Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 37 references

A note on a sinh-Poisson type equation with variable intensities on pierced domains

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For small ρ, a sinh-Poisson equation on a pierced domain admits blow-up solutions with prescribed signs at chosen points.

desk verdict A useful, incremental existence result for sign-changing sinh-Poisson blow-up on pierced domains, but the linear-theory proof has a gap involving non-radial kernel modes that the paper dismisses with an unstated symmetry assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.00905 v2 pith:2D65N6GN submitted 2019-09-03 math.AP

P. Figueroa This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35B4435J2535J60
keywords sinh-Poissonequationpierceddomainblowing-upsolutionsvariableintensitiesLiouvilletypemeanfieldfixed-pointmethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes an existence result for a $\sinh$-Poisson type equation with variable coefficients and zero boundary data on a pierced domain: when the parameter $\rho$ is small enough, there are small hole radii for which the problem has a solution that blows up at a prescribed set of points, positively at a chosen subset and negatively at the rest. The equation is $\Delta u + \rho(V_1(x)e^u - V_2(x)e^{-\tau u})=0$ on $\Omega \setminus \bigcup_{i=1}^m \overline{B(\xi_i,\varepsilon_i)}$, a model connected to the statistical mechanics of two-dimensional turbulence and to mean-field equations. The proof builds an approximate solution from projections of explicit bubbles and then corrects it by a fixed-point argument. The interest is that mixed-sign blow-up is obtained for every sufficiently small $\rho$, without quantization conditions such as masses approaching multiples of $8\pi$, and the endpoint cases $m_1=0$ and $m_1=m$ yield single-sign Liouville-type blow-up as well.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is a parameter-tuned ansatz built from the projection operator $P_\varepsilon$ onto $H_0^1(\Omega_\varepsilon)$. For each $i$, $w_i(x)=\log\frac{2\alpha_i^2\delta_i^{\alpha_i}}{(\delta_i^{\alpha_i}+|x-\xi_i|^{\alpha_i})^2}$ is an entire solution of the singular Liouville equation $\Delta w+|x-\xi_i|^{\alpha_i-2}e^w=0$, and $P_\varepsilon w_i$ is its $H_0^1$ projection, which encodes the influence of the holes and the outer boundary through Green functions. The decisive step is the choice $\delta_i^{\alpha_i}=d_i\rho$, $\varepsilon_i^{(\alpha_i-2)/2}=r_i\rho$ with $r_i=d_i e^{-\pi\rho_i}$ (Lemma 2.3), which makes the leading logarithmic interactions cancel in identity (2.6), so that the signed sum $U$ is a good approximate solution; the coefficients $d_i,r_i$ in (2.12) are fixed by the values of $V_1,V_2$ at the blow-up points. The remaining machinery is a linear theory for $L(\varphi)=\Delta\varphi+\rho(V_1e^U+\tau V_2e^{-\tau U})\varphi$: solutions of the limiting operator in the plane are classified, suitable test functions are used to rule out the kernel, and the resulting a priori bound $\|\varphi\|\le C|\log\rho|\|h\|_p$ feeds the contraction mapping.

What would settle it

The quantitative crux is the residual estimate (2.13): at the parameter choices (2.7)–(2.12) one must have $\|R\|_p=O(\rho^{\sigma_p})$ with $\sigma_p>0$ for some $p>1$, so that $|\log\rho|\,\|R\|_p\to 0$. A concrete check would be to take the simplest non-trivial case — $\Omega$ the unit disk, one hole, $V_1=V_2=1$, $\tau=1$, and the endpoint $m_1=m=1$ — write the ansatz $U$ explicitly for the parameters prescribed by (2.12), and compute the residual $R=\Delta U+\rho(e^U-e^{-\tau U})$ on a sequence $\rho\to 0$; if $\rho^{-\sigma}\|R\|_p$ with some fixed $p>1$ is not bounded, or if a logarithm of $\rho$ survives, then the estimate (2.13) fails and the fixed-point argument collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Theorem 1.1: for any $m$, any $m_1\in\{0,\dots,m\}$, and any distinct points $\xi_1,\dots,\xi_m$ in a smooth bounded planar domain $\Omega$, there exist radii $\varepsilon(\rho)$ small enough such that the Dirichlet problem (1.1) has a solution $u_\rho$ in $\Omega_\varepsilon$ which, as $\rho\to 0$, blows up positively at $\xi_1,\dots,\xi_{m_1}$ and negatively at $\xi_{m_1+1},\dots,\xi_m$. Away from the points, the solution is asymptotically a signed combination of Green functions, $u_\rho \to 2\pi\sum_{i=1}^{m_1}(\alpha_i+2)G(\cdot,\xi_i) - \frac{2\pi}{\tau}\sum_{i=m_1+1}^{m}(\alpha_i+2)G(\cdot,\xi_i)$, where $G$ is the Green function of $-\Delta$ in $\Omega$ and the $\alpha_i>2$ are parameters not in $2\mathbb{N}$. The construction uses a signed sum of projected singular Liouville bubbles $U=\sum_{i\le m_1} P_\varepsilon w_i - \frac{1}{\tau}\sum_{i>m_1}P_\varepsilon w_i$, with the $\delta_i$ and $\varepsilon_i$ chosen as $\delta_i^{\alpha_i}=d_i\rho$, $\varepsilon_i^{(\alpha_i-2)/2}=r_i\rho$, $r_i=d_i e^{-\pi\rho_i}$, so that the residual is $O(\rho^{\sigma_p})$ in $L^p$ for some $p>1$; a linear estimate $\|\varphi\|\le C|\log\rho|\|h\|_p$ for the linearized operator then allows a contraction argument to produce the small correction $\varphi$.

Load-bearing premise

The proof rests on a set of asymptotic expansions imported from [14] — Lemma 2.1 for the projected bubbles, Lemma 2.3 relating the radii, and Lemma 4.1 with the test-function expansions for the linear theory — which are stated without proof; if any of them fails in the parameter range (2.7)–(2.12), the approximate solution would carry an uncontrolled error and the contraction argument would not close.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every sufficiently small $\rho$ there is a pierced domain $\Omega_\varepsilon$ (with radii of order $\rho^{2/(\alpha_i-2)}$) on which the problem has a solution with prescribed positive blow-up at some chosen points and prescribed negative blow-up at the remaining points.
  • Away from the punctures the solution converges locally uniformly to $2\pi\sum_{i\le m_1}(\alpha_i+2)G(\cdot,\xi_i)-\frac{2\pi}{\tau}\sum_{i>m_1}(\alpha_i+2)G(\cdot,\xi_i)$, so both the locations and the signs of concentration are explicit in the data.
  • The endpoint cases $m_1=0$ (with $V_1\equiv 0$) and $m_1=m$ (with $V_2\equiv 0$) yield blow-up solutions to a Liouville-type equation on a pierced domain for all small $\rho$.
  • Smallness of $\rho$ alone suffices: unlike the mean-field formulation in [14], no condition that the Liouville masses $\lambda_1,\lambda_2\tau^2$ be close to multiples of $8\pi$ is needed for existence of mixed-sign blowing-up solutions.
  • The fixed-point proof yields the quantitative bound $\|\varphi\|_\infty \le C\rho^{\sigma_p}|\log\rho|$ for the correction, so the constructed solution is a small perturbation of the bubble sum $U$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension beyond the paper: for a single bubble in the unit disk the ansatz and parameter prescriptions become fully explicit, so the residual estimate (2.13) could be checked numerically on a sequence $\rho=10^{-k}$; this would give independent evidence for the expansions imported from [14].
  • The condition $\alpha_i\notin 2\mathbb{N}$ appears through the kernel of the limiting linearized operator (the functions $Y_{1i},Y_{2i}$ involve $\cos(\alpha_i\theta/2)$ and $\sin(\alpha_i\theta/2)$, which are not periodic for even $\alpha_i$); one may conjecture that even integer $\alpha_i$ requires additional orthogonality conditions or breaks the construction.
  • The theorem chooses hole radii after prescribing the blow-up points; a natural inverse direction — prescribe the radii and look for small $\rho$ — is not addressed and would need different estimates.
  • The construction likely extends to uniformly bounded $\tau$ in a compact subset of $(0,\infty)$ with constants depending on $\tau$ uniformly, since the estimates in Section 3 involve $\tau$ only through powers of $\tau$ and $1/\tau$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proves Theorem 1.1: for the sinh-Poisson type equation with variable intensities on a domain pierced by small holes centered at prescribed points ξ_1,...,ξ_m, for every sufficiently small ρ>0 there exist hole radii ε_1(ρ),...,ε_m(ρ) and a solution u_ρ in Ω_ε that blows up positively at ξ_1,...,ξ_{m_1} and negatively at ξ_{m_1+1},...,ξ_m as ρ→0. The proof follows the Lyapunov-Schmidt strategy of the companion paper [14]: an ansatz U is built from projected singular Liouville bubbles with parameters chosen by (2.7)-(2.12); the error R is estimated in Lemma 2.4; the linearized operator is shown invertible in Proposition 3.1; and a contraction argument in Proposition 3.2 produces the small correction φ. Several key asymptotic and spectral lemmas are imported verbatim from [14] without proofs.

Significance. If the construction is correct, the paper establishes a new existence result for mixed-sign concentrating solutions of a sinh-Poisson type equation in non-simply connected planar domains, extending the normalized mean-field results of [14] to the direct small-ρ formulation. The explicit parameter choices (2.7)-(2.12) and the transparent fixed-point scheme are strengths, and the blow-up profile is stated precisely through the Green's function expansion (2.10). The main obstacles to accepting the result as it stands are the unproved exclusion of non-radial kernel modes in the linear theory and the heavy reliance on imported unproved estimates from [14]; neither appears fatal, but both need to be repaired before the central claim is fully supported.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4, proof of Proposition 3.1, Claim 1] The claim that the rescaled limit Φ_i^* equals a_i Y_{0i} is justified only by the phrase "by using symmetry assumptions if necessary," but Theorem 1.1 assumes no symmetry on Ω, V_1, V_2, or the points ξ_i. According to the manuscript's own statement, the bounded solutions of L_i φ=0 are linear combinations of Y_{0i}, Y_{1i}, Y_{2i}; for the allowed range α_i>2 with α_i∉2N, the functions Y_{1i} and Y_{2i} are not single-valued on R^2, so a single-valuedness argument is needed to exclude them, and no such argument is supplied. This gap is load-bearing because the a priori estimate (3.5) in Proposition 3.1 and hence the contraction argument in Proposition 3.2 depend on Claim 1. The fix is local: replace the symmetry remark with a proof that the only single-valued bounded solutions in H_{α_i} are multiples of Y_{0i} under the condition α_i∉2N.
  2. [Sections 2 and 4 (Lemma 2.1, Lemma 2.3, Lemma 4.1, Claim 3)] Several load-bearing results are stated with references to [14] and no proofs: Lemma 2.1 (expansion of P_ε w_i), Lemma 2.3 (the relation r_i=d_i e^{-π ρ_i}), Lemma 4.1 (projected test-function expansions), and the test-function construction in Claim 3 of Section 4. These results support the error estimate Lemma 2.4 and the invertibility Proposition 3.1, which are the backbone of Theorem 1.1. The author should either include the proofs in the note or state precisely which results from [14] are being imported and verify that their hypotheses, including the parameter choices (2.7)-(2.12) and the error rates, are satisfied for the present equation (1.1). Without this, the reader cannot independently verify that the approximate solution U has the claimed accuracy.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4, after Claim 2] The statement "we deduce that Ψ_j,n converges to zero weakly" uses the symbol Ψ_j,n, which was never defined; it should refer to Φ_j,n.
  2. [Section 1, Theorem 1.1 and abstract] The clause "In Theorem 1.1 we intend that m1=m if ν=0 (or V2≡0) and m1=0 if V1≡0" conflicts with the abstract's statement that the result holds for m1∈{0,...,m} with V_1,V_2>0; the exact hypotheses for the endpoint cases should be stated unambiguously.
  3. [Section 2, proof of Lemma 2.4] The exponent in the error estimate is first denoted σ=min{1/α_i} and later written σ_p, but the dependence of σ_p on p is not defined; the notation should be made consistent.
  4. [Section 3, proof of Lemma 3.3, around (3.14)] The definition of σ_{0,q} just before (3.14) is ambiguous as printed, and the Hölder exponents r_i, s_i, t_i used in (3.9) should be stated clearly; as written, the estimates are difficult to verify.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the theorem is proved by a Lyapunov-Schmidt reduction whose target existence is not assumed; imported lemmas from [14] are external prior results, not the theorem being proved.

full rationale

Theorem 1.1 asserts existence of mixed-sign blowing-up solutions for small rho on pierced domains. The proof constructs an approximate solution U (Section 2), estimates the error R (Lemma 2.4), proves an invertibility estimate for the linearized operator L (Proposition 3.1), and closes with a contraction argument (Proposition 3.2). None of these steps feeds the desired conclusion back in as an input: the parameters d_i and r_i in (2.12) are free design choices made to satisfy the balancing conditions (2.6) and (2.11), not quantities fitted to a predicted output. Lemma 2.3 is imported from [14]; it is a technical relation between the scales, not a restatement of the existence theorem, and its assumptions do not include the target result. Similarly, Lemma 2.1 and Lemma 4.1 are expansion lemmas from [14]. Although [14] has overlapping authorship, it is an external, peer-reviewed result on a different equation (1.7) and is used as a toolbox, not as a substitute for the fixed-point proof. The paper itself proves the genuinely new parts (error estimate, nonlinear contraction, and the blow-up profile) internally. The only flagged weakness, in Claim 1 of Section 4, is the line 'by using symmetry assumptions if necessary' to pass from a solution of the limiting linear equation to a multiple of Y0i; this is a possible rigor gap in the invertibility proof under the stated non-symmetric assumptions, but it is a correctness concern, not a circularity, because it does not assume the theorem. No equation in the paper reduces by construction to the existence statement, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. Hence score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The construction uses no invented physical entities. It postulates a family of bubble profiles parametrized by α_i, imposes scaling laws (2.7), and imports several asymptotic lemmas from the companion paper [14]. The free parameters are the α_i and the imposed blow-up rates; these are chosen by hand and shape the final blow-up profiles.

free parameters (2)
  • α_i (i=1,...,m) = arbitrary real numbers with α_i>2 and α_i∉2N
    The ansatz w_i and the final blow-up profile 2π(α_i+2)G depend on α_i; these are chosen by hand to make the construction work and are not fixed by the equation.
  • scaling exponents and constants in (2.7)-(2.12) = δ_i^{α_i}=d_iρ, ε_i^{(α_i-2)/2}=r_iρ, with d_i,r_i given by (2.12)
    The rates of bubble widths and hole radii are imposed so that the error term is small; they are part of the construction, not derived from the solution.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Green's function H,G on Ω and the maximum principle support the projection expansions (2.4)-(2.5).
    Used to expand P_ε w_i and to identify the leading-order terms in Corollary 2.2.
  • standard math The finite-energy kernel of the limiting linear operator L_i in R^2 is spanned only by the radial mode Y_{0i}; solutions with angular modes are excluded by the H_α space.
    This classification, cited from [9] and [28], is essential for the invertibility estimate in Proposition 3.1.
  • ad hoc to paper Lemma 2.1, Lemma 2.3, Lemma 4.1 and Claim 3 from [14] are valid verbatim for the parameter choices made in this note.
    The manuscript does not prove these statements; the approximate solution and the linear theory inherit all hypotheses from [14].
  • domain assumption Ω is a smooth bounded domain, V1,V2 are positive smooth, τ>0, and the points ξ_i are distinct and stay away from ∂Ω.
    These are the standing hypotheses of Theorem 1.1 and are used throughout the estimates.
  • ad hoc to paper α_i>2 and α_i∉2N for every i.
    These restrictions are not derived from the equation; they make the singular Liouville profiles and the expansions well-behaved.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A note on a sinh-Poisson type equation with variable intensities on pierced domains." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2D65N6GN

@misc{pith2026190900905,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A note on a sinh-Poisson type equation with variable intensities on pierced domains},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2D65N6GN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.00905}
}
abstract

We consider a sinh-Poisson type equation with variable intensities and Dirichlet boundary condition on a pierced domain \begin{equation*} \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \Delta u +\rho\left(V_1(x)e^{u}- V_2(x)e^{-\tau u}\right)=0 &\text{in } \Omega_\epsilon:=\Omega\setminus \displaystyle \bigcup_{i=1}^m \overline{B(\xi_i,\epsilon_i)}\\ u=0&\text{on }\partial\Omega_\epsilon, \end{array}\right. \end{equation*} where $\rho>0$, $V_1,V_2>0$ are smooth potentials in $\Omega$, $\tau>0$, $\Omega$ is a smooth bounded domain in $\mathbb{R}^2$ and $B(\xi_i,\epsilon_i)$ is a ball centered at $\xi_i\in \Omega$ with radius $\epsilon_i>0$, $i=1,\dots,m$. When $\rho>0$ is small enough and $m_1\in \{1,\dots,m-1\}$, there exist radii $\epsilon=(\epsilon_1,\dots,\epsilon_m)$ small enough such that the problem has a solution which blows-up positively at the points $\xi_1,\dots,\xi_{m_1}$ and negatively at the points $\xi_{m_1+1},\dots,\xi_{m}$ as $\rho\to 0$. The result remains true in cases $m_1=0$ with $V_1\equiv 0$ and $m_1=m$ with $V_2\equiv 0$, which are Liouville type equations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [14]

    Esposito, P

    P. Esposito, P. Figueroa, A. Pistoia On the mean field equation with variable intensities on pierc ed domains , Non- linear Analysis 190 (2020) 111597, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2019.1115 97

    work page arXiv 2020

  2. [28]

    Ould Ahmedou, A

    M. Ould Ahmedou, A. Pistoia, On the supercritical mean field equation on pierced domains , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 143 (2015), no. 9, 3969–3984

    work page 2015

  3. [1]

    Bartolucci, C.S

    D. Bartolucci, C.S. Lin, Existence and uniqueness for mean field equations on multipl y connected domains at the critical parameter, Math. Ann. 359 (2014), 1–44

    work page 2014

  4. [2]

    Bartolucci, A

    D. Bartolucci, A. Pistoia, Existence and qualitative properties of concentrating sol utions for the sinh-Poisson equa- tion, IMA J. Appl. Math. 72 (2007), no. 6, 706-729

    work page 2007

  5. [3]

    Bartsch, A

    T. Bartsch, A. Pistoia, T. Weth, N -vortex equilibria for ideal fluids in bounded planar domai ns and new nodal solutions of the sinh-Poisson and the Lane-Emden-Fowler eq uations. Comm. Math. Phys. 297 (2010), no. 3, 653- 686

    work page 2010

  6. [4]

    Battaglia, A

    L. Battaglia, A. Jevnikar, A. Malchiodi, D. Ruiz, A general existence result for the Toda system on compact sur faces, Adv. Math. 285 (2015), 937-979

    work page 2015

  7. [5]

    Caglioti, P.L

    E. Caglioti, P.L. Lions, C. Marchioro, M. Pulvirenti, A special class of stationary flows for two-dimensional Eule r equations: a statistical mechanics description , Comm. Math. Phys. 143 (1992), 501–525

    work page 1992

  8. [6]

    Caglioti, P.L

    E. Caglioti, P.L. Lions, C. Marchioro, M. Pulvirenti, A special class of stationery flows for two-dimensional Eule r equations: A statistical mechanics description, part II , Comm. Math. Phys. 174 (1995), 229–260

    work page 1995

Show all 37 references
  1. [7]

    Chen, C.S

    C.C. Chen, C.S. Lin, Sharp estimates for solutions of multi-bubbles in compact R iemann surfaces , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 55 (2002), 728–771

    2002

  2. [8]

    Chen, C.S

    C.C. Chen, C.S. Lin, Topological Degree for a mean field equation on Riemann surfa ce, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 56 (2003), 1667–1727

    2003

  3. [9]

    del Pino, P

    M. del Pino, P. Esposito, M. Musso, Linearized theory for entire solutions of a singular Liouvi llle equation , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 140 (2012), no. 2, 581–588

    2012

  4. [10]

    del Pino, P

    M. del Pino, P. Esposito, P. Figueroa, M. Musso, Non-topological condensates for the self-dual Chern-Simo ns-Higgs model, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 68 (2015), 1191–1283

    2015

  5. [11]

    del Pino, M

    M. del Pino, M. Kowalczyk, M. Musso, Singular limits in Liouville-type equations . Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 24 (2005), no. 1, 47–81

    2005

  6. [12]

    Djadli, Existence result for the mean field problem on Riemann surfac es of all genuses , Commun

    Z. Djadli, Existence result for the mean field problem on Riemann surfac es of all genuses , Commun. Contemp. Math. 10 (2008), 205-220

    2008

  7. [13]

    Esposito, P

    P. Esposito, P. Figueroa, Singular mean field equations on compact Riemann surfaces , Nonlinear Analysis 111 (2014), 33–65

    2014

  8. [15]

    Esposito, M

    P. Esposito, M. Grossi, A. Pistoia, On the existence of blowing-up solutions for a mean field equa tion. Ann. IHP Analyse Non Lin´ eaire22 (2005), no. 2 , 227–257

    2005

  9. [16]

    Figueroa, Singular limits for Liouville-type equations on the flat two -torus, Calc

    P. Figueroa, Singular limits for Liouville-type equations on the flat two -torus, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equa- tions 49 (2014), no. 1-2, 613-647

    2014

  10. [17]

    Grossi, A

    M. Grossi, A. Pistoia, Multiple Blow-Up Phenomena for the Sinh-Poisson Equation , Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 209 (2013) 287–320

    2013

  11. [18]

    Jevnikar, An existence result for the mean field equation on compact sur faces in a doubly supercritical regime , Proc

    A. Jevnikar, An existence result for the mean field equation on compact sur faces in a doubly supercritical regime , Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect A 143 (2013), 1021–1045

    2013

  12. [19]

    Jevnikar, Blow-up analysis and existence results in the supercritica l case for an asymmetric mean field equation with variable intensities , J

    A. Jevnikar, Blow-up analysis and existence results in the supercritica l case for an asymmetric mean field equation with variable intensities , J. Diff. Eq. 263 (2017), no. 2, 972-1008

    2017

  13. [20]

    Jevnikar, J

    A. Jevnikar, J. Wei, W. Yang, Classification of blow-up limits for the sinh-Gordon equati on, Differential Integral Equations 31 (2018), 657–684

    2018

  14. [21]

    Jevnikar, J

    A. Jevnikar, J. Wei, W. Yang, On the topological degree of the mean field equation with two p arameters, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 67 (2018), no. 1, 29–88

    2018

  15. [22]

    J. Jost, G. Wang, D. Ye, C. Zhou, The blow up of solutions of the elliptic sinh-Gordon equatio n, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 31 (2008) no. 2, 263–276

    2008

  16. [23]

    Lin, An expository survey on recent development of mean field equa tions, Discr

    C.S. Lin, An expository survey on recent development of mean field equa tions, Discr. Cont. Dynamical Systems 19 (2007), 217–247

    2007

  17. [24]

    Malchiodi, Morse theory and a scalar field equation on compact surfaces , Adv

    A. Malchiodi, Morse theory and a scalar field equation on compact surfaces , Adv. Differential Equations 13 (2008), 1109–1129

    2008

  18. [25]

    Neri, Statistical mechanics of the N-point vortex system with ran dom intensities on a bounded domain , Ann

    C. Neri, Statistical mechanics of the N-point vortex system with ran dom intensities on a bounded domain , Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire21 (2004), no. 3, 381?399

    2004

  19. [26]

    Ohtsuka, T

    H. Ohtsuka, T. Suzuki, Mean field equation for the equilibrium turbulence and a rela ted functional inequality , Adv. Differential Equations 11 (2006), 281–304

    2006

  20. [27]

    Onsager, Statistical hydrodynamics

    L. Onsager, Statistical hydrodynamics. Nuovo Cimento (9) 6 (1949), 279–287

    1949

  21. [29]

    Pistoia, T

    A. Pistoia, T. Ricciardi, Concentrating solutions for a Liouville type equation with variable intensities in 2D- turbulence, Nonlinearity 29 (2016), no. 2, 271–297

    2016

  22. [30]

    Pistoia, T

    A. Pistoia, T. Ricciardi, Sign-changing tower of bubbles for a sinh-Poisson equation with asymmetric exponents , Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 37 (2017), 5651–5692

    2017

  23. [31]

    Ricciardi, Mountain pass solutions for a mean field equation from two-di mensional turbulence , Diff

    T. Ricciardi, Mountain pass solutions for a mean field equation from two-di mensional turbulence , Diff. Int. Eqs. 20 (2007), 561–575

    2007

  24. [32]

    Ricciardi, R

    T. Ricciardi, R. Takahashi, Blow-up behavior for a degenerate elliptic sinh-Poisson eq uation with variable intensities , Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 55 (2016), Paper No. 152, 25 pp

    2016

  25. [33]

    Ricciardi, R

    T. Ricciardi, R. Takahashi, G. Zecca, X. Zhang, On the existence and blow-up of solutions for a mean field equa tion with variable intensities , Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Rend. Lincei Mat. Appl. 27 (2016), 413–429

    2016

  26. [34]

    Ricciardi, G

    T. Ricciardi, G. Zecca, Blow-up analysis for some mean field equations involving pro bability measures from statistical hydrodynamics, Differential and Integral Equa- tions 25 n. 3?4 (2012), 201? 222. SINH-POISSON TYPE EQUATION ON PIERCED DOMAINS 15

    2012

  27. [35]

    Ricciardi, G

    T. Ricciardi, G. Zecca, Mass quantization and minmax solutions for Neri’s mean field equation in 2D-turbulence , J. Diff. Eq. 260 (1), (2016), 339-369

    2016

  28. [36]

    Ricciardi, G

    T. Ricciardi, G. Zecca, Minimal blow-up masses and existence of solutions for an asy mmetric sinh- Poisson equa- tion, Math. Nachr. 290 (2017), no. 14-15, 2375-2387

    2017

  29. [37]

    Sawada, T

    K. Sawada, T. Suzuki, Derivation of the equilibrium mean field equations of point v ortex and vortex filament system , Theoret. Appl. Mech. Japan 56 (2008), 285–290. Pablo Figueroa Universidad Austral de Chile F acultad Ciencias Instituto de Ciencias F ´ısicas y Matem ´aticas Ca...

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.