Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Comparison of Rendering Techniques for Large 3D Line Sets with Transparency

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1912.08485 v2 pith:25CAU2MO submitted 2019-12-18 cs.GR

classification cs.GR
keywords renderingsetslinelinestechniquestransparencylargetransparent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive study of interactive rendering techniques for large 3D line sets with transparency. The rendering of transparent lines is widely used for visualizing trajectories of tracer particles in flow fields. Transparency is then used to fade out lines deemed unimportant, based on, for instance, geometric properties or attributes defined along them. Since accurate blending of transparent lines requires rendering the lines in back-to-front or front-to-back order, enforcing this order for 3D line sets with tens or even hundreds of thousands of elements becomes challenging. In this paper, we study CPU and GPU rendering techniques for large transparent 3D line sets. We compare accurate and approximate techniques using optimized implementations and a number of benchmark data sets. We discuss the effects of data size and transparency on quality, performance and memory consumption. Based on our study, we propose two improvements to per-pixel fragment lists and multi-layer alpha blending. The first improves the rendering speed via an improved GPU sorting operation, and the second improves rendering quality via a transparency-based bucketing.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools