Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Complete Characterization of Incorrect Orthology Assignments in Best Match Graphs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.02249 v2 pith:DC65UWW6 submitted 2020-06-03 q-bio.PE cs.DMcs.DSmath.CO

classification q-bio.PEcs.DMcs.DSmath.CO
keywords assignmentsorthologybestmatchgeneincorrectreciprocalbmgs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Genome-scale orthology assignments are usually based on reciprocal best matches. In the absence of horizontal gene transfer (HGT), every pair of orthologs forms a reciprocal best match. Incorrect orthology assignments therefore are always false positives in the reciprocal best match graph. We consider duplication/loss scenarios and characterize unambiguous false-positive (u-fp) orthology assignments, that is, edges in the best match graphs (BMGs) that cannot correspond to orthologs for any gene tree that explains the BMG. Moreover, we provide a polynomial-time algorithm to identify all u-fp orthology assignments in a BMG. Simulations show that at least $75\%$ of all incorrect orthology assignments can be detected in this manner. All results rely only on the structure of the BMGs and not on any a priori knowledge about underlying gene or species trees.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools