pith. sign in

arxiv: 2102.02437 · v2 · pith:YNLCRVTMnew · submitted 2021-02-04 · 💻 cs.HC

EUCA: the End-User-Centered Explainable AI Framework

classification 💻 cs.HC
keywords explanatoryformsexplainableprototypingend-user-centeredcriticaldesignend-users
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The ability to explain decisions to end-users is a necessity to deploy AI as critical decision support. Yet making AI explainable to non-technical end-users is a relatively ignored and challenging problem. To bridge the gap, we first identify twelve end-user-friendly explanatory forms that do not require technical knowledge to comprehend, including feature-, example-, and rule-based explanations. We then instantiate the explanatory forms as prototyping cards in four AI-assisted critical decision-making tasks, and conduct a user study to co-design low-fidelity prototypes with 32 layperson participants. The results confirm the relevance of using explanatory forms as building blocks of explanations, and identify their proprieties - pros, cons, applicable explanation goals, and design implications. The explanatory forms, their proprieties, and prototyping supports (including a suggested prototyping process, design templates and exemplars, and associated algorithms to actualize explanatory forms) constitute the End-User-Centered explainable AI framework EUCA, and is available at http://weinajin.github.io/end-user-xai . It serves as a practical prototyping toolkit for HCI/AI practitioners and researchers to understand user requirements and build end-user-centered explainable AI.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. What Should Explanations Contain? A Human-Centered Explanation Content Model for Local, Post-Hoc Explanations

    cs.HC 2026-05 accept novelty 7.0

    A 14-code content model for local post-hoc AI explanations, derived from 325 user statements and validated by experts with high reliability scores.

  2. Bridging the Disciplinary Gap in Explainable AI: From Abstract Desiderata to Concrete Tasks

    cs.CY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The authors introduce a taxonomy with target, functional role, and mode of justification axes plus a framework that decomposes abstract XAI desiderata into concrete benchmarkable tasks via identified dependency structures.