Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Robotic Reverberation Mapping of the Southern Seyfert NGC 3783

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.11358 v2 pith:LIT5QIIF submitted 2020-09-23 astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords timelinemassbetablackbroaddelayreverberation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We present spectroscopic and photometric monitoring of NGC 3783 conducted throughout the first half of 2020. Time delays between the continuum variations and the response of the broad optical emission lines were clearly detected, and we report reverberation measurements for H$\beta$, HeII $\lambda 4686$, H$\gamma$, and H$\delta$. From the time delay in the broad H$\beta$ emission line and the line width in the variable portion of the spectrum, we derive a black hole mass of $M_{\rm BH} = 2.34^{+0.43}_{-0.43} \times 10^7$ M$_{\odot}$. This is slightly smaller than, but consistent with, previous determinations. However, our significantly improved time sampling ($T_{\rm med}=1.7$ days compared to $T_{\rm med}=4.0$ days) has reduced the uncertainties on both the time delay and the derived mass by $\sim 50$%. We also detect clear velocity-resolved time delays across the broad H$\beta$ profile, with shorter lags in the line wings and a longer lag in the line core. Future modeling of the full velocity-resolved time delay response will further improve the reverberation-based mass for NGC 3783, adding it to the small but growing sample of AGNs for which we have direct, primary black hole mass measurements. Upcoming MUSE observations at VLT will also allow NGC 3783 to join the smaller sample of black holes where reverberation masses and masses from stellar dynamical modeling may be directly compared.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools