Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Workload Scheduling on heterogeneous Mobile Edge Cloud in 5G networks to Minimize SLA Violation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.02820 v2 pith:WJPMCV6K submitted 2020-03-05 cs.DC cs.NI

classification cs.DCcs.NI
keywords migrationmobileserverscloudnetworksproblemschedulingsolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Smart devices have become an indispensable part of our lives and gain increasing applicability in almost every area. Latency-aware applications such as Augmented Reality (AR), autonomous driving, and online gaming demand more resources such as network bandwidth and computational capabilities. Since the traditional mobile networks cannot fulfill the required bandwidth and latency, Mobile Edge Cloud (MEC) emerged to provide cloud computing capabilities in the proximity of users on 5G networks. In this paper, we consider a heterogeneous MEC network with numerous mobile users that send their tasks to MEC servers. Each task has a maximum acceptable response time. Non-uniform distribution of users makes some MEC servers hotspots that cannot take more. A solution is to relocate the tasks among MEC servers, called Workload Migration. We formulate this problem of task scheduling as a mixed-integer non-linear optimization problem to minimize the number of Service Level Agreement (SLA) violations. Since solving this optimization problem has high computational complexity, we introduce a greedy algorithm called MESA, Migration Enabled Scheduling Algorithm, which reaches a near-optimal solution quickly. Our experiments show that in the term of SLA violation, MESA is only 8% and 11% far from the optimal choice on the average and the worst-case, respectively. Moreover, the migration enabled solution can reduce SLA violations by about 30% compare to assigning tasks to MEC servers without migration.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools