Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Deep Learning for High Speed Optical Coherence Elastography

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.14024 v1 pith:FLMY6UIP submitted 2020-04-29 eess.IV

classification eess.IV
keywords deepelastographylearningpropertiesshearwaveelastictissue
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Mechanical properties of tissue provide valuable information for identifying lesions. One approach to obtain quantitative estimates of elastic properties is shear wave elastography with optical coherence elastography (OCE). However, given the shear wave velocity, it is still difficult to estimate elastic properties. Hence, we propose deep learning to directly predict elastic tissue properties from OCE data. We acquire 2D images with a frame rate of 30 kHz and use convolutional neural networks to predict gelatin concentration, which we use as a surrogate for tissue elasticity. We compare our deep learning approach to predictions from conventional regression models, using the shear wave velocity as a feature. Mean absolut prediction errors for the conventional approaches range from 1.32$\pm$0.98 p.p. to 1.57$\pm$1.30 p.p. whereas we report an error of 0.90$\pm$0.84 p.p for the convolutional neural network with 3D spatio-temporal input. Our results indicate that deep learning on spatio-temporal data outperforms elastography based on explicit shear wave velocity estimation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools