Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Supermodeling of tumor dynamics with parallel isogeometric analysis solver

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1912.12836 v4 pith:SBGP5E4X submitted 2019-12-30 cs.CE

classification cs.CE
keywords supermodelsupermodelingsub-modelsconvergencedatameta-parametersprocedureconvergent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Supermodeling is a modern, model-ensembling paradigm that integrates several self-synchronized imperfect sub-models by controlling a few meta-parameters to generate more accurate predictions of complex systems' dynamics. Continual synchronization between sub-models allows for trajectory predictions with superior accuracy compared to a single model or a classical ensemble of independent models whose decision fusion is based on the majority voting or averaging the outcomes. However, it comes out from numerous observations that the supermodeling procedure's convergence depends on a few principal factors such as (1) the number of sub-models, (2) their proper selection, and (3) the choice of the convergent optimization procedure, which assimilates the supermodel meta-parameters to data. Herein, we focus on modeling the evolution of the system described by a set of PDEs. We prove that supermodeling is conditionally convergent to a fixed-point attractor regarding only the supermodel meta-parameters. We investigate the formal conditions of the convergence of the supermodeling scheme theoretically. We employ the Banach fixed point theorem for the supermodeling correction operator, updating the synchronization constants' values iteratively. The "nudging" of the supermodel to the ground truth should be well balanced because both too small and too large attraction to data cause the supermodel desynchronization. The time-step size can control the convergence of the training procedure, by balancing the Lipshitz continuity constant of the PDE operator. All the sub-models have to be close to the ground-truth along the training trajectory but still sufficiently diverse to explore the phase space better. As an example, we discuss the three-dimensional supermodel of tumor evolution to demonstrate the supermodel's perfect fit to artificial data generated based on real medical images.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools