Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Repeating Fast Radio Bursts from Pulsar-Asteroid Belt Collisions: Frequency Drifting and Polarization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.14379 v1 pith:GECQ2DS5 submitted 2020-10-27 astro-ph.HE

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords frbsdriftingpolarizationrepeatingfrequencylinearmasspulsar
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are a new kind of extragalactic radio transients. Some of them show repeating behaviors. Recent observations indicate that a few repeating FRBs (e.g., FRB 121102) present time--frequency downward drifting patterns and nearly 100$\%$ linear polarization. Following the model of \citet{dai 2016} who proposed that repeating FRBs may originate from a slowly-rotating, old-aged pulsar colliding with an asteroid belt around a stellar-mass object, we focus on the prediction of time--frequency drifting and polarization. In this scenario, the frequency drifting is mainly caused by the geometric structure of a pulsar magnetosphere, and the drifting rate--frequency index is found to be $25/17$. On the other hand, by considering the typical differential mass distribution of incident asteroids, we find that an asteroid with mass $m\gtrsim 10^{17}~{\rm g}$ colliding with the pulsar would contribute abundant gravitational energy, which powers an FRB. A broad frequency band of the FRBs would be expected, due to the mass difference of the incident asteroids. In addition, we simulate the linear polarization distribution for the repeating FRBs, and constrain the linear polarization with $\gtrsim$ 30$\%$ for the FRBs with flux of an order of magnitude lower than the maximum flux.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools