data would find the numbers and dataset comparisons useful. It shows clear engagement with the technical literature and produces falsifiable outputs, so it deserves a serious referee to examine the stability question and confirm robustness. I would send it to peer review.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that an Early Dark Energy (EDE) parametrization, which permits w_DE to depart substantially from -1 at early times, allows dark energy perturbations to source observable effects on matter perturbations via the (1 + w_DE) factor. Using current cosmological datasets, the authors constrain the dark energy sound speed to c_sDE² ∼ 0.14 and the early dark energy density to Ω_e ∼ 0.02, contrasting this with the c_sDE² = 1 case and discussing dataset impacts.

Significance. If the numerical implementation proves stable, the result would offer a concrete constraint on dark energy clustering beyond quintessence, demonstrating how EDE can enhance detectability of perturbations on sub-horizon scales. The work highlights the interplay between background evolution and perturbation sourcing but lacks explicit validation of numerical robustness.

major comments (1)

[Abstract and EDE parametrization discussion] Abstract (paragraph on sourcing through (1+w_DE)) and the EDE parametrization section: the central claim that w_DE far from -1 enables detectable DE perturbations relies on the standard fluid perturbation equations remaining valid and numerically stable at early times. The manuscript provides no explicit tests, regularization scheme, or stability analysis for cases where w_DE approaches or crosses -1 or where the sound horizon interacts with the Hubble scale at high redshift; this is load-bearing for the reported constraints on c_sDE² and Ω_e.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract quotes specific central values (c_sDE² ∼ 0.14, Ω_e ∼ 0.02) without referencing the corresponding posterior plots, table, or section that reports the full constraints and error bars.
[Abstract] Notation for the sound speed is written inconsistently as c^2_{sDE} in the abstract; standardize to c_{sDE}^2 throughout.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and valuable feedback on our paper. We address the major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and EDE parametrization discussion] Abstract (paragraph on sourcing through (1+w_DE)) and the EDE parametrization section: the central claim that w_DE far from -1 enables detectable DE perturbations relies on the standard fluid perturbation equations remaining valid and numerically stable at early times. The manuscript provides no explicit tests, regularization scheme, or stability analysis for cases where w_DE approaches or crosses -1 or where the sound horizon interacts with the Hubble scale at high redshift; this is load-bearing for the reported constraints on c_sDE² and Ω_e.

Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from explicit discussion of the numerical stability of the perturbation equations. The EDE parametrization is chosen such that w_DE is significantly different from -1 at early times, which is the regime where the constraints are derived. However, we did not include dedicated stability tests in the original submission. In the revised manuscript, we will add a discussion and tests demonstrating the stability of the implementation for the relevant parameter ranges, including when the sound horizon and Hubble scale interact at high redshift. This will include verification that the equations do not exhibit instabilities in the explored parameter space. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper reports observational constraints on dark energy sound speed and early dark energy density obtained by fitting an adopted EDE parametrization to current datasets. These reported numbers (c^2_sDE ~0.14, Omega_e ~0.02) are direct data-driven posteriors rather than quantities that reduce by construction to the model equations or to any self-citation. The derivation consists of standard fluid perturbation equations applied to a chosen parametrization followed by likelihood analysis; no step equates a prediction to a fitted input, renames a known result, or relies on a load-bearing self-citation whose content is itself unverified. The analysis is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of linear cosmological perturbation theory for dynamical dark energy and on the chosen early dark energy parametrization being an adequate description; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)

c_sDE^2
Sound speed squared treated as a free parameter and fitted to data.
Omega_e
Early dark energy density fraction treated as a free parameter and constrained by data.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Linear perturbation equations for dark energy remain valid when w_DE departs from -1.
Invoked in the abstract discussion of sourcing through (1+w_DE).
domain assumption Sound speed is constant across scales and time.
Implicit in the reported single-value constraint.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5824 in / 1387 out tokens · 29126 ms · 2026-05-24T16:06:43.673340+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean (J-uniqueness, Aczél classification) washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Eqs. (2.6)-(2.7) for δ'_DE, θ'_DE and the EDE density parametrization (3.1) with free Ω_e, w0, c_s^2
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

entire analysis of sound-speed constraints from Planck+BAO+SN+DES

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

[1]

A. G. Riess et al. ,Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, Astron. J. 116, (1998) 1009

work page 1998
[2]

Perlmutter et al

S. Perlmutter et al. ,Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 high redshift supernovae, Astrophys. J. 517, (1999) 565

work page 1999
[3]

P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra,The Cosmological constant and dark energy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, (2003) 559

work page 2003
[4]

Sahni and A

V. Sahni and A. Starobinsky,Reconstructing Dark Energy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D15, (2006) 2105

work page 2006
[5]

E. J. Copeland, M. Sami and S. Tsujikawa,Dynamics of dark energy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D15, (2006) 1753

work page 2006
[6]

J. P. Uzan,The acceleration of the universe and the physics behind it, Gen. Rel. Grav.39, (2007) 307

work page 2007
[7]

E. V. Linder,The Dynamics of Quintessence, The Quintessence of Dynamics, Gen. Rel. Grav. 40, (2008) 329

work page 2008
[8]

M. Li, X. D. Li, S. Wang and Y. Wang,Dark Energy, Commun. Theor. Phys.56, (2011) 525

work page 2011
[9]

D. H. Weinberg et al. ,Observational Probes of Cosmic Acceleration, Phys. Rept. 530, (2013) 87-255

work page 2013
[10]

Bahamonde, C

S. Bahamonde, C. G. BÃűhmer, S. Carloni, E. J. Copeland, W. Fang and N. Tamanini, Dynamical systems applied to cosmology: dark energy and modiﬁed gravity, Phys. Rept. 775-777, (2018) 1

work page 2018
[11]

Huterer and D

D. Huterer and D. L. Shafer,Dark energy two decades after: Observables, probes, consistency tests, Rept. Prog. Phys.81, (2018) 016901

work page 2018
[12]

P. A. R. Ade et al. ,Planck 2015 results. XIV. Dark energy and modiﬁed gravity, Astron. Astrophys. 594, (2016) A14

work page 2015
[13]

Ballesteros and J

G. Ballesteros and J. Lesgourgues,Dark energy with non-adiabatic sound speed: initial conditions and detectability, JCAP 1010, (2010) 014

work page 2010
[14]

Creminelli, G

P. Creminelli, G. D’Amico, J. Norena, L. Senatore and F. Vernizzi,Spherical collapse in quintessence models with zero speed of sound, JCAP 1003, (2010) 027

work page 2010
[15]

Sapone, M

D. Sapone, M. Kunz,Fingerprinting Dark Energy, Phys. Rev. D80, (2009) 083519

work page 2009
[16]

Sapone, M

D. Sapone, M. Kunz, L. Amendola,Fingerprinting dark energy. II. Weak lensing and galaxy clustering tests, Phys. Rev. D82, (2010) 103535

work page 2010
[17]

Bean and O

R. Bean and O. Dore,Probing dark energy perturbations: The Dark energy equation of state and speed of sound as measured by WMAP, Phys. Rev. D69, (2004) 083503. – 11 –

work page 2004
[18]

J. Q. Xia, Y. F. Cai, T. T. Qiu, G. B. Zhao and X. Zhang,Constraints on the Sound Speed of Dynamical Dark Energy, Int. J. Mod. Phys.D17, (2008) 1229

work page 2008
[19]

de Putter, D

R. de Putter, D. Huterer, E. V. Linder,Measuring the speed of dark: Detecting dark energy perturbations, Phys. Rev. D81, (2010) 103513

work page 2010
[20]

Calabrese, R

E. Calabrese, R. de Putter, D. Huterer, E. V. Linder, A. Melchiorri,Future CMB constraints on early, cold, or stressed dark energy, Phys. Rev. D83, (2011) 023011

work page 2011
[21]

Archidiacono, L

M. Archidiacono, L. Lopez-Honorez and O. Mena,Current constraints on early and stressed dark energy models and future 21 cm perspectives, Phys. Rev. D90, (2014) 123016

work page 2014
[22]

Verde, E

L. Verde, E. Bellini, C. Pigozzo, A. F. Heavens and R. Jimenez,Early Cosmology Constrained, JCAP 1704, (2017) 023

work page 2017
[23]

Bhattacharyya, U

A. Bhattacharyya, U. Alam, K. L. Pandey, S. Das and S. Pal,Are H0 and σ8 tensions generic to present cosmological data?, Astrophys. J. 876, (2019) 143

work page 2019
[24]

Doran and G

M. Doran and G. Robbers,Early dark energy cosmologies, JCAP 0606, (2006) 026

work page 2006
[25]

C. S. Lorenz, E. Calabrese and D. Alonso,Distinguishing between Neutrinos and time-varying Dark Energy through Cosmic Time, Phys. Rev. D96, (2017) 043510

work page 2017
[26]

Calabrese, D

E. Calabrese, D. Huterer, E. V. Linder, A. Melchiorri, L. Pagano,Limits on dark radiation, early dark energy, and relativistic degrees of freedom, Phys. Rev. D83, (2011) 123504

work page 2011
[27]

C. L. Reichardt, R. de Putter, O. Zahn, Z. Hou,New Limits on Early Dark Energy from the South Pole Telescope, Astrophys. J. 749, (2012) L9

work page 2012
[28]

Pettorino, L

V. Pettorino, L. Amendola and C. Wetterich,How early is early dark energy?, Phys. Rev. D87, (2013) 083009

work page 2013
[29]

Calabrese, M

E. Calabrese, M. Martinelli, S. Pandolﬁ, V. F. Cardone, C. J. A. P. Martins, S. Spiro and P. E. Vielzeuf,Dark Energy coupling with electromagnetism as seen from future low-medium redshift probes, Phys. Rev. D89, (2014) 083509

work page 2014
[30]

Bonilla and J

A. Bonilla and J. E. Castillo,Constraints On Dark Energy Models From Galaxy Clusters and Gravitational Lensing Data, Universe 4, (2018) 21

work page 2018
[31]

R. R. Caldwell and C. Devulder,Gravitational Wave Opacity from Gauge Field Dark Energy, arXiv:1802.07371 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[32]

P. S. Corasaniti and E. J. Copeland,A Model independent approach to the dark energy equation of state, Phys. Rev. D67, (2003) 063521

work page 2003
[33]

Weller and A

J. Weller and A. M. Lewis,Large scale cosmic microwave background anisotropies and dark energy, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.346, (2003) 987

work page 2003
[34]

Alam et al

S. Alam et al. ,The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.470, (2017) 2617

work page 2017
[35]

D. M. Scolnic et al. ,The Complete Light-curve Sample of Spectroscopically Conﬁrmed SNe Ia from Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from the Combined Pantheon Sample, Astrophys. J. 859, (2018) 101

work page 2018
[36]

T. M. C. Abbott et al. ,Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing, Phys. Rev. D98, (2018) 043526

work page 2018
[37]

Handley and P

W. Handley and P. Lemos,Quantifying tension: interpreting the DES evidence ratio, arXiv:1902.04029 [astro-ph.CO]. – 12 –

work page arXiv 1902

[1] [1]

A. G. Riess et al. ,Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, Astron. J. 116, (1998) 1009

work page 1998

[2] [2]

Perlmutter et al

S. Perlmutter et al. ,Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 high redshift supernovae, Astrophys. J. 517, (1999) 565

work page 1999

[3] [3]

P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra,The Cosmological constant and dark energy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, (2003) 559

work page 2003

[4] [4]

Sahni and A

V. Sahni and A. Starobinsky,Reconstructing Dark Energy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D15, (2006) 2105

work page 2006

[5] [5]

E. J. Copeland, M. Sami and S. Tsujikawa,Dynamics of dark energy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D15, (2006) 1753

work page 2006

[6] [6]

J. P. Uzan,The acceleration of the universe and the physics behind it, Gen. Rel. Grav.39, (2007) 307

work page 2007

[7] [7]

E. V. Linder,The Dynamics of Quintessence, The Quintessence of Dynamics, Gen. Rel. Grav. 40, (2008) 329

work page 2008

[8] [8]

M. Li, X. D. Li, S. Wang and Y. Wang,Dark Energy, Commun. Theor. Phys.56, (2011) 525

work page 2011

[9] [9]

D. H. Weinberg et al. ,Observational Probes of Cosmic Acceleration, Phys. Rept. 530, (2013) 87-255

work page 2013

[10] [10]

Bahamonde, C

S. Bahamonde, C. G. BÃűhmer, S. Carloni, E. J. Copeland, W. Fang and N. Tamanini, Dynamical systems applied to cosmology: dark energy and modiﬁed gravity, Phys. Rept. 775-777, (2018) 1

work page 2018

[11] [11]

Huterer and D

D. Huterer and D. L. Shafer,Dark energy two decades after: Observables, probes, consistency tests, Rept. Prog. Phys.81, (2018) 016901

work page 2018

[12] [12]

P. A. R. Ade et al. ,Planck 2015 results. XIV. Dark energy and modiﬁed gravity, Astron. Astrophys. 594, (2016) A14

work page 2015

[13] [13]

Ballesteros and J

G. Ballesteros and J. Lesgourgues,Dark energy with non-adiabatic sound speed: initial conditions and detectability, JCAP 1010, (2010) 014

work page 2010

[14] [14]

Creminelli, G

P. Creminelli, G. D’Amico, J. Norena, L. Senatore and F. Vernizzi,Spherical collapse in quintessence models with zero speed of sound, JCAP 1003, (2010) 027

work page 2010

[15] [15]

Sapone, M

D. Sapone, M. Kunz,Fingerprinting Dark Energy, Phys. Rev. D80, (2009) 083519

work page 2009

[16] [16]

Sapone, M

D. Sapone, M. Kunz, L. Amendola,Fingerprinting dark energy. II. Weak lensing and galaxy clustering tests, Phys. Rev. D82, (2010) 103535

work page 2010

[17] [17]

Bean and O

R. Bean and O. Dore,Probing dark energy perturbations: The Dark energy equation of state and speed of sound as measured by WMAP, Phys. Rev. D69, (2004) 083503. – 11 –

work page 2004

[18] [18]

J. Q. Xia, Y. F. Cai, T. T. Qiu, G. B. Zhao and X. Zhang,Constraints on the Sound Speed of Dynamical Dark Energy, Int. J. Mod. Phys.D17, (2008) 1229

work page 2008

[19] [19]

de Putter, D

R. de Putter, D. Huterer, E. V. Linder,Measuring the speed of dark: Detecting dark energy perturbations, Phys. Rev. D81, (2010) 103513

work page 2010

[20] [20]

Calabrese, R

E. Calabrese, R. de Putter, D. Huterer, E. V. Linder, A. Melchiorri,Future CMB constraints on early, cold, or stressed dark energy, Phys. Rev. D83, (2011) 023011

work page 2011

[21] [21]

Archidiacono, L

M. Archidiacono, L. Lopez-Honorez and O. Mena,Current constraints on early and stressed dark energy models and future 21 cm perspectives, Phys. Rev. D90, (2014) 123016

work page 2014

[22] [22]

Verde, E

L. Verde, E. Bellini, C. Pigozzo, A. F. Heavens and R. Jimenez,Early Cosmology Constrained, JCAP 1704, (2017) 023

work page 2017

[23] [23]

Bhattacharyya, U

A. Bhattacharyya, U. Alam, K. L. Pandey, S. Das and S. Pal,Are H0 and σ8 tensions generic to present cosmological data?, Astrophys. J. 876, (2019) 143

work page 2019

[24] [24]

Doran and G

M. Doran and G. Robbers,Early dark energy cosmologies, JCAP 0606, (2006) 026

work page 2006

[25] [25]

C. S. Lorenz, E. Calabrese and D. Alonso,Distinguishing between Neutrinos and time-varying Dark Energy through Cosmic Time, Phys. Rev. D96, (2017) 043510

work page 2017

[26] [26]

Calabrese, D

E. Calabrese, D. Huterer, E. V. Linder, A. Melchiorri, L. Pagano,Limits on dark radiation, early dark energy, and relativistic degrees of freedom, Phys. Rev. D83, (2011) 123504

work page 2011

[27] [27]

C. L. Reichardt, R. de Putter, O. Zahn, Z. Hou,New Limits on Early Dark Energy from the South Pole Telescope, Astrophys. J. 749, (2012) L9

work page 2012

[28] [28]

Pettorino, L

V. Pettorino, L. Amendola and C. Wetterich,How early is early dark energy?, Phys. Rev. D87, (2013) 083009

work page 2013

[29] [29]

Calabrese, M

E. Calabrese, M. Martinelli, S. Pandolﬁ, V. F. Cardone, C. J. A. P. Martins, S. Spiro and P. E. Vielzeuf,Dark Energy coupling with electromagnetism as seen from future low-medium redshift probes, Phys. Rev. D89, (2014) 083509

work page 2014

[30] [30]

Bonilla and J

A. Bonilla and J. E. Castillo,Constraints On Dark Energy Models From Galaxy Clusters and Gravitational Lensing Data, Universe 4, (2018) 21

work page 2018

[31] [31]

R. R. Caldwell and C. Devulder,Gravitational Wave Opacity from Gauge Field Dark Energy, arXiv:1802.07371 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv

[32] [32]

P. S. Corasaniti and E. J. Copeland,A Model independent approach to the dark energy equation of state, Phys. Rev. D67, (2003) 063521

work page 2003

[33] [33]

Weller and A

J. Weller and A. M. Lewis,Large scale cosmic microwave background anisotropies and dark energy, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.346, (2003) 987

work page 2003

[34] [34]

Alam et al

S. Alam et al. ,The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.470, (2017) 2617

work page 2017

[35] [35]

D. M. Scolnic et al. ,The Complete Light-curve Sample of Spectroscopically Conﬁrmed SNe Ia from Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from the Combined Pantheon Sample, Astrophys. J. 859, (2018) 101

work page 2018

[36] [36]

T. M. C. Abbott et al. ,Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing, Phys. Rev. D98, (2018) 043526

work page 2018

[37] [37]

Handley and P

W. Handley and P. Lemos,Quantifying tension: interpreting the DES evidence ratio, arXiv:1902.04029 [astro-ph.CO]. – 12 –

work page arXiv 1902