REVIEW
Prediction of Memory Retrieval Performance Using Ear-EEG Signals
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Many studies have explored brain signals during the performance of a memory task to predict later remembered items. However, prediction methods are still poorly used in real life and are not practical due to the use of electroencephalography (EEG) recorded from the scalp. Ear-EEG has been recently used to measure brain signals due to its flexibility when applying it to real world environments. In this study, we attempt to predict whether a shown stimulus is going to be remembered or forgotten using ear-EEG and compared its performance with scalp-EEG. Our results showed that there was no significant difference between ear-EEG and scalp-EEG. In addition, the higher prediction accuracy was obtained using a convolutional neural network (pre-stimulus: 74.06%, on-going stimulus: 69.53%) and it was compared to other baseline methods. These results showed that it is possible to predict performance of a memory task using ear-EEG signals and it could be used for predicting memory retrieval in a practical brain-computer interface.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.